Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tanzu Application Catalog

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle WebLogic Server
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
Tanzu Application Catalog
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
The Tanzu Application Catalog (or Bitnami) provides packaged applications for any platform. The platform delivers and maintains a catalog of 130+ ready-to-run server applications and development environments in partnership with cloud providers including Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Oracle, driving over 1.5 million deployments per month. Bitnami was acquired by VMware in 2019.
$0.50
per month
Pricing
Oracle WebLogic ServerTanzu Application Catalog
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
10GB
$0.50
per month
T3A Nano
$3.38
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle WebLogic ServerTanzu Application Catalog
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle WebLogic ServerTanzu Application Catalog
Considered Both Products
Oracle WebLogic Server
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I have only used WebSphere for an evaluation period but I felt it was even harder to learn and it's cost was going to be bigger in the long run. Oracle WebLogic Server was more like the middle ground for what we needed at the time, both in terms of costs and learning curve.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
As mentioned earlier we didn't choose Oracle WebLogic Server, but received it as part of the application we bought. After using it for a few years we found it to be a stable product that has a bit of a learning curve compared to Microsoft IIS but is as stable and maybe even …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I wasn't involved in selecting the server we were using but in our team we've made some efforts to improve the local deployment process by trying some other Applicational servers too.
Apache Tomcat was a more lightweight solution for sure, and it coped well with our applications …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle Weblogic Application Server is very robust and has good features and stability. It is a very sought-after tool for deploying many kinds of applications.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like apache tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We have no option because we need it to use Oracle Forms, but we have used Jboss and tomcat in other projects and Weblogic is more stable.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache Tomcat, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and IBM WebSphere Application Server on Cloud
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is a leading server side container. It is far superior than IBM's WebSphere application server, JBOSS or Tomcat server. The easiness of using Oracle's weblogic application server is much user friendly and also it has great support and user …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle Weblogic Application Server gains its reputation from the performance, easy of maintenance, to be compared with the competitor solutions. However, Weblogic is "all-in-on" solution, sometimes it is too fat for some business needs that only requires part of the full …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
The main competitor is Wildfly and Websphere. The choice it's all about the bundled cost regarding the chosen OS and Java vendor. All three are almost the same in terms of performance and features. An exceptional alternative from the OSS ecosystem is Payara. Payra has some …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is much more stable when compared to opensource application servers like Oracle GlassFish Server or Apache Tomcat. Coming to JBoss Enterprise Application Server, Oracle WebLogic Application Server has better support with most of the cloud …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I used them in different contexts.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache Tomcat requires a lot of out-of-the-box set-up that is difficult to work with, especially when it comes to production-ready configurations. The only advantage it has over Oracle WLS is that it's free, which is probably why many commercial server products are bundled with …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache tomcat is used by the group of developers in our organization but the major student ERP production systems do run on WebLogic due to its feature-rich nature and stability. Although the cost is considered a hindrance to its wider use.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We use Oracle Commerce Cloud as well.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Best support of JEE specifications.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We are using OBIEE application and when we install an application it is installed automatically with the application. We selected the WebLogic Server for better administration and maintenance of the application. It is very important for us to keep our production application up …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
WebSphere is another major contender and they have pitching and are more updated/streamlined. I still prefer WebLogic from an administrator standpoint. Support is much better and there are more options for finding answers to issues or new features.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Red Hat JBoss EAP is good and open source. We chose Oracle WebLogic because we are using Oracle products like Oracle Enterprise Manager and it's very easy to integrate WebLogic with it. Also, for our mission critical applications, we wanted an application server with great …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Compared to the alternatives, Weblogic is on the heavier side and requires more configuration to get it running. Instance startup time is also relatively long, but this could be due to the application size deployed on the server. Licensing cost for WebLogic would also be higher …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We tested Red Hat JBoss. Then we decided to use WebLogic because of support issues we had with the other.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Performance is better with heavy workloads.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache Tomcat, Oracle GlassFish Server and Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Tanzu Application Catalog
Chose Tanzu Application Catalog
At first, another of the options that we considered was AMPPS, another application for AMP installations, however we quickly discarded it when we met with VMware Application Catalog (Bitnami), mainly due to the number of apps it handled, more than anything because it had all …
Chose Tanzu Application Catalog
Bitnami provides more solutions
Chose Tanzu Application Catalog
VMware Application Catalog (Bitnami) offers better tools to complete the task faster and more efficiently. The customer support and knowledge base is also well presented and trained.
Chose Tanzu Application Catalog
Bitnami blows them away on all fronts--their products, their knowledgeable staff, and their tools that allow us to complete the job quickly.
Features
Oracle WebLogic ServerTanzu Application Catalog
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Oracle WebLogic Server
8.1
Ratings
2% above category average
Tanzu Application Catalog
-
Ratings
IDE support6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Oracle WebLogic Server
-
Ratings
Tanzu Application Catalog
8.1
Ratings
1% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle WebLogic ServerTanzu Application Catalog
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle WebLogic ServerTanzu Application Catalog
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle WebLogic ServerTanzu Application Catalog
Likelihood to Recommend
I see Oracle WebLogic Application Server being appropriate when an application needs several different data sources and messaging providers configured and accessible, with a configured level of control of resources (connection pools) and timeouts. It is also advisable to create distributed resources that you can configure as always active to provide more processing power, or as failover for situations of availability in case of disaster recovery, for example. An application where the number of required resources configured is very small and almost non-changeable, and no scalability is required, some other options exist in the market with less cost.
Read full review
VMware Application Catalog (Bitnami) is well-suited for the following scenarios: - Organizations with many users and a limited IT staff: This product allows them to quickly and easily make a variety of applications available to their users, without having to manually install and configure each one. - Organizations with a need to deploy a wide range of open-source applications in a virtual environment: The product allows for easy discovery, download, and deployment of a wide range of popular open-source applications to a virtual machine. - Organizations that operate in a hybrid or multi-cloud environment: The product allows for deployment of applications to virtual machines running on-premises or in the cloud, depending on the organization's needs and infrastructure. On the other hand, VMware Application Catalog (Bitnami) may be less appropriate for the following scenarios: - Organizations that primarily use proprietary or closed-source applications: As the product is limited to open-source applications, it may not be suitable for organizations that primarily use proprietary or closed-source applications. - Organizations that require a high degree of customizability for their applications: The product offers limited customizability options for the applications once deployed, which may not be suitable for organizations that require a high degree of customizability. - Organizations that have strict regulatory compliance requirements: The open-source nature of the product may make it less appropriate for organizations that have strict regulatory compliance requirements, as it may not have the same level of support and security as proprietary software.
Read full review
Pros
  • I love that the weblogic dashboard allows you to manage applications and see the status of each application.
  • Oracle WebLogic Application Server simplifies usage periods in the development and production of business applications.
  • Oracle WebLogic Server allows me to define various aspects of data source entry, including creating a specific multiple connection to facilitate data entry.
  • Performance and administration are highlighted in weblogic.
Read full review
  • pre-packaged templates they provide.
  • ease of cloud-deployment of your projects.
  • The development community page always has useful information and there is a lot of support.
Read full review
Cons
  • The Admin UI should be further simplified, the UI design was not too user-friendly— too many options and clicks required, difficult for the new beginners to figure out what they are looking for.
  • The admin server becomes the single failure point, although Oracle suggested some workarounds by setting VIP and VHost, it was not quite easy and straight forward.
  • Domain replication is hard, requiring a lot of knowledge and scripts efforts.
  • Admin will hang if the node manager communication encounters some issues for one or some nodes in the domain/cluster.
  • Not able to kill/terminate the stuck thread, the only way is to restart the managed server (JVM)
  • License cost is too high, for small businesses.
Read full review
  • Possibility to configure the implementation through mobile devices
  • Sometimes the performance of the VMs is slower than expected
  • A best way to do the upgrades, you have reinstall and reconfigure in this process
Read full review
Usability
Oracle WebLogic Server has so many features that sometimes it's hard to find the right place to setup things, I think the dated user interface does not help with that either. This has a direct impact when deciding to use it as your application server, you'd need to have the right people and invest the time needed to master it. If you're application justifies it then it will definitely be a great choice in the long run.
Read full review
Most of it is intuitive. I think some of the awkwardness is found by new users who are unfamiliar with other software applications.
Read full review
Performance
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
They have an expert team, not just a frontline team that has learned the FAQs but a team that knows the product.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I wasn't involved in selecting the server we were using but in our team we've made some efforts to improve the local deployment process by trying some other Applicational servers too. Apache Tomcat was a more lightweight solution for sure, and it coped well with our applications needs, configuration and performance wise. Despite that, since we didn't got clearance to change that into our local servers, we kept using Weblogic to guarantee compliance between the testing environments and production.
Read full review
At first, another of the options that we considered was AMPPS, another application for AMP installations, however we quickly discarded it when we met with VMware Application Catalog (Bitnami), mainly due to the number of apps it handled, more than anything because it had all the ones we used and also the option free made it very tempting, more time in the market and more community support
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It made it easy to handle over a 100 of deployments across multiple nodes every quarter.
  • It was easy to scale up our application to 36 nodes as the volume of transactions increased over the years.
  • Helped us achieve 99.999 availability for our users.
Read full review
  • It's helped to create a community of loyal users, which would be difficult with other applications
  • The implementation was fast
  • It's easy to update
Read full review
ScreenShots