| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Oracle Primavera | Score7.7 out of 10 | N/A | Oracle’s Primavera is a software suite designed for construction and other asset-intensive industries. It contains a variety of project planning, management, and execution components for buyers to select from. | N/A |
| Oracle Primavera | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Oracle Primavera | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Oracle Primavera Oracle is better laid out and has more functionality as well as end-user flow. The login process, billing, and construction management features are easy to find, easy to use, and helpful. The limitations on Quickbooks restrict users from the ability to view and bill full … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Oracle Primavera We use Oracle ERP and are happy with it. We have long-standing relationship with Oracle and our workforce is well versed with it. We wanted a high-end scalable software for construction projects and Primavera fits the bill. Payment systems like Textura can be easily integrated … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Oracle Primavera P6 advantage has better enterprise portfolio features. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Oracle Primavera I have also used Microsoft Project in the past to do scheduling. While easier to use than Primavera, it does not have the same capabilities to determine CPM. Furthermore, it would not be appropriate for larger sized projects. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Oracle Primavera I did not select Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management. It was an inherent application. Having used other applications, compared to those, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a far superior tool for portfolio management. However, in the span of the last 10 years, there … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Oracle Primavera they are completely different programs Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Oracle Primavera When compared to the likes of the field, Oracle is the least friendly in regards to being accessible to the team with Smartsheet working the most favorably in that aspect. Otherwise, Oracle's PM program is more intuitive than Microsoft Project, has more features when compared … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Oracle Primavera | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 |
| Usability | 8.0 |
