Pablo Mojica
Systems Administrator
Chose pfSense
PFSense is not a fully featured and supported enterprise-grade solution; however, it does offer a lot of similar functionality at a fraction of the cost for more minor requirements.
pfSense vs. Surfshark
pfSense vs. Surfshark
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 pfSense | N/A | pfSense is a firewall and load management product available through the open source pfSense Community Edition, as well as a the licensed edition, pfSense Plus (formerly known as pfSense Enterprise). The solution provides combined firewall, VPN, and router functionality, and can be deployed through the cloud (AWS or Azure), or on-premises with a Netgate appliance. It as scalable capacities, with functionality for SMBs. As a firewall, pfSense offers Stateful packet inspection, concurrent… | $179 per appliance | |
 Surfshark | N/A | N/A | $1.99 per month |
| pfSense | Surfshark | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| pfSense | Surfshark | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products |  pfSense  Mario Matinelli Director Chose pfSense Overall, pfSense is the most complete solution in terms of features included even though it currently lack of a centralised management interface.The Ubiquiti firewall offering is often appealing being well integrated within the Ubiquiti dashboard and it is often a solution of …  Pretty Varughese IT Executive Chose pfSense We were using Sophos XG Firewall in our environment before but we need a product that is customizable & provides low cost high security features. pfSense provided us high security features with customizable options as it's kernel is based on freeBSD.  Chirag Deol Chief Marketing Officer Chose pfSense We were using Sophos XG firewall in our environment but when it comes to cost it's more expensive with limited features. After using [pfSense] we are getting more security features at less cost. After pfSense provides a bundle of security features such as anti-spamming, …  James Freeman IT Consultant Chose pfSense pfSense is just a more flexible, lower-cost solution—it can be installed (if you wish) on just about any x86 hardware or even virtual machines - the community edition is free and so enables rapid prototyping and low-cost prototyping and lab build out—something that isn't …  Christian Shaheen Owner Chose pfSense pfSense itself is free and can be installed on just about any hardware so from a hardware cost perspective it can beat out anybody. In terms of features it's above many pro-sumer/small business solutions like Ubiquiti. It can't really stand against high-end gear like Cisco but …  Allan Leung IT & T Manager Chose pfSense First of all, I don't need to be a Cisco professional to manage VPN, load balance, multiple WAN/LAN, Firewall and etc. pfSense has an easy-to-use web interface and I can do everything and add packaged add-on services. Moreover, for Small & Medium Enterprise, IT budget is …  Jay Moore CIO Chose pfSense I have not seen a single thing that these other products do that pfSense does not. In fact, the performance/throughput of pfSense is better in my opinion.  Aaron Smith Information Technology Manager Chose pfSense While you can get the performance out of other products, pfSense offers the unique ability to put other services on the same device. Products such as Untagle's NG Firewall and SonicWall's TZ series offer cost effective options for firewall and VPN services, having incoming load …  germary zambrano jefe del departamento de informatica Chose pfSense pfSense is a new and innovative platform that has learned from the errors of older systems, which helps it cover the needs that aren't covered by Smoothwall.  Jim Rubenstein Chief Technology Officer Chose pfSense Before pfSense we were using consumer and small business rated network appliances from Linksys, Cisco, Buffalo and Netgear. We were replacing them on average of every 6-12 months because they'd fail or would offer poor wifi availability. Switching to pfSense allowed us to use …  Victor Arana IT Manager Chose pfSense It's an open source solution can support from 50 to 700 user without sweating and with the half of the standard bundle investment that will take to deploy a Fortigate UTM, or a Cisco ASA, also a Sophos UTM that are quite remarkable units but to pFSense saves you money and will …  Paolo Daniele Senior Network Engineer Chose pfSense Real competition was between Pfsense and OpnSense that integrates first the bootstrap Twitter framework. But with OpSense there are configurations that create some problems with a specific client (we've experienced that by creating an IPSec tunnel both with OpSense and …  Rikia Kosaka Senior Systems Engineer Chose pfSense I've used a number of routers like Cisco, Sonicwall, Juniper, Home based routers, etc. pfSense is like most routers but with the benefit of load balancing and multi-wan. Well many support multi-wan but load balancing is usually a separate device like an BIGiP F5 or Cisco CSS.  Jim Nitterauer Senior Systems Administrator Chose pfSense Neither of the Cisco devices are designed to compete. pfSense does tons more.  Richard Kiernan CTO and co founder Chose pfSense pfSense was chosen due to its excellent community support and forums | Surfshark  Dan Hathaway Director Chose Surfshark Surfshark's VPN (Virtual Private Network) is simply better in every way than any of the competitors that we have used every time. This is the jewel in the crown of the product. With the tools such as the search function, site breach detection and other tools such as antivirus … |
| pfSense | Surfshark | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firewall |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Virtual Private Network |
|
| pfSense | Surfshark | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  Sophos UTM Score 8.1 out of 10 |  Norton 360 Score 7.0 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways Score 9.6 out of 10 | Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways Score 9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises |  Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series Score 10.0 out of 10 | Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways Score 9.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| pfSense | Surfshark | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.6 (0 ratings) | 8.0 (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (0 ratings) |
| Usability | 10.0 (0 ratings) | 8.0 (0 ratings) |
| pfSense | Surfshark | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
Dan Hathaway Director |
| Pros |
Allan Leung IT & T Manager |
Dan Hathaway Director |
| Cons |
Aaron Smith Information Technology Manager |
Dan Hathaway Director |
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
Dan Hathaway Director |
| Usability |
|
Dan Hathaway Director |
| Support Rating |
 Jerry Riggin President | No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
Pablo Mojica Systems Administrator |
Dan Hathaway Director |
| Return on Investment |
 Charles R. Coggins III Technical Support Specialist |
Dan Hathaway Director |
| ScreenShots |