OpenText Optimost vs. Unbounce

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Optimost
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Optimost is designed to help companies deliver engaging, profitable websites and campaigns and includes self-service capabilities. Optimost also provides white glove consulting to help companies test confidently when the stakes and complexity are highest; immediately when speed is of the essence, and to match the perfect content to every customer.N/A
Unbounce
Score 8.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Unbounce is a landing page builder for marketers. Marketers can use the drag and drop platform to create customized, responsive landing pages for their marketing campaigns.
$99
per month
Pricing
OpenText OptimostUnbounce
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Build
$99
per month
Experiment
$149
per month
Optimize
$249
per month
Agency
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText OptimostUnbounce
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsAll plans include: Unlimited conversions, Unlimited subdomains, 1000+ integrations, Built-in AI copywriting, and Customer support. Discount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText OptimostUnbounce
Considered Both Products
OpenText Optimost
Chose OpenText Optimost
We evaluated Optimost again Adobe's similar offering (Target). The big difference between the two and the reason why BSI choose Autonomy was the managed service aspect. The idea that once the code was deployed on the site IT no longer had to be involved gave my team full …
Unbounce
Chose Unbounce
There are simpler and cheaper tools, Unbounce comes at a slight premium which is worth it if you’re going to use both landing page and popup features
Chose Unbounce
Instapage is like Unbounce, but Unbounce has more customization options and better ratings.
Hubspot on the other hand is a complete package, just that I think their Drag and drop builder is not easy to grasp and it is more complicated than Unbounce.
Chose Unbounce
unbounce performs as well as both Clickfunnels and Highlevel. I would say it is better as a landing page builder than Highlevel, as Highlevel does multiple things, where as unbounce is a dedicated landing page builder, so it is more effective becaue of this focus. I prefer the …
Chose Unbounce
Unbounce is more experience, limited support and you pay so much per domain connected.
Chose Unbounce
Despite my review for unbounce being not the greatest review or score in the world, when stacked up against its two biggest competitors, I'd prefer Unbounce over Leadpages and Instapage. Leadpages drag and drop editor, integrations, and overall UI/UX is 10x worse than unbounce …
Chose Unbounce
It is clearly a more powerful than Mailchimp for landings and pop-ups. We were limited with what we could do with mailchimp and this tool is just laser focused on getting landings and pop up done easily and effectively. From templates, designs, improvement and scripts it does …
Chose Unbounce
Divi is easy to use. You can build pages fast. Global modules are easy to add. It does a better job. There is inbuilt AB testing but it's not as good as unbounce. But in comparison to the nasty experience building on unbounce's outdated builder... it's fantastic.

We selected …
Chose Unbounce
We have found that building landing pages in the CMS of choice is a much better solution. Unbounce is an ok solution for simple landing page needs but any more complex design or functionality needs are better handled inside the CMS. There are good plugins like Elementor and …
Chose Unbounce
Back when we started using Unbounce, our website was very rigid and couldn't be adapted quickly (since a tech task had to be submitted to the developers' team and then they would do it when they had time, etc.). This wasn't good for marketing purposes because it limited our …
Chose Unbounce
Unbounce is very similar all said and done to optimize. The main difference is in the pricing tiers and the templates that each of them offers. Each would be dependant on someone's specific business and I think is valuable to evaluate to determine which would be best for each …
Chose Unbounce
Instapage offers a/b testing and supports AMP. I haven't verified if Unbounce does too. We used a product called instabuider prior to both, which is a WordPress plugin' , There's more control with Unbounce than other page builders. We also found that there are more usable …
Chose Unbounce
SharpSpring integrates well with a robust CRM, but is more difficult to use. Again, I think Unbounce does a really great job of providing a landing page solution that provides the necessary functionality and tools to do a decent job. I'd like to see Unbounce expand its ability …
Chose Unbounce
LP was not as visually appealing and didn’t seem to have the same level of testing under their belt.
Chose Unbounce
Instapage is a very good product for landing page deployment. Unbounce has an advantage when it comes to site messaging. We are able to make site updates on specific areas of our web site that provide relevant content to very unique segments of our customer audience. The …
Chose Unbounce
Unbounce seems to be more complete and better suited for non-programmers. While Instapage has a slick UI and feel to it, when you get into actually using Instapage you find yourself looking for features that are standard in Unbounce like lead handling and script management. On …
Chose Unbounce
Unbounce seems more robust while also being easier to use than other similar landing page creators. The interface is Unbounce's main strength, allowing just about anyone to create a page in as little as thirty minutes.
Chose Unbounce
Leadpages is focused mostly on collecting emails, but Unbounce is focused on lead generation of all kinds, and offers a much more robust landing page builder that gives you the ability to create landing pages for any kind of strategy, not just collecting emails. We selected …
Chose Unbounce
Unbounce is a robust tool that will allow users to continuously create and optimize landing pages as they grow. The product overall is easy to get started with, but it may take some time to set up and get used to the navigation. Support from tech, design and marketing teams …
Chose Unbounce
As far as landing page builders go, in my opinion, Unbounce is the best and easiest to use.
Chose Unbounce
A lot of other programs needed coding or design experience. Unbounce has made it really simple to create highly effective landing pages really quickly. They are easy to integrate, and the reports are very robust for the price. Other A/B testing programs I looked at were very …
Chose Unbounce
Unbounce is much more expensive than options like LeadPages and Instapage, but the polish of the platform and functionality are lightyears ahead. The user interface is much more intuitive, the visual editor makes changing designs and layouts simple, and the form builder seems …
Chose Unbounce
Clickfunnels might be a slightly easier page builder to build within, but they have outages that are unpredictable and drove me crazy to try to work through when campaigns were running.

Wordpress has a lot of great themes and page builders available, but they each require their …
Chose Unbounce
We have not used other products like Unbounce. To be honest, once we started using Unbounce we stopped looking for a solution altogether because Unbounce ended up working out so well for us. I would say start with Unbounce and then see what you can add to make your Unbounce …
Chose Unbounce
Unbounce is just easier to use than Leadpages and has overall better integrations. The cost is on par with each other... and really, it's just a matter of preference on which platform you use. HOWEVER, I do find that the Unbounce community to be MUCH better and much more …
Chose Unbounce
In terms of pure landing page generation, Unbounce is of very high quality. We went with Unbounce over Leadpages because we felt they had more features, and the software itself was easier to use. When we moved on from Unbounce, we switched all of our landing pages over to …
Features
OpenText OptimostUnbounce
SEO and Conversion Optimization
Comparison of SEO and Conversion Optimization features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Optimost
-
Ratings
Unbounce
6.9
Ratings
11% above category average
Landing page A/B testing:00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Dynamic page text replacement00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Real-time analytics dashboard00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
SEO tools00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Optimization recommendations00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText OptimostUnbounce
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Zoho LandingPage
Zoho LandingPage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
LocaliQ
LocaliQ
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Adobe Marketo Engage
Adobe Marketo Engage
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText OptimostUnbounce
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText OptimostUnbounce
Likelihood to Recommend
The ease of implementation combined with the managed services result in a tool that virtually anyone can use - implementation is less than 10 lines of code added to the relevant pages of the website (we simply added it to our master page template to have it available on any page) and from there the customer can be as involved or not involved as they wish. At BSI we are very hands on with the testing programme - usually developing and designing the tests ourselves and having HP build them, but if we wanted to HP to develop, design and build and limit our role to QA and review that is an option.
Read full review
As I am using this platform for a long time, I believe I am happy with the services I am getting from this outstanding software. It has made my landing page experience better than ever without any coding knowledge to apply. It has upgraded my business in a positive direction and I believe I am using this software for many years to come.
Read full review
Pros
  • Because it is a managed service the need for intervention by our internal IT group was removed. This allowed us to control the pace of the testing programme without being influenced by IT resource allocation
  • The client and technical account managers are very good at suggesting tests or potential improvements
  • HP regularly holds custom forums which are always informative and provide an opportunity to learn from and network with peers and industry leaders
Read full review
  • AB testing is simple to set up. Clone a page make your changes and pit one or more against each other. Set the number of views and you're told the winner once the test is done. Simple
  • Tracking code is easy to add. Follow the straightforward instructions in the back end
  • Easy to add multiple domains to your account. So you can use the landing pages you build on numerous sites if you so desire
Read full review
Cons
  • The dashboard interface is difficult to navigate, but I understand that they are currently developing/testing a new much more user friendly interface
  • The cost can be a barrier for some organisations, but for us it is worth it. Also they are in the process of releasing a less expensive self authoring testing tool.
Read full review
  • The reporting is very basic - pretty much only A/B test comparisons. If you need more in-depth reporting you will have to use an external system.
  • Page performance isn't great. When running our landing pages through Google's Page Speed analysis tool, they did not perform well compared to landing pages we created outside of Unbounce. This was big for us because, in paid search, Google looks at your landing page quality as a factor that affects what you pay per click.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have not only renewed our subscription three years running, but we have added the self authoring tool and are looking to expand the subscription so that we can take advantage of the managed services on a global level.
Read full review
Please see comparison information and other areas of my review. We have no need for Unbounce since all of its features are available in Pardot. We would have happily continued using Unbounce if we had not purchased Marketing Automation Software
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
unbounce is a really good landing page builder and is fairly easy to use and navigate. It empowers to create and see the performance of landing pages quickly and easily, so it is ideal for marketing agencies running paid media campaigns. The landing page builder, like all of these apps, can be a little slow, but I have not found a landing builder that isnt.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Unbounce customer support is very strong. We have been able to connect with them via email and telephone mediums. They are very knowledgeable and can effectively help resolve difficult problems that are slowing us down. Overall Unbounce customer support is very professional. Our wait times have always been small or at least reasonable.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Choose a subdomain that is appropriate for multiple types of pages. You don't want to have to keep changing it. Think about using Google Tag Manager to manage your Google Analytics code and event tracking. Build one landing page to completion. Then make a copy of it if you need to create variant pages.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We evaluated Optimost again Adobe's similar offering (Target). The big difference between the two and the reason why BSI choose Autonomy was the managed service aspect. The idea that once the code was deployed on the site IT no longer had to be involved gave my team full ownership of the testing programme. With the Adobe product, the involvement of the internal IT group would have been required to launch each test - and this would have decreased the number of tests we could run each month. Back in the day I also used offermatica/omniture and this too required IT involvement.
Read full review
Despite my review for unbounce being not the greatest review or score in the world, when stacked up against its two biggest competitors, I'd prefer Unbounce over Leadpages and Instapage. Leadpages drag and drop editor, integrations, and overall UI/UX is 10x worse than unbounce and unbounce really leads in the category of nice templates and quickness to a production landing page with much better options and integrations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Use HP Optimost was the primary driver behind a 40% increase in UK classroom training courses booked online read more details here: http://www.autonomy.com/work/news/details/hsx6767d
  • HP Optimost testing led to a 9% increase in sales by improving the BSI Shop's checkout funnel in 2012
  • HP Optimost is integral to the success of BSI's continuous improvement testing programme
Read full review
  • We use this to address our graphic design needs for simple things such as landing pages, poo-ups, and announcement bars. It let's us work on these things without having to always get our designer or tech team involved.
  • With all of the GDPR changes we have really leaned on unbounce to help us create pages to gather list. Using landing pages to have users submit their information is super helpful and it makes it easy to automate the list building process.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Unbounce Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of 100+ Landing Page TemplateScreenshot of Responsive Drag-and-Drop Landing Page BuilderScreenshot of Account Overview and Testing Features (Smart Traffic and A/B Testing)Screenshot of AMP Landing Page Templates