PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs.
$35
per month per seat
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
QuoteWerks is specialized Configuration Pricing Quoting (CPQ) software that can be used in every industry to create sales quotes and proposals. The vendor’s value proposition is that rather than relying on Microsoft Word or Excel to create quotes, users can benefit from a tool that is specialized for the task of creating quotes and proposals.
QuoteWerks integrates with the user's existing CRM software and distributors. With QuoteWerks users can also submit orders…
$15
per user/per month
Pricing
PandaDoc
QuoteWerks
Editions & Modules
Starter
$35
per month per seat
Business
$65
per month per seat
Enterprise
Contact Sales
QuoteWerks Standard Edition
$15
per user/per month
QuoteWerks Professional Edition
$20
per user/per month
QuoteWerks Corporate Edition
$29
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PandaDoc
QuoteWerks
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing.
The QuoteWerks license count is based on concurrent usage so while you may have 5 users using it, you may only need to purchase 2 licenses. The QuoteValet license count is based on daily maximum number of unique users.
In addition to monthly and annual subscriptions, one-time, up-front purchasing options for edition and realtime licenses are available which include volume pricing discounts. Invest up-front and pay minor maintenance fees annually. Please contact QuoteWerks Sales at sales@quotewerks.com or 407-248-1481 to answer any questions or to obtain a personalized quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PandaDoc
QuoteWerks
Considered Both Products
PandaDoc
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PandaDoc
I find it easier to automate and create templates in PandaDoc. Specifically the templates. Also, connecting through API is easier (our IT team says so, I'm not qualified to evaluate that). Pricing is also something important, when we acquired PandaDoc it was cheaper so we were …
PandaDoc is equal to DocuSign in every significant way except for its level of adoption; however, the pricing of PandaDoc is so much better that it's clearly the best choice for our firm.
We used Dropbox back when it was still HelloSign. At the time, new templates were very hard to create. We had to upload a PDF and then add the fields from there. With PandaDoc, we are able to drag and drop the text, images, logos, and fields we need easily. This has saved our …
PandaDoc and DocuSign are very similar in functionality and design, but I prefer to use PandaDoc's interface. It is so easy to use and I prefer PandaDoc's interface and UI. It feels a little cleaner and a little more professional to me when compared with DocuSign's interface …
To be able to block certain fields within templates and contracts, so that the commercial team can negotiate the rest and adapt them but cannot change those purely legal clauses that should not be negotiated or changed without the approval of the legal department. I also find …
We briefly used Proposify, and it had some nice options for creating more ascetically pleasing proposals and contracts. However, it was far more time-consuming, and any gain in asceticism did not outweigh the significant loss in efficiency, simplicity, and reliability of using …
Conga was difficult to build template contracts and not as simple to set up templates, etc., for our sales contracts as Pandadoc has been (simple drag-and-drop in Pandadoc). The automation and integration between our Salesforce and Conga accounts were not working correctly, so …
We chose PandaDoc for its ease of use and tools that allow a professional feel. The convenience for our clients to review and sign agreements also helped us make the decision to go with PandaDoc.
We looked at DocuSign before PandaDocs, and while they are a well-known and good product, we felt their basic content was lacking compared to PandaDoc. We felt we got more bang for our buck, and the navigation seemed better. Plus, we get a dedicated rep with PandaDoc.
We still use Quickbooks for invoicing but are looking into other products that integrate with PD better than Quickbooks. That way we can quote and invoice from PD.
We used to use QwikQuote back in the late 90's and early 2000's. While it was pretty easy to use, it didn't have all the bells and whistles that QuoteWerks has to offer. I don't remember why we stopped using it, but we ended up writing our own quoting software.
We used Excel for quoting before finding QuoteWerks. Excel was time-consuming and errors occurred often with bad or broken formulas and then we still had to manually transfer the quote. QuoteWerks has made quoting quick and easy. It has also made converting quotes to orders in …
QuoteWerks just seems to make more sense for this application than the others. They are great CRM's but they can be quite limited in functionality when it comes to actual quotes, breakdowns, and totals. They leave you pretty much doing it manually, and because of that, …
Zomentum is slightly more "friendly" looking but, not as widely used by industries, therefore not as useful. QuoteWerks has more hard features and many that I don't use but would be useful to bigger or more hard users. QuoteWerks could do with a light version for simplified …
The major reason to go with the QuoteWerks was due to pricing as compared to its competitors which involves the production of the sales made easy as well as easy to use in order to work on the production and cloud migration made easy in order to go with it and resolve the …
Both this software were similar in what they do and pricing, however, the QuoteWork software in my opinion does a better job recording and tracking communications between personnel and clients. QuoteWerks also gives a lot of data that might seem like overkill, but having too …
While I was not a part of the decision-making in either of these tools, I believe QuoteWerks gave us the ability to work with a broader audience than BlueSnap.
QuoteWerks is extremely robust. Its CPQ is what attracted me to it, especially since it can read MS Access and MS SQL Server databases. We connected it with Infinity so we could quote our inventory in real-time.
We have used several other quoting methods and none are as efficient. The fact that the software is installed locally and not a cloud only product makes quote entry much faster.
Our primary alternative was to create our own quoting database using Microsoft Access. QuoteWerks is basically an better version of what we could have built.
I have been working with QuoteWerks so long the last things I used were Word and Excel for making quotes for customers and this is hands down better than either of those.
At the time that we selected QuoteWerks there was not quoting software "married" to ConnectWise. We viewed both products and since the products were very similar we chose the product that more closely fit our budget. QuoteWerks fit the bill.
Both software options have different strengths. I prefer QuoteWerks for how easy it is to customize a quote and add in appropriate discounts, as well as having multiple quotes per account. I prefer Drawloop because it's embedded into Salesforce. Drawloop takes much longer to …
The price point and licensing model was better than Quosal. That was one of the main deciding factors because based on the demos/webinars many of the features were the same.
I used Netsuite a number if years ago and it was nowhere near as good. It was slow, cumbersome, and if your Internet connection burped for a moment you lost everything - no sessions persistence + no autosave was not a good combination. There was also no usable import tool. …
QuoteWerks is a lot less expensive and easy to customize. We chose QuoteWerks based on price and reviews. We also chose QuoteWerks based on the customer service of the sales associate. You seem to get lost in the system with CNET.
We elected to go with QuoteWerks due to it's lower total cost. ConnectWise sell would have been markedly more costly for us to allow our entire team to use it when it is uncommon for more than one of us to be using it at a time.
QuoteWerks maybe a little less user-friendly than ConnectWise Sell, however, the price is much less and we felt we didn't need anything different. One of the features in Connectwise Sell was that you could send to a customer for auto approval, but we rarely need to do that for …
Quotewerks is like its name, it's really good at making quotes and making sure you are quoting competitively sourced IT goods. The other things like full CRM, full PSA, full accounting, will require you to buy something else in addition. so you get this functionality. It's also …
We have reviewed Quosal (ConnectWise Sell). The quoting process is better on looking pretty, but it has a multitude of flaws that done help with accomplishing what actually needs to happen. QuoteWerks accomplishes anything that we need it to do, and if it's short on those …
As an alternative to other electronic signature mechanisms, I can't recommend PandaDoc more highly. It works, plain and simple. It is less costly - by a lot - than most alternatives, stores signed documents online for easy access, is simple to use by both our staff and our clients, and makes our lives far easier.
The sales department is satisfied with QuoteWerks and this generates satisfaction throughout the company. The main recommendation is to use the free trial first in order to know what the goals of each company are according to their size and futuristic vision. QuoteWerks opening easy and robust integration with our CRMs, this also improves workflow. It works as an electronic signature that has improved working time and in general the relationship with our clients because we no longer have to ask the client to print the document and then sign it.
The data structure that is required to set up the "price books" behind the scenes is a little cumbersome until you learn how to do it and practice.
The sync function for the data is sometimes a little slow in the Standard and Professional editions because of the Access back-end. The Corporate edition uses a MS SQL back-end and is better.
We have been using it for a few years now and find it vital to getting our bids out quickly and accurately to our customers. We can get a request for information from a customer and once we have their basic parameters create a professional bid in minutes. It's actually usually harder to find out what the customer wants than to use PandaDoc and create a document with it
We will renew because QuoteWerks has all the capabilities we require for our business processes and our reps like it. The support is top notch and the pricing model saves us considerable money over SaaS models. I also feel confident that Aspire Technologies will continue to improve and add features
Once you get the hang of it, it's very easy to use. There can be a slightly steep learning curve to get fully in on the system. The new editor v2 has really improved usability and allows us to collaborate on documents simultaneously. Once the templates and library items are set up, a new document, whether it be a sales or HR document, takes very little time to complete.
Our company's experience with Quotewerks has been position and we have continued to look at other solutions to make sure we are not missing something, however for the pricing structure for what we use, makes it the right solution for our business.
QuoteWerks is a very stable, robust solution. In my experience: bugs in the software are rare; any crashes or system failures are usually due to other infrastructure issues rather than the software itself, i.e. a problem with the network or server, an issue with a.n.other piece of software on the User's workstation that has a knock-on effect on QuoteWerks.
As I mentioned earlier - performance is near perfect as I can create, send, adjust my documents. I love the tracking feature as well as I can tell when my documents have been seen and by whom. The only issue I have run into is with saving and formatting - occasionally the file document does not save with the newly assigned name or the content of the document does not stay formatted nicely.
Once set up and running, and particularly when running the more reliable, faster Corporate edition rehosted to SQL Server, then QuoteWerks performs very well. The only reason for the slight mark down here is that QuoteWerks is very sensetive to having a database connection. If there is an issue whereby the connection to the server is lost (network glitch for example) then whereas Outlook (or a.n.other piece of software) might just wait and poll in 30 seconds time, QuoteWerks will crash and potentially a User lose all changes to the document(s) that they were working on.
Recently I could not upload a pdf to a contract - support was very responsive and easy to work with. They got back to me the next day with an apparent fix - however when I opened the document nothing had changed. I then could not respond to the rep who was helping me because it was a "no-reply address", the problem still has not been solved and we had to make alternate arrangements to get this to the client. Never had it happen before and was only with this one contract.
Quotewerks Support and the UK Distributor here have always been responsive to our requests and in particular helped us out when we need some new functionality which then got added in the next build...this really impressed me and showed that where case was made, they readily embraced it and the new build was completed within 60 days.
I do not have any key insights on the implementation so I cannot provide any valuable information here. I do know, however, that the process went well when we switched from a old platform to a new hyperconverged solution to host Quotewerks. It seemed to be a quick process and our engineer was able to do so almost seamlessly.
PandaDoc is a more polished, professional, and 'legitimate' software site than other solutions, since PandaDoc really specializes in creating professional proposals, quotes and invoices. The eSignature capacity and pricing table capacity embedded in the documents as well as fillable fields, pre-made, customizable and reusable templates also make PandaDoc stand out.
Both this software were similar in what they do and pricing, however, the QuoteWork software in my opinion does a better job recording and tracking communications between personnel and clients. QuoteWerks also gives a lot of data that might seem like overkill, but having too much information is better than too little.
We've implemented QuoteWerks in both micro ("one man band") businesses as well as much larger organisations. With QuoteWerks Corporate editions option to host the backend database on SQL Server (a very powerful and scaleable database platform) it's possible to work effectively with QuoteWerks in an organisation with many 100 Users. The flexibility of the product also lends itself very well to evolving with a growing business and having various individual user configurations to help them work best with the software in their individual role in the organisation.