OpenText Web CMS vs. Percussion CMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with TeamSite, users can: Capture diverse digital audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…N/A
Percussion CMS
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Percussion Software's content management system is used by higher education, government agencies, and business organizations - SMB to Enterprise. Marketers use Percussion CMS to create, publish, and share multi-channel content.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Web CMSPercussion CMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Web CMSPercussion CMS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Web CMSPercussion CMS
Considered Both Products
OpenText Web CMS
Chose OpenText Web CMS
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
OpenText TeamSite has been more powerful and resourceful as compared to Storyblok. The cost of deployment was relatively low and it has more content editing features. The customer support team members are always online 24/7/367 and they offer the best training of working with …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
It offers an intuitive user experience, modern, versatile and consistent in performance. It simplifies the whole process of managing the digital experience across all marketing channels, which is done from a unified interface. This tool has enabled us to take control of our …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
OpenText went through an RFP process against IBM Content Management back in 2012. OpenText not only met our business and technical requirements, but we asked both vendors to show a use case and OpenText provided an extensive solution that IBM could not. Also the content …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
Elasticsearch is scalable, ready for cloud deployments, and documentation is readily available and comprehensive.

Our using HP Autonomy is based on the sunk cost fallacy.
Percussion CMS
Chose Percussion CMS
No contest. I can't wait to get off of Percussion CMS.
Features
OpenText Web CMSPercussion CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
Ratings
6% above category average
Percussion CMS
3.0
Ratings
92% below category average
Role-based user permissions8.60 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Percussion CMS
1.0
Ratings
153% below category average
API8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language7.20 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Percussion CMS
3.0
Ratings
88% below category average
WYSIWYG editor7.80 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness7.70 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Admin section8.10 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Page templates7.40 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Library of website themes8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.10 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Form generator8.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
Ratings
7% above category average
Percussion CMS
1.6
Ratings
128% below category average
Content taxonomy7.90 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Bulk management8.20 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions7.50 Ratings1.00 Ratings
SEO support00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Web CMSPercussion CMS
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Web CMSPercussion CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
3.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Web CMSPercussion CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Read full review
Best suited for large organizations where everyone knows how to deal with Java in an increasingly Java unfriendly world. Said organization should be willing to pay a huge price for a piece of dinosaur technology
Read full review
Pros
  • Offering compelling experiences to customers, which help in improving satisfaction
  • Information is delivered across multiple channels
  • Testing relevant result sets to improve the rate of website conversion
Read full review
  • Separate CMS environment publishes to remote server environment - great for security
  • Highly scalable
  • Full scale workflow allows for custom routing, approving, etc..
Read full review
Cons
  • I have recommendation for improvements.
  • It is easy to work with all the features.
  • All necessary content management tools are included.
Read full review
  • One word: JAVA! We don't live in the 1990's anymore! An AJAX/DHTML environment seems a long time coming.
  • Horrible end-user experience, learning curve. Our end users' inability to easily use the archaic, Java-based interface, means they send the web developer their content requests. This creates a huge bottleneck and completely defeats the purpose of a CMS.
  • Image mangement and integration with content is aweful and time consuming. An image processing tool called ImedImage was developed for Percussion at one point, and left completely stagnant with very little support.
  • Implementation is extremely complicated, given the complexity of the system. Sure, scalability is a good thing, but there is very little out-of-the box function. Don't expect to implement a site as quickly as with other CMS platforms.
Read full review
Usability
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Read full review
No contest. I can't wait to get off of Percussion CMS.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
  • Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
  • We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
  • We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.
Read full review
  • We are locked into Percussion CMS simply due to the expense and complexity of migrating to another solution (and the lack of time and budget to do so). I long for the day when I am no longer required to support Percussion CMS, to say the least.
Read full review
ScreenShots