Acunetix by Invicti vs. Pentest-Tools.com

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Acunetix by Invicti
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
AcuSensor from Maltese company Acunetix is application security and testing software.
$4,500
Pentest-Tools.com
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Pentest-Tools.com helps security professionals find, validate, and communicate vulnerabilities, whether they’re internal teams defending at scale, MSPs juggling clients, or consultants under pressure. The service provides coverage across network, web, API, and cloud assets, and includes built-in exploit validation to turn every scan into credible, actionable insight. Boasting users among over 2,000 teams in 119 countries for use…
$95
per month 5 assets included
Pricing
Acunetix by InvictiPentest-Tools.com
Editions & Modules
Websites Scanned: 5
4,500
Websites Scanned: 6-10
7,200
Websites Scanned: 11-20
10,800
Websites Scanned: 21-35
22,540
Websites Scanned: 36-50
26,600
Websites Scanned: Over 50
Contact for quote
NetSec
$95
per month 5 assets included
WebNetSec
$140
per month 5 assets included
Pentest Suite
$190
per month 5 assets included
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Acunetix by InvictiPentest-Tools.com
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThere's a 15% annual subscription discount.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Acunetix by InvictiPentest-Tools.com
Considered Both Products
Acunetix by Invicti
Chose Acunetix by Invicti
In my opinion Acunetix fares good in DevSecOps pipeline better than Appspider. In terms of vulnerabilities scanning of dynamic applications I liked Rapid7, however we have better ROI with Acunetix. During 6 months of usage I tried to look into cost benefit analysis and could …
Chose Acunetix by Invicti
ZAP is a free tool, and adequate. But it is to that extent less friendly. I would not be as confident of the results and it definitely can't produce reports on par with Acunetix. There would be a lot of legwork on our end if we desired to switch to this tool.
Chose Acunetix by Invicti
Every year, we re-evaluate the tools we are using and licensing. We balance the ever-changing vendor licensing-models, costs, tool features/usability, etc. For the last few years, this has been the best overall commercial tool for our specific use case. However, this is only …
Pentest-Tools.com
Chose Pentest-Tools.com
Offers a great number of tools in one interface, giving you a single pane of glass to work from. Therefore, it's favourable compared to some of these other products, that do similar things but are less intuitive and less easy to use. This makes it not only easier to use, but …
Best Alternatives
Acunetix by InvictiPentest-Tools.com
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Acunetix by InvictiPentest-Tools.com
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Acunetix by InvictiPentest-Tools.com
Likelihood to Recommend
Acunetix scales well from a small web development presence like ours to a full-scale enterprise focused on that. The various tools and sensors that provide assurance of the results and can give feedback down to the lines of code in the source are proof of this. Various integrations exist as well. The main thing for us is that it simplifies confirming and remediating potential issues in our code or proving that products we use have issues that we can then take to the vendor for correction.
Read full review
This website is well suited for organisations that perform regular security assessments. In particular, external scans and reconnaissance. As an example, I am able to run a report on our Wordpress website to enable me to see whether we are missing any important security updates. We found it to be very useful for training new security analysts, due to the straightforward GUI. You can work on the same projects together to help you to do this. Having it laid out in front of them helps them to understand the concepts much easier than using dozens of different tools to achieve the same goals, and also speeds up training. If you're a personal user it may not be appropriate due to price. If you are a personal user, I would advise using the many open source tools there are that do the same things. The strength of this platform is that it combines them into a single pane of glass, but you can achieve the same things with other tools if necessary. For example, there are many other tools that you could use to run a UDP port scan that do not cost money (EG NMAP)
Read full review
Pros
  • Integration of tool with different IDE is great
  • Easy to scan code and identify vulnerabilities
  • Dashboard is easy to customise
Read full review
  • Cheaper than some other platforms
  • Good support
  • Cloud based
  • Integrates well with identity providers
Read full review
Cons
  • Does not support multiple endpoints well (e.g. apps and services that do not reside at the same URL).
  • Has authentication problems with modern enterprise apps which involve a lot of redirects to unrelated endpoints, federated IDs, SSO, etc. This is related to the first point.
  • The vulnerability detection capability is not as robust as Burp Suite Pro + extensions, Metasploit + auxiliary modules, Nmap + scripts, etc.
Read full review
  • No logging for things like scanning. This means you don't actually know when the scan has failed if you're not immediately on the ball.
  • Reports could look better. It would be good to be able to customise the report with some different styles to suit your company's branding.
  • Could have better tutorials.
  • It may be useful to have a feature similar to Microsoft Secure Score, which compares your organisation to similar ones, so that you have a reference of how secure your environment actually is.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
In my opinion Acunetix fares good in DevSecOps pipeline better than Appspider. In terms of vulnerabilities scanning of dynamic applications I liked Rapid7, however we have better ROI with Acunetix. During 6 months of usage I tried to look into cost benefit analysis and could easily pick Acunetix and in terms of dashboards also I am impressed
Read full review
Offers a great number of tools in one interface, giving you a single pane of glass to work from. Therefore, it's favourable compared to some of these other products, that do similar things but are less intuitive and less easy to use. This makes it not only easier to use, but easier to report results to your customers. Also, although the price point can seem high, once you start adding multiple paid tools that do the same job, there probably isn't a massive amount of difference (if any)
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Saved money compared to other commercial scanners, especially over the long run.
  • Scan speed seems to be pretty good compared to some of the bulkier commercial products out there. However, that largely has to do with proper configuration.
  • A downside is that is requires a bit of extra work just to get it set up to scan APIs, web services, etc.
Read full review
  • Price point allows us to sell the solution at an excellent margin
  • Freed up time due to the automated solutions, allowing us to utilise staff better
  • Use from anywhere due to being cloud based
Read full review
ScreenShots

Acunetix by Invicti Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardScreenshot of FilteringScreenshot of scan results

Pentest-Tools.com Screenshots

Screenshot of the Pentest-Tools.com dashboardScreenshot of the Website Vulnerability Scanner results pageScreenshot of pentest robotsScreenshot of scan results for Sniper: Auto-ExploiterScreenshot of some of the available integrationsScreenshot of an attack surface view