ORNA vs. Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

ORNA

Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
ORNA	Score 0.0 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	ORNA is an AI-guided Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) and cyber risk management platform created and priced specifically for smaller teams, be it SOC, CSIRT, CERT, or even your entire organization, from IT and Compliance to HR and Legal. ORNA features an AI-powered adaptive playbook engine called Theia. Theia collates data across 28 global sources, including the Dark Web, parses it using Natural Language Processing and uses Machine Learning algorithms to enrich…	$0 per month
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull (TRAP) enables messaging and security administrators to automatically retract threats delivered to employee inboxes and emails that turn malicious after delivery to quarantine. It is also a powerful solution to retract messages sent in error as well as inappropriate, malicious, or emails containing compliance violations and also follows forwarded mail and distribution lists and creates an audit-able activity trail. With Proofpoint Threat Response…	N/A

Pricing

ORNA

Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

Editions & Modules

Freemium: $0
per month
Basic: $833
per month
Advanced: $1,133
per month
Advanced: $1,133
per month
Managed ORNA: $6,600
per month
Managed ORNA: $6,600
per month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
ORNA	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Special discounted pricing for healthcare, non-profit and education organizations.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	ORNA	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Considered Both Products	ORNA No answer on this topic	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Chose Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull TRAP had fewer false positives and caught more malicious emails. With the host of companion products, it was more complete package. It gives us the ability to pull emails using an admin-submitted CVS file of emails to pull. EOP does not have this capability. Incentivized Helpful? Fraser Clark Network Engineer Chose Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull I have not evaluated any other products against TRAP. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull I have never evaluated TRAP against another product. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

ORNA

Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

Incident Response Platforms

Comparison of Incident Response Platforms features of Product A and Product B
	ORNA - Ratings	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull 8.4 Ratings 4% below category average
Integration with Other Security Systems	00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Attack Chain Visualization	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Centralized Dashboard	00 Ratings	6.00 Ratings
Machine Learning to Prevent Incidents	00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Live Response for Rapid Remediation	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	ORNA	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Small Businesses	ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes Score 8.8 out of 10	ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	ORNA	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	ORNA	Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	It is very well suited for any organization, though the pricing is more for larger organizations. Having auto pull available means you have fewer worries that phishing emails end up in users' mailboxes. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Finds malicious messages in users mailboxes that were not previously detected. Gives good data about messages post-detection. Integrates with AD. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Would like an Azure virtual machine version of it. Currently, it's only supported on VMware and AWS. Configuring authentication certificates on it is not easy. It does not work with RSASSA-PSS signed certificates. Incentivized Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	It's easy to use and requires very little administrator hands on. Incentivized Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	They are quick to respond and have talented support personnel. Incentivized Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	TRAP had fewer false positives and caught more malicious emails. With the host of companion products, it was more complete package. It gives us the ability to pull emails using an admin-submitted CVS file of emails to pull. EOP does not have this capability. Incentivized Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Helped mitigate the email portion of our penetration test entirely. Made us aware of the amount of suspicious emails being delivered. Prevented malware spreading through mail. Incentivized Fraser Clark Network Engineer Read full review
ScreenShots	ORNA Screenshots