TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle WebLogic Server

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AOracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A

    Red Hat JBoss EAP

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    Oracle WebLogic ServerRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle WebLogic ServerRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Oracle WebLogic ServerRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Considered Both Products
    Oracle
    Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
    Red Hat JBoss EAP is good and open source. We chose Oracle WebLogic because we are using Oracle products like Oracle Enterprise Manager and it's very easy to integrate WebLogic with it. Also, for our mission critical applications, we wanted an application server with great …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
    Oracle Weblogic Application Server gains its reputation from the performance, easy of maintenance, to be compared with the competitor solutions. However, Weblogic is "all-in-on" solution, sometimes it is too fat for some business needs that only requires part of the full …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
    Compared to the alternatives, Weblogic is on the heavier side and requires more configuration to get it running. Instance startup time is also relatively long, but this could be due to the application size deployed on the server. Licensing cost for WebLogic would also be higher …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
    WebLogic is clearly more powerful than Tomcat, but it's also better than JBoss, since it gives more configuration options, and the administration console is absolutely the best I've ever seen. On the other side, for small applications Tomcat is more lightweight, and more …
    Incentivized
    Red Hat
    Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP
    JBoss does practically everything Apache Tomcat and Weblogic does in terms of our requirements, but JBoss is more suited for larger enterprise J2EE apps compared to Tomcat. Boot time is not as quick as Tomcat, but still relatively fast for our deployments. The system can also …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Oracle WebLogic ServerRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of Oracle WebLogic Server and Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
    Feature
    Oracle WebLogic Server
    8.1
    36 Ratings
    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
    8.6
    8 Ratings
    IDE support6.032 Ratings8.18 Ratings
    Security management9.134 Ratings8.68 Ratings
    Administration and management7.136 Ratings8.18 Ratings
    Application server performance8.535 Ratings8.68 Ratings
    Installation8.036 Ratings9.58 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance10.024 Ratings8.68 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Oracle WebLogic ServerRed Hat JBoss EAP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.5
    (43 ratings)
    8.1
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.2
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.5
    (3 ratings)