Mercurial vs. Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Mercurial	Score 9.1 out of 10	N/A	Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool. It handles projects of any size and boasts an easy and intuitive interface. Mercurial handles projects of any size and kind. Every clone contains the whole project history, so most actions are local, fast and convenient. Mercurial supports a multitude of workflows and can enhance its functionality with extensions.	N/A
Plastic SCM	Score 8.2 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Plastic SCM is a full stack version control system that aims to make software configuration easy. It focuses on enabling dev teams get work done by facilitating branching, diffing and merging. The vendor says that for those purposes it provides cross-platform apps and GUIs with: Branch explorer Diffing and merging tools (both syntactic and semantic) On-premises and cloud repo management Code review mergebots (last mile…	$6.95 per user

Pricing

Mercurial

Plastic SCM

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Cloud Edition: $6.95
per user
Team Edition (on prem): $9.95
per user
Enterprise Edition: $23.25
per user
Enterprise Edition (perpetual): $595.00
per user

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Mercurial	Plastic SCM
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

* Educational institutions receive a substantial discount on Plastic SCM licensing fees * Corporate/volume pricing is available * For more information, please contact sales at sales@codicesoftware.com

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Mercurial	Plastic SCM
Considered Both Products	Mercurial Jakub Wilk President & Co-Founder Chose Mercurial When we chose Mercurial it was more popular from perspectives than Git and we have too many problems with the Microsoft team foundation solution. We also want to move from a centralized version of source control to a distributed one. We also were working more and more via the … Incentivized Helpful?	Plastic SCM Jacob James Salzberg Co-Founder Chose Plastic SCM Plastic has best integration with unity - zero issues, native, straightforward. Github feels more stable but for smaller and or indie teams plastic s version control feels much more under control - you click, you feel safe. moreover, there is no need for extra tools such as … Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Mercurial	Plastic SCM
Small Businesses	Git Score 10.0 out of 10	Salt Score 6.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Git Score 10.0 out of 10	Salt Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises	Perforce P4 Score 7.7 out of 10	Perforce P4 Score 7.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Mercurial	Plastic SCM
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	8.4 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Mercurial	Plastic SCM
Likelihood to Recommend	If you generally think that to develop software you have to choose one repository, then in my opinion you have to choose between Mercurial and Git, there is not other solution. Mercurial also has a good merge tool which i can recommend. This gives you the flexibility to push just the "part of the feature", and is much better suited in the case where the "part of feature" and some other "part of the feature" both contain changes to the same file. Incentivized Jakub Wilk President & Co-Founder Read full review	Plastic SCM is well suited for the distributed development environment, where branching and merging can easily be handled. Its a good tool for version controlling, especially for a big team which is contributing to a big project simultaneously. Situation where Plastic SCM is not at all well suited are : If the project is smaller one and need to be handled by couple of people. So in that case setting up Plastic SCM and educating people to work on it is not at all efficient Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Branch Distributed architecture Stable Platform independent Incentivized Jakub Wilk President & Co-Founder Read full review	Version Control Organizing Workflow Transparency Incentivized Jacob James Salzberg Co-Founder Read full review
Cons	Integration with visual studio More integrated tools When I install Mercurial I always have to do a hard restart of my computer. Incentivized Jakub Wilk President & Co-Founder Read full review	Interface Documentation Learning curve Unity integration Incentivized Jacob James Salzberg Co-Founder Read full review
Alternatives Considered	When we chose Mercurial it was more popular from perspectives than Git and we have too many problems with the Microsoft team foundation solution. We also want to move from a centralized version of source control to a distributed one. We also were working more and more via the Internet with our source control so distributed version was only solution. Incentivized Jakub Wilk President & Co-Founder Read full review	Plastic has best integration with unity - zero issues, native, straightforward. GitHub feels more stable but for smaller and or indie teams plastic s version control feels much more under control - you click, you feel safe. moreover, there is no need for extra tools such as gitkraken, gitlab, Sourcetree, fork, etc. it is really easy to develop games this way. Incentivized Jacob James Salzberg Co-Founder Read full review
Return on Investment	Improve time in merging Branching enables us to keep separate version per customer Good tool for programmers is sometimes a reason to stay Incentivized Jakub Wilk President & Co-Founder Read full review	Easy to use Cheap Better than git for us Artists love it Incentivized Jacob James Salzberg Co-Founder Read full review
ScreenShots		Plastic SCM Screenshots