Piano Analytics, formerly AT Internet, provides digital analytics to help customers measure their audience, optimise their digital performance and create value. From data collection to exploration, activation, and the sharing of actionable insights, the Piano Analytics Suite is designed to provide reliable high-quality data to enhance decision-making company-wide. Adapted to e-commerce, media, finance/banking, and corporate websites & mobile apps, the vendor promises an easy-to-use solution…
$430
per server calls consumption
Piwik PRO
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Piwik PRO Analytics Suite is an advanced platform providing a suite of modules centered around analytics that connects with other parts of the client’s tech stack. Piwik PRO Analytics Suite unifies marketing insights, provides a comprehensive view of performance, and facilitates data-driven actions to achieve better results. It offers multiple flexible hosting options and ensures compliance with strict data protection laws, including the GDPR, CCPA, PIPEDA, and…
N/A
Pricing
Piano Analytics
Piwik PRO
Editions & Modules
Business
$430
per server calls consumption
Premium
Contact us
per server calls consumption
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Piano Analytics
Piwik PRO
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$430 per server calls consumption
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Piano Analytics
Piwik PRO
Considered Both Products
Piano Analytics
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Piano Analytics
Amplitude Analytics, Google Analytics, and Mixpanel [are] tools I use[d] at the company I worked for [before].
AT Internet is more comprehensive and provides a lot of filters in easy ways, especially for websites that has various subdomains and pages used for different purposes. Also, the trend analysis and the ability to create reports and design them the way we want is very, very …
I use AT Internet and Google Analytics together so I didn't have to choose between the two tools. In fact, it's a choice that is made at the group level.
We have historically used both tools for different needs. AT Internet was chosen in particular for its respect for privacy …
I have not tested any other product of this type, AT Internet was chosen by the company because it excels in its field and seems to be among the best in its class
To be very honest, it was a decision made before I joined the company. I think that if I had the choice, I would prefer to use Google Analytics from a media perspective. However, it is also a question of budget as Google Analytics Premium is more expensive.
According to Gartner, AT Internet is one of the best web analytics solutions on the market. Adding to this, we wanted to make sure that we get a secure solution in terms of legal issues. Furthermore, when considering the pricing of AT Internet, this solution is quite …
For our department we prefer to use AT Internet because we have been trained and we know the tool well. However when we create new ephemeral mini sites (which is quite rare) we may have to use Google Analytics because the solution seems simpler and faster to integrate for our …
AT Internet has many advantages over both such as fully processed real-time data availability (vs. comScore/ Adobe), video and audio analytics (vs. Google) and enhanced support.
AT Internet is as easy to use as GA, if not more. AT Internet has a much higher respect for user data privacy than Google does and won't use it for advertising. Data stays in Europe which, given how the US has little respect for user privacy and given how unpredictable their …
The brands we work with use exclusively Mediametrie Net Rating to check the audience of the publisher's websites. Knowing AT Internet is a partner is very important for us and shows the quality of AT Internet product. Google Analytics, even if it's used by a lot of publishers, …
Actually, AT internet did not stack up against other solutions. AT Internet is very expensive comparing other solutions. There are many open-sources and free tools in the market like Matomo. So we stopped to use AT Internet.
AT Internet is more comprehensive than Google Analytics. It allows you to make personalized requests, to access the API easily with high quotas. Other tools accompany the analytics solution and are included in the license. Data are also stored and processed in European Union …
I can sum it up quite easy: - GA isn't that privacy friendly, something we do require on our jobboard. - Matomo is a great program with some unique features compared to Piwik, but the lay-out is - in my eyes - more cluttered. Also the different type of database makes it a bit …
Piwik Pro stacks up with privacy and protecting your information and the data of our customers. The main problem with Piwik pro is that Google owns a lot of features that work better with google analytics, also the cloud version is paid. There are other things, like the …
One of the tools that we have used that has a great similarity to Piwik is Google Analytics. The great difference that exists is that Piwik provides us with security in our database, our organization changed to it. It was precisely for that reason Google Analytics Security is …
Piwik Pro's support for multiple sites saved me a lot of time. To view reports from numerous client sites, I'll have to access a single dashboard. Its digest reports save time and are simple enough for non-technical executives to understand. It gives us access to information …
Data owned and detailed tracking possibility compared to free Google Analytics and cost advantage and CDP possibilities compared to Google Analytics 360
When it comes to web analytics AT Internet is well suited. We introduced AT Internet in 2017 after an evaluation project with other professional analytics solutions. Starting with our corporate website we quickly rolled it out to our customer experience platform, our webshops, and our corporate intranet based on SharePoint 2013. Especially the use in our intranet brought significant improvements over the standard analytics features SP 2013 is offering. The ATI tag systems with their flexibility allow us to include company-specific properties and thus making it possible for us to analyze our intranet usage on segments such as locations, branches, and so on.
Actually, it is a platform that I would recommend to analyze all the data and information. It allows us to optimize the entire journey of our clients. It is a flexible tool and has excellent data security, through Piwik we can keep track of all our commercial objectives, create reports and analyze all campaigns.
It assists with following the conduct of clients when we make item developments.
AT Internet is utilized to break down the conduct of workers on another web and Android application project.
It is an investigation device, that empowers us to see client ventures, screen advanced KPIs, and once again use the information for promoting purposes.
Not so easy to make difference between users who are inside the company and those who come from other entities.
Some concept such as "taux de rebond" are not so easily explained.
Not so easy to rename the name of the pages consulted. For instance, if I have tagged a page as "Landing Page" but afterward I feel the name as misleading, I must ask my IT to change the name (ie "Home Page") but can't do it myself.
I gave this rating because I think that AT Internet is a good tool, user-friendly easy for onboarding and simple dashboards, however the majority of people use Google Analytics, especially media agency, it is easier for them to use Google Analytics.
Overall the experience is very good, it's quick, relaiable and does everything I would want. The only problems I have are matching the correct stats to what I want. It can be painful trying to find the right thing and the explanations are not always the clearest. That's the only issue i've found though.
I don't have any exemple in mind where AT Internet interface hasn't been available, i have always been able to use AT Internet when i needed it. The only issues to notice is that it happens sometimes that real time or D-1 datas are partially delayed.
I have not used the Support Team thereby I am unable to review how their Support Teams works. However, in an instance where I had an issue, my concerned department contacted their support team and I was provided with the solution of the problem I was facing within a short span of time.
We had to contact the support several times in the beginning and they really took their time to explain the different functions in detail. So in terms of support I can definitely recommend Piwik PRO.
The in-person training unfortunately does not match to our expectations, was too much focus on digital basis and not on AT Internet functionnalties and how to use it. We paid for one day and only 15 minutes at the end was focused on our real needs in terms of media analytics.
AT Internet suited our business needs at the best value. Adobe Analytics wasn't user friendly for non-technical employees, Google Analytics (free and premium) provided significant limitations in reporting and customization, and IBM Digital Analytics had limitations on the amount of API calls and dashboard reports you can create. Webtrends was very interesting, but we felt it was a lot of design without the same amount of value. None of these tools produced real-time data that could be reported on right away, some tools had data that you could view real-time but it wasn't in reports until 30 minutes later, or the closest thing to real-time was a 30-minute delay. AT Internet had a 4-minute delay which was crucial to our business needs. AT Internet also had the best recommendations for support, without a monthly service hour requirement, and with very responsive account managers.
I can sum it up quite easy: - GA isn't that privacy friendly, something we do require on our jobboard. - Matomo is a great program with some unique features compared to Piwik, but the lay-out is - in my eyes - more cluttered. Also the different type of database makes it a bit slower Besides these two I've also checked Plausible Analytics, which is a nice package but a bit to much bare bone for us right now. Especially on the part of custom dimensions
Regarding AT Internet possibilities, it could be adapted to small or large organizations, easy to set up. We can add sites in makets that we launch e-commerce.