Paycor provides core HR functions scaled towards small and mid-sized businesses. Paycor offers an integrated benefits platform for interfacing directly with insurance carriers and an adaptable time management platform.
N/A
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
The PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform is a talent management platform designed for Higher Education and Government organizations, now from PowerSchool (acquired August, 2018). Modules include analytics, applicant tracking, position management, onboarding, records management, and performance management.
N/A
Pricing
Paycor
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Paycor
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Paycor's pricing for small, mid, and enterprise companies varies based on product bundle and company size. Because Paycor HR software is built to help businesses scale and grow, plans are based on the mix of HR products needed, and company size. Payroll is at the core of Paycor's offering, and their products are sold as a part of their payroll and HR platform.
I've used quite a few other pay apps through different companies I've worked with over the years. Truthfully, I don't feel like Payor is any better or worse than the rest of them.
Paycom is terrible or at least it was 5 plus years ago. The in The interface is terrible, there was no mobile app.. it was not a great solution solution and did not have good integrations. Over all the product was terrible for admins and employees In times of critical need …
You have way better control when running payroll. Also way easier to adjust individual employees paycheck. Peoplesoft benefits was difficult so we didn’t use it to enroll employees into health insurance . We used excel spreadsheets to calculate.
Paycor is much easier to set up and make changes on the go as the organization evolves. Paycor has a more pleasing interface for managers, software andmin, and employee experience. Reporting is probably more customizable with ADP and they seem to have better and more usable …
I was a big ADP fan and rolled out the system at my previous two jobs. Once I got to my new company I realized how and simple and awesome Paycor is. I would not switch to another company.
Paycor is better than Paylocity because at least with Paycor we get responses to our questions and concerns. We do have the best customer success rep and technical account manager who have done wonders for our experience and our account. There is SO much potential with Paycor, …
I prefer Quickbooks, it was the easiest system to process, approve, pay, and log. Taxes were easier however it was the most expensive and we were all told that the changes were being made.
Paycor seemed simpler and still allowed the employer to control many aspects of what the employeea can do. The cost was more effective than Paycom. The customer service was another area of concern, even though Paycor could improve on some reps speaking better English, this is …
Bamboo's interface and customer service is better than Paycor's. The main reason we have not switched is because of up-front implementation fees that come with every platform. If I had a blank slate, I am honestly not sure I would choose Paycor, but I don't mind having Paycor …
Paycom has all one system, so their different modules all talk to one another. They also have an excellent benefit module and EDI feed setup. We have had no problems with their benefit setup or EDI feeds; they work well!
Overall, I prefer it to the bigger HRIS systems that I work with (ADP, Paycom, Paylocity) and would chose Paycor above those listed. I do prefer utilizing other Ben Admin Systems (Gusto, Rippling, Ease) for pulling general reports, usability, and customer service needs for …
Sales rep were really respectful. I felt with some other vendors they were a bit aggressive. The demo that was made in house was nice and the guy demonstrating it knew a lot about the system which made us more confident in the decision. Also, the ability of having all in one …
Assistant Director of Technology & Compensation Specialist
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
PeopleAdmin 5.8 - this applicant tracking system was efficient; however, the SelectSuite system is much more robust and a better fit for faculty recruitment.
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
I've used both Target Recruit and HR Smart. When working with Target Recruit it quickly became apparent it was not the right solution for us. Another solution we examined prior to selection PeopleAdmin was iCIMS. iCIMS is a very social system but was not as familiar with the …
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
I have used SAP's e-recruit, ADP and Brass Ring.
PeopleAdmin is more user friendly than SAP and ADP.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
There are a number of comparable products in the marketplace. Our primary reason for choosing PeopleAdmin 7.6 was that we were an existing PeopleAdmin 5.8 customer.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
I did not have a choice in which program I used. I learned PeopleAdmin fairly quickly and use it everyday. I can't compare other products to PeopleAdmin, but I can say that I don't feel the need to find other products. I am satisfied with the overall quality of PeopleAdmin even …
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
I had no choice in the selection of the product. I have never used another recruiting software from an employer standpoint, only as an applicant and this one works well from the perspective of someone applying for a job. From a SuperUser standpoint I think the product could use …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Currently, we are satisfied with PeopleAdmin and our managers are knowledgeable on the program. PeopleAdmin seems to be better with handling the specific issues with confidentiality used in our faculty searches.
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
PeopleAdmin is the only web based recruiting system I have used. We previously used the version 5.8 system and now we use version 7 is an improvement overall.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
We selected PeopleAdmin because of the cost. If cost were not an issue, we would have probably gone with another product. The customer service support from our implementation team and post implementation was very strong.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
PeopleAdmin was the Applicant Tool in place when I started, would I use again? Yes. Would I refer it? Yes. Many tools out there who do the job to track applicants but not all are as easy to use as PeopleAdmin's recruiting tool, for myself and Executives.
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
HRIS
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
I came in after implementation at East Carolina University. A good reason to select them would be their experience in higher education. The applicant tracking module is quite good. Nowadays, other products might give you better reporting and ERP integration.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
We have recently began to look at other services such as Oracle Taleo and SuccessFactors. In my opinion, these companies, operating in the cloud, offer many more features that service the employee through their entire life cycle. I specifically like their infinite reporting …
Features
Paycor
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Paycor
7.8
Ratings
5% below category average
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Paycor
-
Ratings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.7
Ratings
5% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Paycor
-
Ratings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
5.8
Ratings
20% below category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Paycor
-
Ratings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
2.7
Ratings
84% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
1.00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
1.00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Paycor
-
Ratings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
Ratings
6% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
In my experience, Paycor is well suited for organizations such as my own where the hiring process and fairly straightforward. A company that values ease of use, consistency, and organization will have great results with Paycor Recruiting. The system is also especially helpful when a company like mine must frequently recruit for the same exact role over and over again. That is where the customizable templates really come into play! On the other hand, a company that has a more specialized or complex recruiting process may struggle with using the platform. If more advanced integrations or data analytics are required then they would likely need a platform that is more robust in those areas.
PeopleAdmin handles the process of recruiting very well. It integrated into the jobbing.com web pages as well as other job websites. The learning curve for users is not too steep. The web page format is intuitive to users. The user interface looks good. The initial issue would be the number of candidates the organization handles per year. Due to our business, we handle a large number of candidates, but US and international. PeopleAdmin facilitates this process.
Applicant tracking was a good use of this tool for our department. I think it could use a few more customization features but overall it was a good tool to weed out applicants who were not qualified for the position.
The system has some canned reporting tools that also worked well for our department and management needs.
It was a great place to house our position descriptions and provided a readily accessible source for hiring managers to make requested updates and changes and for employees to see and have access to their position descriptions.
Administrative/C-Suite level of canned reports and dashboards
Displaying company reminders or documents to sign that are urgent in a way that doesn’t allow an employee to clock out until they have completed the task.
Moving applicants through workflow is not a very fluid process. When the number of applicants spans multiple pages one is forced to work with each page individually; moving applicants to a status that requires approval precludes moving any others in workflow without filtering them out but it is not obvious that one needs to be aware of this.
One can't search for a job description by simply typing in the employee's name - it requires using the position number and often the name is what is at hand.
When one changes positions within the organization and requires different access there does not seem to be a way to be added globally to job descriptions in the new unit - the process is far too manual. Although I believe adding new units to ones profile is fairly simple, apparently one can't remove the old units so I continue to see things that I no longer need to.
The product is really good overall. The customer service is not the best and the benefits administration is kind of painful. However, the good outweighs the bad. We might get a different benefit admin system that can be integrated into Paycor. My controller doesn't want to switch anything for a [long] time.
We are evaluating our options as it relates to PeopleAdmin. We are likely to renew as we can not find another product that gives us the functionality we have with PeopleAdmin 5.8 in the area of Position Description. Outside of that, we would likely be close to finding another product solution.
The performance management module was so inaccessible it was impossible to implement alone. They must have received this feedback a lot as then they started offering implementation specialists ($5,000!) that actually got us up and running. Before that I could not access the module. Other areas are relatively easy to learn via their support articles and videos
I feel like Paycor is always up and running! If they are planning downtime, they communicate it clearly. Every once in a while, I get something that says the system isn't working but it is usually back up within the hour. I typically find by the time that the employees complain about it, that it is resolved within the system.
For the most part, everything moves super fast. There are a few sections (Expense Management) that sometimes take a bit to load correctly. Or if they are interesting, it takes a minute to talk to each other! But reports are quickly downloaded and available! Even data heavy reports run fairly fast!
I feel like support will transfer you back and forth between departments and put you on hold forever. I believe it is very difficult to see the status of an open ticket. During my experience, it feels like the client has to push all communication and request updates from support regularly.
The online trainings are super helpful. They have user guides that you can read through, interactive training that will walk you through it as well as plain web based ones. I've actually never had an in-person training but all of the information you need can be found online. They also will do individual support training if you are struggling with a certain area.
I've been through a payroll software implementation multiple times in my career, ranging from upgrades to an existing platform to complete replacement of providers. This implementation was the easiest from the standpoint of confidence in my implementation personnel. The implementation consultants at Paycor were AMAZINGLY knowledgeable about the software and offered us advice at every step of the way. We never had any concerns that they didn't know what we wanted or needed.
Overall, Paycor is a solid system that meets most of our needs. It offers a wide range of functionality and generally performs well. However, there are a few technical issues that create challenges, particularly within the onboarding module. From the few systems we have used, Paycor has the most potential
I've used both Target Recruit and HR Smart. When working with Target Recruit it quickly became apparent it was not the right solution for us. Another solution we examined prior to selection PeopleAdmin was iCIMS. iCIMS is a very social system but was not as familiar with the Higher Education recruitment processes as was PeopleAdmin.
I gave it a 10 because we only use it across one organization. However, it has allowed us to break it into multiple departments and layers of management. It is also easy for us to utilize across different locations but still under one master company. They have always provided us support when we decide to change something on an organizational level
We can process Payroll in a 25% of the time that we previously could.
Scheduling takes 2 or 3 times as much effort as it did before.
Onboarding allows employees to do self-service but comes with a lot of questions from team members so it is net the same amount of time at the end of the day.