TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText UFT One vs. Selenium

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText UFT One

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AUnified Functional Testing (UFT, formerly known as HP UFT and before that QuickTest Professional or HP QTP) is a functional and performance testing tool acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, now from OpenText.N/A

    Selenium

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ASelenium is open source software for browser automation, primarily used for functional, load, or performance testing of applications.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText UFT OneSelenium
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText UFT OneSelenium
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText UFT OneSelenium
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    Chose OpenText UFT One
    Since Selenium is restricted to only Web based applications it isn't suitable for our project which has Mainframe and desktop based applications in majority. Selenium is open source and free so it can be preferred for some projects
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText UFT One

    We need to look at open source tools if the team has time to learn like Selenium.

    Selenium can integrate with just about anything to give you a robust framework such as Maven for source code compilation, Test NG to drive tests, Jenkins or Hudson to integrate into a Continuous …

    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText UFT One
    HP UFT is an excellent tool for test automation; very flexible and powerful. It is much more intuitive than and easier to use than Selenium, however, the only downside when compared side by side with freelance tools like Selenium is the pricing. Selenium can be acquired for …
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText UFT One
    UFT has the advantages of supporting different types of technologies. Different competitive tools were not able to support the wide range of technologies which UFT does. UFT has a strong history and has been ranked one among all the Test Automation tools for quite some time. …
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText UFT One
    The only real competitor is Selenium but the simple ease and advanced features of UFT won out during the selection process. Also the ability to test against non-web based applications can come in handy.
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText UFT One
    Most of the test tools are similar in nature to what they do. Every tool has its own quirks, making them necessary to understand how and what they do, before we get to start using them; which also happens to be the key to good automation testing. Considering the HP toolset, …
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText UFT One
    [My] company uses UFT across different projects and different departments for all types of testing and automation.
    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText UFT One
    Since this tool is licensed most of the work is performed by the tool and one needs to just record or create basic script and it should be running in no time
    Incentivized
    Open Source
    Chose Selenium
    Customers are always spending less cost on tools and prefer open-source tools which leverage all applications Can be tailored your framework in selenium according to application Moreover CI/CD pipeline is easy in selenium compared to other tools Can be built custom test …
    Incentivized
    Chose Selenium
    Selenium is way better than those two as it's free and has great community support.
    Incentivized
    Chose Selenium
    UFT is a paid tool from microfocus and able to automated alomsts all platforms but there is Fee for licensed versions software. TOSCA is also a paid tool from Tricentis which does not require coding skills from tester and implements mode based automation. where as selenium is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Selenium
    TestComplete is more like an enterprise automation testing tool, that consists of many built-in functions. The license is rather expensive https://smartbear.com/product/testcomplete/pricing/. TestComplete's user community is not as large as Selenium user. Smartbear's …
    Incentivized
    Chose Selenium
    HQ UFT, it is one of the best and has more abilities but it is too much expensive while Selenium is free.
    SmartBear TestComplete, same reason as UFT.
    Watir, it is a Selenium-like open source project but has less features and limited documentation.
    Incentivized
    Chose Selenium
    Selenium supports more browsers, selenium has huge open source community, and, best of all, it's free
    Incentivized
    Chose Selenium
    HP UFT vs. Selenium - the major difference is that Selenium is free and open source. So there is a lot of money saved upfront on licensing - moreover with UFT/QTP VB scripting is a must and VB is not a very flexible language, is outdated and is a hard skill to find these days.
    Incentivized
    Chose Selenium
    It is one of the leading open source tools with lot of good features to go well with web automation.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    OpenText UFT OneSelenium
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (11 ratings)
    9.2
    (55 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.3
    (11 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)