Playwright vs. Worksoft Connective Automation Platform

Playwright

Playwright

15 Reviews and Ratings

Worksoft Connective Automation Platform

Worksoft Connective Automation Platform

15 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Playwright	Score 7.6 out of 10	N/A	A cross-browser testing tool, playwright supports all modern rendering engines including Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox. Users can test on Windows, Linux, and macOS, locally or on CI, headless or headed. It is also cross-language, so that the Playwright API can be used in TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, .NET, Java. Test Mobile Web. Native mobile emulation of Google Chrome for Android and Mobile Safari. The same rendering engine works on the Desktop and in the Cloud. Playright…	N/A
Worksoft	Score 7.3 out of 10	N/A	The Worksoft Connective Automation Platform is a suite of products that automates business processes from discovery, to testing to RPA. Worksoft Analyze and Worksoft Capture support automated process discovery. Worksoft Certify allows users to create, maintain, share, and consume automated end-to-end business process tests as part of continuous testing, integration, and delivery cycles. Finally, the Connective RPA is codeless solution to reusing automated processes, moving automation into…	N/A

Pricing

Playwright

Worksoft Connective Automation Platform

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Playwright	Worksoft
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Playwright	Worksoft Connective Automation Platform
Considered Both Products	Playwright Verified User Anonymous Chose Playwright We selected Playwright over the rest for several reasons. The learning curve is faster, making it easier for our team to get up to speed quickly. The setup is pretty straithtforwared, minimal configurartion needed and a great example included in the configuration which includes … Incentivized Helpful?	Worksoft Veeraiah Motukuri MDG Test Lead Chose Worksoft SAP TAO is only alternate tool I would suggest. Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Playwright	Worksoft Connective Automation Platform
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Selenium Score 8.1 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises	Selenium Score 8.1 out of 10	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Playwright	Worksoft Connective Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend	10.0 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Playwright	Worksoft Connective Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend	Easy to code and help in sanity regression and functional test cases Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review	As I have worked with various ERP automation tools, Worksoft certify is a best tool in terms of End-to-End testing for SAP business processes. It is easy to understand by business people Incentivized Veeraiah Motukuri MDG Test Lead Read full review
Pros	API UI Performance Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review	Prepared 25 end-to-end scenarios that leveraged 3,000 manual test cases and this was a big achievement for the customer to save the regression time and resources. It is fast to automate SAP projects Improved development cycle and nowadays customers are expecting "lights off" automation. We have scheduled lights off automation mode through Worksoft Certify. Incentivized Veeraiah Motukuri MDG Test Lead Read full review
Cons	bigger adoption mobile testing Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Worksoft Certify solution could be a bit more intuitive and user friendly Test Data Management - No testing system will work with bad or interpreted data Incentivized Veeraiah Motukuri MDG Test Lead Read full review
Usability	It makes automating complex user interactions easier, fits right into our CI/CD for continuous testing, and works great across different browsers. The Documentation is a plus, you don't really need to search a lot to understand and find what you need for the coding. The community is small but very helpful, which makes it a breeze to use and a must-have for keeping our software in top shape. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	We selected Playwright over the rest for several reasons. The learning curve is faster, making it easier for our team to get up to speed quickly. The setup is pretty straithtforwared, minimal configurartion needed and a great example included in the configuration which includes all the basics to start writing using that spec as a placeholder. Compared to Cypress, Playwright support multiple browsers out of the box, giving us broader testing coverage. Appium is great for mobile testing, but extremely slow. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	SAP TAO is only alternate tool I would suggest. Incentivized Veeraiah Motukuri MDG Test Lead Read full review
Return on Investment	Reduce of cost of manual testers Reduce of released bugs Reduce of costs of developer time Increase QA Coverage Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Positive: End to End business process validation and Fast Test development Licenses issues should be minimized Incentivized Veeraiah Motukuri MDG Test Lead Read full review
ScreenShots