Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management vs. Vena

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a solution that helps users model and plan across finance, HR, supply chain, and sales, streamline the financial close process.
$250
per user/per month
Vena
Score 8.7 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Pricing
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance ManagementVena
Editions & Modules
EPM Standard
$250
per user/per month
EPM Enterprise
$500
per user/per month
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance ManagementVena
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle EPM Cloud solution. Please see pricing information for the EPM Cloud components on cloud.oracle.com or contact Oracle Sales at +1.800.633.0738.The Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance ManagementVena
Considered Both Products
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Anaplan and OneStream
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle EPM did a fabulous job in our webinars and focused demos.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Hyperion System 11, Blackline, Coupa, PeopleSoft, Oracle HCM
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Cloud EPM is the more useful application. It also provides more functions and possibilities.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
It is a great product for Dashboarding and story telling. It is adding value to the Corporate Finance and Data Governance Teams when used together with EPM Cloud.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Cloud EPM is the more useful application. It also provides more functions and possibilities.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud fared very well against Adaptive, Anaplan, and Host Analytics. We ultimately decided on Oracle due to its reputation and strength of existing customers. We are happy with our decision.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
EPM was the only product we have evaluated.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Enterprise Planning Cloud has a well-defined objective for financial users with their budgeting and forecasting. We don't have another tool to do this with our core ERP cloud. Excel Smartview capability provides users with an easy user interface for doing their day to …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We used to use Prophix before we switched over to Oracle EPM Cloud. In general, Oracle EPM Cloud and Prophix have similar feature offerings, but Oracle EPM takes advantage of the current major leading technologies. We chose EPM Cloud since we needed to access the Cloud through …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
OneStream XF and .NET
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
It pretty much stands shoulder to shoulder with other businesses offering the same service.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle EPM Cloud is much more user-friendly when compared to Prophix. Oracle's Smart View, compared to Prophix Excel plug-ins, is a lot more flexible.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We haven't evaludated any other products in planing area.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
EPM has better service provided by tech support. Training is much better than others we compared.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
None at this time.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle was far better than any other products we looked at.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We selected it because it is efficient in almost 98 percent of our organizational needs.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
We have not evaluated other products.
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
The interactions with other cubes needs to be improved. Availability of more cubes and cell limits would improve functionality in Oracle EPM - EPBCS
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is one of the more robust and well-rounded EPMs on the market. It comes with robust out-of-the-box functionality which is a great benefit in comparison to its peers. The Excel integration is also top notch which Financial Analysts really …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
OneStream is a very young product and young company, however, it offers a singular platform for both budgeting and consolidation. In addition, Onestream is not built on Essbase (a product that is rather old) and therefore has more dynamic capabilities. OneStream does not, …
Chose Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Access did not seem user-friendly and did not have the security we required. Oracle Planning has robust security and is easy to get used to and use.
Vena
Chose Vena
Vena also allows for much more dynamic report building and refresh rather than manual updates throughout reports. The user interface is also much easier to understand compared to Oracle, which allows new users to adopt faster and get familiar with Vena. Overall, Vena is …
Chose Vena
Vena is much faster than other such software which is available in market. If we talking about pricing $$$ so Vena is affordable to smaller companies also. it's help us quicker integrations with other software and User Interface is much better than other software. Vena gives …
Chose Vena
We found Vena to be much more intuitive and easy to leverage with our existing models and templates we've built in Excel already. It allowed our finance and ops teams to get traction and value from the solution much faster than we felt the other CPM solutions we looked at.
Chose Vena
Both the softwares have effectively been integrated together to make my job as an analyst easier. This helps in generating accurate data interpretations and led to better results in sales of our products and improved client services and feedback.
Chose Vena
I guess they both compliment each other by integration and by both checks I can get the accuracy in result. And growth in sales by finding the key parameters where we need to work.
Chose Vena
Vena Solutions stands out due to its familiar Excel-based interface, making it easy for our team to adopt without extensive training. Compared to alternatives like Anaplan and Oracle Hyperion, Vena's strong customer support and efficient automation have significantly reduced …
Chose Vena
Vena stands out from competitors due to its seamless Excel integration, which allows us to leverage a tool we are already familiar with while adding automation, collaboration, and advanced financial planning. Unlike some platforms that require fully new systems, Vena's …
Chose Vena
Data Rails is similar to Vena but easier to use and at a lower price. Historically, ERP systems provided much of what we used Vena for. That currently is not the case and these additional subscriptions are necessary. What used to be a simple process that required little …
Chose Vena
In comparison to its competitors what has helped Vena stack up against them is its wide range of solutions in specific. Having a curated group of solutions, powered with IT-backed automation, integration with 365 and compliance with the latest trends and legal formulations is …
Chose Vena
We did not evaluate any other products. We knew we wanted to embrace, not replace, excel, and Vena is best in class as a CPM tool that leverages Excel as a lens into the database.
Chose Vena
Excel is the window into Vena's platform so it makes it familiar and scalable.
Chose Vena
Ultimately we decided on Vena because of the Excel interface which we knew would improve adoption. We also like the platform agnostic integration and easy-to-use web interface. The OLAP cube was also appealing to allow for a variety of pivoted reports.
Chose Vena
Our data is too large for Power BI desktop and our ERP, D365, does not have an easy or clean way to get our budget entered.
Chose Vena
We had quotes from three different companies including Vena. Even with a higher pricing, Vena made the best impression with a powerful software and a solid solution. With another competitor, we would have to engage a bookkeeper to support our consolidation. Vena didnt …
Chose Vena
Tableau is by far the best tool I've used. Vena in comparison is very good but it's missing the master data link to SAP, and the ability of data to refresh when the hierarchies move. It's also lacking standard reports on system set up like basic P&L's, etc. It's also missing …
Chose Vena
we used Fiserv AML Risk and MPC. Risk was used for ALM (we will still need to find another solution for this as Vena does not offer this). We also used Fiserv MPC for budgeting and forecasting. This system was extrmely inefficient and provided us with many complications and …
Chose Vena
apart from excel this is the only software that I have used that uses this type of financial modeling
Chose Vena
Vena being a Excel add in makes it very attractive. Also, there are certain features that Vena had was very fascinating compared to their competitors. It was easy for users to grasp it as it looked and worked just as Excel.
Features
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance ManagementVena
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.6
Ratings
31% below category average
Vena
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.10 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Customizable dashboards4.40 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates4.40 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
Ratings
12% above category average
Vena
7.6
Ratings
7% below category average
Drill-down analysis9.70 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.60 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.40 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.0
Ratings
9% above category average
Vena
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web9.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.90 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Report Versioning9.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling9.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.9
Ratings
25% below category average
Vena
7.7
Ratings
1% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization6.80 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Predictive Analytics5.10 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
Ratings
5% above category average
Vena
8.3
Ratings
5% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.30 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.90 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.30 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
Ratings
8% below category average
Vena
7.3
Ratings
7% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access6.20 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.8
Ratings
6% above category average
Vena
8.1
Ratings
2% below category average
Long-term financial planning9.20 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.70 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Forecasting8.90 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Scenario modeling8.60 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Management reporting7.80 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
Ratings
13% above category average
Vena
7.5
Ratings
6% below category average
Financial data consolidation9.80 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.70 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.90 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.90 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Minority Ownership8.60 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting9.70 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.20 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Vena
8.0
Ratings
1% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting9.60 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Management Reporting7.90 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting8.40 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting7.80 Ratings7.50 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing8.50 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
Vena
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Personalized dashboards8.20 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.70 Ratings8.60 Ratings
KPIs7.40 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis6.70 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.10 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data8.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
Ratings
9% above category average
Vena
8.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Flat file integration9.60 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Excel data integration9.60 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.20 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance ManagementVena
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance ManagementVena
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance ManagementVena
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited in a geographically distributed environment where you have various key participants in multiple time zones providing input and necessary explanations on performance and measured success It is less appropriate where you have a single office environment with a single finance department working together. It is also less suited when the GL is NOT an Oracle product and the interface between the GL and the reporting software needs to be implemented with utmost care and handling.
Read full review
Whether you have processes you are looking to make more efficient or starting from scratch, Vena is a great tool to handle both. When we started with Vena all of reporting was either very manual or frankly nonexistent. Vena was pivotal in bringing us from zero to 10 in a short time. it helped us streamline the process of gathering data to the end reporting
Read full review
Pros
  • Account Reconciliation CLoud Services provides tight integration with Oracle R12 and 11i . Provides drillback capability. It is flexible and provides rich functionality to users.
  • We have implemented ARCS on cloud and migrated planning and budgeting from On premise to PBCS and EPBCS. Functionality is onpar with onpremise. Provides regular updates monthly
  • We don't need to upgrades every year and saved a lot on Hardware.
Read full review
  • What i like best about Vena is that it is very seamless Excel integration.
  • Vena fosters collabs across teams, helping multiple members to work together on financial planning in real-time enhancing overall efficiency.
  • We now also can automate manual processes like budgeting, consolidation of data and reporting saves my valuable time and also reducing the risk of errors.
Read full review
Cons
  • Our implementation consultant set up all the business rules for calculations to get us live, and we may have difficulty setting up new ones going forward. We feel like that we now need to hire someone who has the technical knowledge to help us to manage the system going forward.
Read full review
  • It could improve the ease of implementation; it could take a long for an inexperienced IT team.
  • From the ERP system perspective, it can be linked easily, but it has room for improvement when you make core changes and require a Vena specialist again.
  • Some administrators can get confused while working on Excel implementation; it has complicated technical requirements.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have a pretty good userbase who are at the high level who gained value from this tool. Discontinuing this tool is prone to impact their day to day operations. Also the data in this tool cannot alter the source, which maintains the integrity of this tool. Smartview is a cool addition that gained lot of traction as well.
Read full review
It saves me so much time - to go back I would have to hire multiple people to achieve the same results. It is a cost effective tool for our uses and continues to pay for itself in time savings.
Read full review
Usability
It produces consolidated multi currency reports faster and more accurately whilst adding additional pivotal functionality. The Smartview reporting is a key for us and a flagstone of the application
Read full review
This is split between usability from an end-user perspective and administrative. Administrative - The tool is lacking in a cohesive way to administer the tool, both from more of a back-end perspective (ETL/Integrations, scripting, etc.) as well as from a business administrative (Processes, Models, etc.). On the more back-end IT related aspects, the tool is a mishmash of modules that were clearly developed in stovepipe fashion. Basic feature/functionality aspects such as version control, auto vs manual save, etc. differ between the code preparation components. It is also lacking in any sort of coherent version control. Not all pages display the context information, so extreme caution must be used. There is also no coherent migration strategy. The process and model navigation has been somewhat challenging for our business administrators, often requiring assistance from Vena when creating or altering templates. 2 of 10 End User - This is better. The Excel add-in generally functions well. Creating basic templates is straightforward, and there is a large degree of flexibility when creating reporting templates. Being part of Excel puts many users into a comfort zone. The toggle switch between template and data mode is not well conceived, and the add-in pop-ups occasionally have issues on multi-monitor displays. 6 of 10
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
EPM has been so far available all the time
Read full review
Vena has been available and running. There are notifications well ahead of scheduled maintenance and so far, scheduled maintenance has been occurring during off hours and fortunately has not occurred during a time that is crucial for us to be actively using.
Read full review
Performance
The product performance is so far very good
Read full review
Vena Solutions pages load quickly and only a few times does it get a bit slow, only when there are many integrations and the reports are long. But in general it is always fast and honestly I am very satisfied with the speed in the generation of statistical reports and the pages
Read full review
Support Rating
Support from our implementation partner is a 10/10, but support from Oracle is awful. Case in point: recently over a 2-day period, there were a series of intermittent outages. Oracle actually asked US for the outage time-stamps. I would have thought that, since we were paying them, they should probably be able to tell us!
Read full review
From initiate setup to going live, Vena's customer representatives and technicians have proven to be responsive and enthusiastic in getting our company up and running. They have been patient with our questions and frustrations and worked to troubleshoot issues that have come up.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
Our initial in person training was a little rough b/c I felt like our trainer wanted to focus on maximizing Vena rather than understanding what we were needing for our organization. He was very responsive and added insights, but could have worked to understand our needs a little better.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
The biggest key is data validation time. If you are implementing a new chart of accounts along with Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud, you need to multiply the time you think you can perform data validation by 2. The key to managing your project timeline is managing your expectations around data validation as well. For instance, it is recommended you convert 1-3 years vs. 5 years.
Read full review
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is one of the more robust and well-rounded EPMs on the market. It comes with robust out-of-the-box functionality which is a great benefit in comparison to its peers. The Excel integration is also top notch which Financial Analysts really appreciate. Cost is a little high and maintenance is a bit heaver than other tools so that is something to consider. The product keeps improving!
Read full review
Vena Solutions stands out due to its familiar Excel-based interface, making it easy for our team to adopt without extensive training. Compared to alternatives like Anaplan and Oracle Hyperion, Vena's strong customer support and efficient automation have significantly reduced our budgeting cycle time. We chose Vena for its seamless integration with our existing systems and substantial time-saving benefits, ultimately enhancing our decision-making process.
Read full review
Scalability
The product is scalable
Read full review
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Significantly reduced the amount of money we spent for the maintenance of in-house hardware.
  • We now need less employees to manage the configurations of Oracle EPM Cloud.
  • There have been many time savings as a whole to apply to more productive causes.
Read full review
  • Eliminated the necessity to manually combine multiple Excel budget worksheets into one file in order to compile an org-wide budget
  • Allows end-users to be self-sufficient by having the ability to drill into transaction-level detail and conduct ad-hoc analyses
  • Created more bandwidth in the FP&A team to spend more time on more meaningful analysis
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise DeploymentScreenshot of Planning and Forecasting - Decision-Oriented Plans with Instant Feedback Loop - What-If Modeling and SandboxScreenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of User Interface - Role-Based, Intuitive User Interface - Role-Based Navigation Flows - Microsoft Office InterfaceScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise Deployment

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard