TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Paligo

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/APaligo, headquartered in Stockholm, offers their component content management system (CCMS), supporting the creation and publishing of technical documentation and help systems.

    $4,800

    per year per seat

    Pricing
    Paligo
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    from $4800
    per year
    Business
    Contact Sales
    per year
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Paligo
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Yes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptional
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Paligo
    Considered Both Products
    Paligo
    Chose Paligo
    I was working with 10+ CMS:es (list here is not possible choose them from) “all my active work life” and Paligo GUI is unique: No or very few systems of this complexity have a rational GUI. Paligo stands out here and is very user friendly! When it comes to style sheets and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    Simpler, more aesthetic and clean, easier to use, inherent design that molds the user based on section limitations, etc.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    • Web server is under our control
    • Content editable via dashboard and also APi
    • Full support of DocBook
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    All the positives described in previous answers
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    Paligo is way easier to use than Flare.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    We looked at two others. Paligo was the only one that was cloud-based and intuitive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    Paligo is better than both, by far. Confluence is only as good as its third-party addons and Robohelp isn't worth talking about.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    Paligo gives you the benefits of a fully integrated XML content database, making the whole package much easier to setup and use than a system using Oxygen. It's much easier to set up and far less expensive than Adobe's XML offerings. The cost is comparable to MadCap, but all …
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    I was not part of the selection process / did not evaluate other tools. I had previously been authoring my content in Google Suite or directly in our Learning Management System. Both of those were hells of information duplication.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    No other
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    We were using our own, custom management scheme - relying on tools like SharePoint to store and collaboratively edit.
    But we were lacking the reusability feature and content control features that Paligo provides.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    Paligo is a different league. Cloud based for easy access and collaboration from anywhere. Great taxonomy and HTML5 features.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    Compared to Author-It, Paligo is a godsend. It's so much more performant, the output quality is much higher, and the user experience is unmatched.
    Before we switched to Paligo, I had to spend multiple working days just fixing the broken output that Author-It has given me, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    We moved from Flare to Paligo. One of the main reasons was the fact that Paligo is a cloud product. Collaboration with anyone outside of our team was more difficult with Flare. Also, maintaining a server for Flare content was going to become an issue, and overall I felt the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    They are both good documentation options, but the cloud-native capabilities and intuitive UI of Paligo, plus it's ability to produce excellent output for both PDF and HTML5 were the main reasons I chose Paligo. I am very satisfied with my choice.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    Affordable and easy to use. Several different tasks can be handled in the same tool - not just for editing.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    We selected Paligo over the alternatives for a variety of reasons:
    It was cloud-based (usable on a Mac)
    It had the features we needed: Content reuse Variables Easy restructuring and maneuverability of content
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    Intuitive cloud-native tool based on XML that does true single-sourcing - not one of these other competitors has this unique combination.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    Better Support than any of the others; Ability to migrate at cost (unlike AIT and Flare); Teamwork and centralized variables (unlike Word, Google Docs, FM); Diff and Revert (must-have feature); L10N features (better than all others).
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    Paligo is the only structured authoring tool that natively publishes to Zendesk. My team is forced to publish to Zendesk, so this was easy.
    Incentivized
    Chose Paligo
    I trialed a version of Oxygen XML editor, but the fact that Paligo is cloud-based and integrates directly to Zendesk sold me, even though Oxygen XML is essentially the de facto standard for most structured authoring.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Paligo
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.4
    (31 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    8.2
    (24 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.9
    (26 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (1 ratings)