OpenText Vertica vs. Velocity

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Vertica
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
The Vertica Analytics Platform supplies enterprise data warehouses with big data analytics capabilities and modernization. Vertica is owned and supported by OpenText.N/A
Velocity
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
OpenText VerticaVelocity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText VerticaVelocity
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText VerticaVelocity
Considered Both Products
OpenText Vertica
Chose OpenText Vertica
Vertica performs well when the query has good stats and is tuned well. Options for GUI clients are ugly and outdated. IO optimized: it's a columnar store with no indexing structures to maintain like traditional databases. The indexing is achieved by storing the data sorted on …
Chose OpenText Vertica
We have been evaluating Greenplum comparing with Vertica.
Chose OpenText Vertica
SAP HANA, Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL are too heavyweight for achieving real-time latency requirements. Google BigQuery is limited to Cloud that makes hard to integrate with a large ingestion pipeline that may have both Cloud-based and on-prem components. Hadoop is much more …
Chose OpenText Vertica
MySQL and MS SQL Server are both fantastic RDBMS products. MS SQL Server goes a bit further since it has the builtin analytical functions. But it only scales so far. Once the data goes beyond capacity, getting results out just does not happen anymore. IBM Netezza and …
Chose OpenText Vertica
Presto would be a good solution that would be less expensive and would also allow direct querying of all our data on Hadoop while maintaining good speed.
Chose OpenText Vertica
Vertica is great for small low complex queries and has great query performance over the other technologies that I have worked with.
Vertica fails to Hive wrt scalability and resource isolation, where Hive exploits hadoop's resource isolation.
Presto is almost comparable to …
Chose OpenText Vertica
Vertica is much easier to manage; is just software (i.e. vs. Netezza), easier to scale and extend, with a very powerful query execution engine and storage layer. While other solutions (e.g. Greenplum) are just postgres clones that were extended to run at scale but still keep …
Velocity

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
OpenText VerticaVelocity
Small Businesses
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Score 8.5 out of 10
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Exadata
Oracle Exadata
Score 10.0 out of 10
Oracle Exadata
Oracle Exadata
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText VerticaVelocity
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText VerticaVelocity
Likelihood to Recommend
As someone just starting out with data analytics and warehousing vertica is a great tool for a small scale business. It has amazing performance and can scale upto TBs of data. It works well for any organization which has about 100 - 500 DAUs of the system. The system doesn't require a lot of ops overhead. Scaling for PB data and 1000s of DAU is vertica's weak point. The system is just not designed for large scale usage and still has a long way to go to improve scalability. There are experiments to run Vertica query engine on top of HDFS which seem promising, however - if you have the the Hadoop ecosystem you are better off going the HDFS + Presto/Impala/SparkSQL route. But if you are in the Hadoop ecosystem, you probably are already investing a lot in ops.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Column-oriented storage organization, which increases performance of queries.
  • Compression, which reduces storage costs and I/O bandwidth. High compression is possible because columns of homogeneous datatypes are stored together and because updates to the main store are batched.
  • Shared nothing architecture, which reduces system contention for shared resources and allows gradual degradation of performance in the face of hardware failure.
  • Easy to use and maintain through automated data replication, server recovery, query optimization, and storage optimization.
  • Support for standard programming interfaces ODBC, JDBC, ADO.NET, and OLEDB.
  • Integration to Hadoop with the capability to perform analytics on ORC and Parquet files directly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • One time, one of the nodes wasn't coming up because of some ambiguity with the local data. Vertica wasn't able to fix it by itself and we were trying to remove the node out of the database and we couldn't do it. It would be great if that could be addressed. Luckily when we rebooted the whole server, some of the dead transaction got flushed because of which vertica was able to recover and the node came up.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
HP/Micro Focus Vertica support is in par with other bigger vendors. In addition to this, there is enough best practices documentation available for some of the most common ways you will use Vertica that makes it easy to get Vertica up and running.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
MySQL and MS SQL Server are both fantastic RDBMS products. MS SQL Server goes a bit further since it has the builtin analytical functions. But it only scales so far. Once the data goes beyond capacity, getting results out just does not happen anymore. IBM Netezza and Teradata were both appliances that required different expertise than we had in house. Vertica was able to do the same, and in some cases better, on commodity hardware (frankly in our case old servers that were slated for recycling!) and at a small scale. In other words, Vertica we could grow slowly over time. Infobright is a great log processing database but for the functions we were looking to serve it just didn't have some of the features Vertica had that we felt were show stoppers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Vertica increased our productivity in analyzing the data and validating simple proof of concepts with our data.
  • Results of analytical queries produced from Vertica are used by all departments as well as part of some of our products.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots