Invited by the Vendor
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wondershare PDFelement | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | PDFelement is a document management solution from Wondershare Software headquartered in China. | $79.99 per year per user |
| Wondershare PDFelement | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | For Individuals: Yearly Plan: $79.99/user; 2-Year Plan: $109.99/user Perpetual Plan(one-time): $129.99/user For Teams: Yearly plan starts at $109/year for 1 user For Education: Yearly Plan: $47.99/user; Perpetual Plan(one-time): $99.99/user | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Wondershare PDFelement | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Verified User Chose Wondershare PDFelement PDFelement is more intuitive, and snapper, with more wow factors. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Accountant at Private (Accounting, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement PDFelement is the ideal solution for Adobe Acrobat because of its small size, clean interface, quick start, strong features, light system resource usage, and low pricing. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Contract Manager at Private (Writing & Editing, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement They are doing quite aggressive marketing, therefore it is very present everywhere. Pricing is in the range for private users. If features are improved, I probably would buy it again, otherwise think next time would try the competition (e.g., Nitro). Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Strategic Manager in Research & Development at Media 360 (Marketing & Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement Adobe Acrobat. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Hydropower Expert in Engineering at Self Employed Consultant (Civil Engineering, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement I used Adobe Acrobat for around 15 years in different large scale companies. But it is too expensive for single users or small enterprises and Adobe offers only yearly subscription which I personally do not like. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Wondershare PDFelement Both of the programs mentioned above have worked much better for my needs. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() RPA Senior consultant in Research & Development at Emids technology (Hospital & Health Care, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement We selected PDFelement because it did the job well and at the lowest cost of our options. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Director of Instruction in Professional Services at Austin Learning Center (Education Management, 51-200 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement I haven't evaluated any other products. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Vice President Of Marketing And Business Development in Marketing at ACCENT Ventures (Management Consulting, 11-50 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement I don't even remember the name of the products I tried, but none of them worked right. PDFelement does the job and does it well. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Wondershare PDFelement We haven't used any other similar products, and don't feel any desire to stop using PDFelement. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() General Manager in Finance and Accounting at Plantax Pacific Financial Inc. (Financial Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement The experience is different. From a cost perspective, PDFelement is more cost effective and can get things done. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Quality Manager in Quality Assurance (Defense & Space, 51-200 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement Adobe PDF is the alternative for me but much more expensive. It has more features but I don’t need them. For a small business PDFelement's affordability makes it a cost effective option. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Author at Grace Baptist Church, Woodhaven, NY (Writing and Editing, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement I didn't try or buy other programs, but did a good bit of research on them. I went with PDFelement because of the lower pricing, and because of the rich features I learned it had. I also appreciated the great customer service I received from reps in the community forums, which … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Owner in Engineering at Dave Robinson Consulting (Design, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement No other products outside Adobe. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Business Owner in Professional Services at Stuart McLellan Master Photographer (Events Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement I have evaluated Acrobat but found it less user friendly than PDFelement and very expensive on a product to product comparison Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Diretor in Corporate at Microlins (Consumer Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement PDFelement has among the several options available in the market, a productivity solution with relevant acquisition costs associated with the benefits offered. Among the functions available in the application, other companies have the same function with lower performance and … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Wondershare PDFelement The quality of the images was better (I need to print an A2 or A1 poster) Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() President of Sales in Sales at Premier Medical Equipment, LLC (Hospital & Health Care, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement I have not used anything else other than Adobe Acrobat and PDFelement meets all my needs and is easier to use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Verified User Chose Wondershare PDFelement Just as good, and just as clean; but easier to use. Just as many options and an easy to use format and layout. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Owner in Legal at Zurica Law (Law Practice, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement PDFelement is not only much much easier to use but it is less expensive. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Verified User Chose Wondershare PDFelement Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info ![]() Project Manager in Product Management at Signature Sounds Recordings, Inc. (Music, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement I haven't used any other product besides PDFelement. I found a product that I love and I'm sticking with it. I will say that I went with PDFelement based on reviews and based on the features that this product supplies vs. the others. I trust the company behind PDFelement (been … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Starting New Venture Stay Tune at COMING SOON! (Financial Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Wondershare PDFelement PDFelement is superior to PDFzilla and comparable in features to Adobe and a better price. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Wondershare PDFelement | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.1 (55 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Usability | 8.6 (5 ratings) |
| Availability | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Performance | 7.5 (2 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 8.4 (8 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Configurability | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | 7.5 (2 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | 10.0 (1 ratings) |