OpenText Vertica vs. SkySQL

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Vertica
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
The Vertica Analytics Platform supplies enterprise data warehouses with big data analytics capabilities and modernization. Vertica is owned and supported by OpenText.N/A
SkySQL
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
SkySQL, or MariaDB Cloud, is a database-as-a-service (DBaaS) from MariaDB, that brings capabilities in the MariaDB Platform to the cloud, combining enterprise features and support. The vendor describes it as built for mission-critical applications and enterprise governance, and state that SkySQL augments automation with the human expertise needed to support and manage mission-critical deployments in the cloud – whether it’s a single development database or thousands of production databases.
$0.45
per hour
Pricing
OpenText VerticaSkySQL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Sky-4x15 - General Purpose
$0.450
per hour
Sky-4x26 - High Memory
$0.630
per hour
Sky-8x30 - General Purpose
$0.900
per hour
Sky-8x52 - High Memory
$1.270
per hour
Sky-16x60 - General Purpose
$1.810
per hour
Sky-16x104 - High Memory
$2.530
per hour
Sky-32x120 - General Purpose
$3.610
per hour
Sky-32x208 - High Memory
$5.070
per hour
Sky-64x240 - General Purpose
$7.202
per hour
Sky-64x416 - High Memory
$10.14
per hour
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText VerticaSkySQL
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText VerticaSkySQL
User Ratings
OpenText VerticaSkySQL
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText VerticaSkySQL
Likelihood to Recommend
As someone just starting out with data analytics and warehousing vertica is a great tool for a small scale business. It has amazing performance and can scale upto TBs of data. It works well for any organization which has about 100 - 500 DAUs of the system. The system doesn't require a lot of ops overhead. Scaling for PB data and 1000s of DAU is vertica's weak point. The system is just not designed for large scale usage and still has a long way to go to improve scalability. There are experiments to run Vertica query engine on top of HDFS which seem promising, however - if you have the the Hadoop ecosystem you are better off going the HDFS + Presto/Impala/SparkSQL route. But if you are in the Hadoop ecosystem, you probably are already investing a lot in ops.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Column-oriented storage organization, which increases performance of queries.
  • Compression, which reduces storage costs and I/O bandwidth. High compression is possible because columns of homogeneous datatypes are stored together and because updates to the main store are batched.
  • Shared nothing architecture, which reduces system contention for shared resources and allows gradual degradation of performance in the face of hardware failure.
  • Easy to use and maintain through automated data replication, server recovery, query optimization, and storage optimization.
  • Support for standard programming interfaces ODBC, JDBC, ADO.NET, and OLEDB.
  • Integration to Hadoop with the capability to perform analytics on ORC and Parquet files directly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • One time, one of the nodes wasn't coming up because of some ambiguity with the local data. Vertica wasn't able to fix it by itself and we were trying to remove the node out of the database and we couldn't do it. It would be great if that could be addressed. Luckily when we rebooted the whole server, some of the dead transaction got flushed because of which vertica was able to recover and the node came up.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
HP/Micro Focus Vertica support is in par with other bigger vendors. In addition to this, there is enough best practices documentation available for some of the most common ways you will use Vertica that makes it easy to get Vertica up and running.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
MySQL and MS SQL Server are both fantastic RDBMS products. MS SQL Server goes a bit further since it has the builtin analytical functions. But it only scales so far. Once the data goes beyond capacity, getting results out just does not happen anymore. IBM Netezza and Teradata were both appliances that required different expertise than we had in house. Vertica was able to do the same, and in some cases better, on commodity hardware (frankly in our case old servers that were slated for recycling!) and at a small scale. In other words, Vertica we could grow slowly over time. Infobright is a great log processing database but for the functions we were looking to serve it just didn't have some of the features Vertica had that we felt were show stoppers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Vertica increased our productivity in analyzing the data and validating simple proof of concepts with our data.
  • Results of analytical queries produced from Vertica are used by all departments as well as part of some of our products.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

SkySQL Screenshots

Screenshot of instance, Storage, ReplicasScreenshot of Sky Ai agentsScreenshot of Serverless Single NodeScreenshot of Monitoring