TrustRadius

PingOne from Ping Identity vs. Visa Secure with EMV 3-D Secure

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PingOne from Ping Identity
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT environments, it can be…
$20,000
per year
Visa Secure
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Visa developed the original 3-D Secure protocol more than 15 years ago to protect eCommerce transactions by providing an additional layer of identity verification before authorization. 3-D Secure (3DS) enables the exchange of data between the merchant, card issuer and, when necessary, the consumer, to validate that the transaction is being initiated by the rightful owner of the account.N/A
Pricing
PingOne from Ping IdentityVisa Secure with EMV 3-D Secure
Editions & Modules
Essential
$20,000
per year
Plus
$40,000
per year
Premium
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PingOne from Ping IdentityVisa Secure
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PingOne from Ping IdentityVisa Secure with EMV 3-D Secure
Considered Both Products
PingOne from Ping Identity
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
This solution is selected before my time so, not much influence ,but product allow to customized and require decent ping skills to configure the solution. Okta and Other solutions are well suited in this category with some positive and some negative capabilities. it must say …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
We tested PingOne but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure).
We tested PingId as well but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure).
We [spent] some time on PingDataGovernance but so far we don't have any use case for this …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
All contenders were capable, but we had scale concerns with NetIQ's architecture. In the end, what set Ping apart from the others was their level of engagement in understanding our use cases up front during the RFP stage and how they were focused on what we needed more than …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
I found both platforms compelling from an ease of use and user experience perspective. The decider for me was cost driven as I had already used Ping to drive a self-service transformation in a prior organization, and I intended to do the same at this one. Okta had issues with …
RN
Ram Nair
Director
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
Two-way authentication and ease of use. I've used several applications that just email a link but never ask for a verification code. By entering the verification code you are sure that the site is safe, secured, and reliable. Using Ping, we can ensure no one other than you will …
Visa Secure

No answer on this topic

Features
PingOne from Ping IdentityVisa Secure with EMV 3-D Secure
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
PingOne from Ping Identity
6.5
Ratings
22% below category average
Visa Secure with EMV 3-D Secure
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning1.60 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation2.30 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management4.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PingOne from Ping IdentityVisa Secure with EMV 3-D Secure
Small Businesses
Dashlane Password Manager
Dashlane Password Manager
Score 8.9 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PingOne from Ping IdentityVisa Secure with EMV 3-D Secure
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PingOne from Ping IdentityVisa Secure with EMV 3-D Secure
Likelihood to Recommend
The products we're using work well and are reliable. We've had very few outages, and when we have, their support team has been highly responsive and addressed the issues quickly. They are very customer focused and have been great partners throughout the relationship. I'm looking to adopt more of their technologies over the coming year.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • PingFederate is feature-rich, and quickly updated with the latest standards and profiles. This gives us more tools to apply identity standards to modern business challenges.
  • PingFederate and PingCentral were also easy to deploy within docker containers and weave into an infra-as-code deployment, keeping operational overhead low.
  • PingID has an array of supported authenticators for nearly every use case, and early FIDO2 support has us looking into moving to passwordless much more quickly than I had anticipated.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • I believe it is very secure & not sure if it needs any improvement as such
  • Only suggestion would be it should not ask users to re-confirm if the session is still active
RN
Ram Nair
Director
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Easy to use; all UI's are user friendly and easy to learn.[The] possibility to use API is [a] big value as well. We really like integration with CyberArk; with it we can manage privileged accounts according to company standards without breaking any rules, and we can be 100% sure that only approved persons will have administrative access.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
For our enterprise, they've assigned a customer success manager to ensure our needs are being addressed, and that person is top notch in knowing our priorities, enhancement requests, and open cases. Every time we've needed to engage support for a problem or a how-to question, they've been highly responsive and followed up with us to ensure the case was completely resolved. Their support personnel are highly skilled and trained. This is a very customer-centric company.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We tested PingOne but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We tested PingId as well but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We [spent] some time on PingDataGovernance but so far we don't have any use case for this product. We started exploration for PingDataSync (to synchronize two different LDAP directories), [and] so far it looks promising.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • it is positive with saving the cost
  • some drawback with aging solution
  • directory is solid and provide lots of cost saving
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots