Polycom RealPresence Group Series vs. Polycom Trio

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
The Polycom RealPresence Group Series is a video conferencing codec that connects to a standards-based video conferencing infrastructure to allow users to make video conference calls. There are three products in the series – RealPresence Group 300, RealPresence Group 500, and RealPresence Group 700. It is certified to use with Office 365 and Skype for Business.N/A
Polycom Trio
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Polycom Trio 8800 is a conference phone system that offers high-quality audio, as well as the ability to add video conferencing and HD content sharing. RealPresence Trio is Skype for Business on-prem and Office 365 Skype for Business Cloud PBX certified for conference calls and supports a 1080p30 USB camera for video conferencing. Users can share content from their personal devices, facilitating a BYOD (bring your own device) approach to collaboration.N/A
Pricing
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesPolycom Trio
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesPolycom Trio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesPolycom Trio
Considered Both Products
Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Polycom Group Series was very good for what it used to do for its time, however newer technology that provides a more simpler method to configure, join and host video conference meetings has come in the form of Zoom and [Microsoft] Teams which is hard to go back from and …
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
When I started at one of my jobs, they already have Lifesize VC equipment. It was nice, they worked and they were less expensive. But once we started transitioning things to Polycom it was a night/day difference. Some of our large conference rooms had audio issues that the …
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Poly has outlasted other competitor's products. I have reviewed Lifesize as one alternative. Ironically, I was impressed with the overall quality over Poly, however, the product did not last as well as Poly units.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
The Polycom RealPresence Group Series was top of the line. It had a lot more features as well as the ability to integrate with Microsoft Teams. With Highfive, you had to pay to keep the device running and it was more like renting it. Although we pay maintenance with Polycom we …
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Polycom is the most flexible video conferencing hardware solution on the market. They provide a fantastic infrastructure but also have the option to directly register or convert to a cloud service endpoint!
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
We have used Microsoft Teams Rooms in some of our smaller huddle rooms that still require video, and this was due to the lower cost of the Microsoft Teams Room systems over the Polycom Presence Group series. The Microsoft Teams Rooms are perfect for small, less-used rooms, as …
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Conference room systems do not seem to be commonly integrated with Skype for Business, so limited usability. Lifesize looked attractive, but the lower cost and local support of Polycom put it ahead.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
I have reviewed Skype and Skype for Business previously, and while I have enjoyed the use of those systems, the video and audio quality of Polycom RealPresence Group Series is far superior. Polycom Real presence Group Series has more functions and capabilities, and experiences …
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Went for Polycom due to the INTERNAL quality of HD room to room quality. If we were only looking for external audio or web meetings an external partner and platform seems to be a better choice. But a web provider cannot match the internal COS high-speed WAN quality (I believe).
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
We compared Polycom against Cisco and the potential need for Skype for Business was a deciding factor.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
I have not used other formal VC software rather used WebEx Video and FaceTime which are more intuitive to use.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
As a previous AV installer, the Polycom line of product always superseded other hard codecs due to the reliability. Other expensive codec's don't supply the same features for the price of Polycom.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
The quality and flexibility of the GS still wins...but not by a big enough margin to justify it as often as we used to.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
The video & audio quality is superior.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
With our investment in the RealPresence infrastructure it just makes sense to use a RealPresence endpoint. The other endpoints integrate with additional work, but the group series just work.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Other departments have been testing and using them. I am unaware of there opinions at this point.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Polycom works better for groups 2-5, but skype is much easier/simple for 1 to 1 connections or multiple connections as long as there is only 1 person from each site
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Polycom is a great company that is always on the edge of new and improving technology.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
We are still evaluating more about the differences between the two devices and how they handle audio and video within a call. Along with bandwidth, flexiblilty in meetings, and security features.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
The GroupSeries has performed much better than all the alternative solutions we have tried. We have been a Lifesize shop for a long time, but their direction was cloud only and more proprietary so we wanted a more open solution. We also use Skype For Business and there is …
Polycom Trio
Chose Polycom Trio
Unfortunately, I am not aware of other products that are similar to Polycom Trio that we've used or evaluated in the past or currently.
Chose Polycom Trio
We found the Yealink Conference Phones to be laggy in navigation, where as the Polycom Trio was snappy to use.
Chose Polycom Trio
While Yealink was priced very competitively it couldn't math the functionality and ease of use of the Polycom units.
Chose Polycom Trio
Polycom Trio provides better conference call quality, picks up voice from corners of the room with additional mics for large room, better widescreen display, and it was mostly the user satisfaction which made us choose Polycom Trio.
Chose Polycom Trio
We preferred the iPad to the Polycom Trio because of the Price, Screen Realestate as opposed to the Trio, and the multiple use cases for an iPad in Zoom Rooms.
Best Alternatives
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesPolycom Trio
Small Businesses
Lifesize Video Conferencing
Lifesize Video Conferencing
Score 10.0 out of 10
Lifesize Video Conferencing
Lifesize Video Conferencing
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Desk Series
Cisco Desk Series
Score 8.5 out of 10
Cisco Headsets
Cisco Headsets
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Desk Series
Cisco Desk Series
Score 8.5 out of 10
Cisco Headsets
Cisco Headsets
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesPolycom Trio
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesPolycom Trio
Likelihood to Recommend
While expensive, you can't compare the cost and time of people flying all over the globe to have in-person meetings when 95% of the time they can be done between a RealPresense.... even more so in today's post-pandemic world. You just get such a better video and audio experience than a Teams meeting. We were also able to connect our RealPresence to Teams so that you can join a meeting and choose whether to join it from your desk with Teams or from a conference room with a Real Presence. This solved 2 issues for us in that there's now a simple link on the Real Presence to join a meeting instead of making a direct phone call to another RP device, and for meetings with 1 or 2 people from a site, they can now join this meeting from their desk and free up the conference room for a large meeting.
Read full review
The Polycom Trio is a great tool for huddle rooms that don't rely as much on a responsive screen. There are better room controllers out there, but if you just need a good speaker and microphone combo in the traditional conference phone style then the Polycom trio is a good option.
Read full review
Pros
  • Polycom are still a high-end videoconferencing manufacturer and it shows. The build quality is very high, with quality components provided. In the current environment where 'huddle-room' systems are taking over and are a mix of solutions from multiple manufacturers, you can tell the difference when you open the box and get dedicated hardware that is designed to work as a single package.
  • The audio quality is very good. May sound like an odd thing to consider audio quality before video quality, but if the sound is poor, it doesn't matter how good the video is - you wont stay in the meeting.
  • Great video from the dedicated cameras. The image quality is high and the camera is silent when it moves to presets.
Read full review
  • Lync/Skype Integration - The Trio can be used in an existing organization that regularly uses Skype for Business, it makes the user experience seamless.
  • Phone Conferences - If you have the PBX Licenses installed, the phone can be used to dial out and receive phone calls inbound. Sound Clarity is very good.
  • Video Conference - Fair video quality for using existing Skype for Business infrastructure.
Read full review
Cons
  • Install was a bit fast with a tech that was not the best, this lead to a round of support issues, fixes, and training.
  • Much of the internal learning was on our own with trial and error, and the Outlook integration was not really 100% (abandoned that as users could not understand and remember the shortcomings when meetings changed. Moved to reservation-less.
  • Stability was better after a major upgrade(only 1 year old) and a better Polycom tech.
Read full review
  • It was frustrating to not be able to share a user's desktop in a Skype for Business meeting using the People+Content.
  • From a design perspective, I don't like how the USB port is on the side. Now that we're running in Skype USB optimized mode, we are unable to hide the USB that connects to the SmartDock.
  • I wish that it had a secondary option in addition to POE to provide power to the unit. Running one powered usb cable from the Smartdock to the trio would be ideal.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We love the product and is totally integrated in our company.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The directory is slightly dated and unless you have a Skype for Business integration license, dialing users into a call is difficult. The Group Series Remote whilst minimalistic is actually more difficult to use than the previous HDX remote. Having to recharge the battery on the group series remote is both annoying and difficult as if you do not keep on top of it, you will be faced with a situation where the remote is not working and then have to try and find another one. Not ideal if you need to start a video call (assuming auto join has not been enabled in the admin portal).
Read full review
A well known product that most users are familiar with and simple enough for new users to learn and understand.
Read full review
Support Rating
I can't say I've needed support more than a handful of times. One was for trying to connect a Polycom Conference phone and a Real Presence together. After a few months, we came to the conclusion it wasn't possible, that was the only frustrating occurance with support. Any other time if we needed to RMA a device, it was very smooth.
Read full review
I have never contacted support for this product.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Polycom Group Series was very good for what it used to do for its time, however newer technology that provides a more simpler method to configure, join and host video conference meetings has come in the form of Zoom and [Microsoft] Teams which is hard to go back from and therefore means the Polycom codecs of yesteryear are rapidly becoming phased out. The Polycom Trio is a more forward thinking technology which can be configured for the likes of Teams, Zoom and Zoom Phone and with the Poly Studio X range of codecs, this is ultimately the way forward.
Read full review
Polycom Trio provides better conference call quality, picks up voice from corners of the room with additional mics for large room, better widescreen display, and it was mostly the user satisfaction which made us choose Polycom Trio.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have been able to increase productivity by spending less time navigating through a phone directory to call someone, and to find out if and when they are available.
  • We can determine if someone is available through the notifications on the phone screen itself or use the instant messaging function, which are both linked to our Outlook calendars.
  • We are able to more quickly connect our students to resources and other professionals on campus by being able to anticipate who is available to meet with them or speak with them over the phone, before even having to make a call.
Read full review
  • Since we were really looking for a device that could provide Skype for Business Online services (web conferencing/video/audio/local screen presenting) at a reasonable price point, I cannot say that this device meets all of our needs. The device has to be at least 99.99% reliable. This is about 60% there. Audio is definitely in the 99% range. Local screen presenting is probably around 75%. Video and web conferencing is about 70%. To comfortably deploy a device in the wild you really need to have 99% reliability. It has to work when its needed. I can understand an occasional hiccup, but one every other day is a too many. If you are replacing older SoundStations with an IP or Skype based audio solution, then this is it.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Polycom Trio Screenshots

Screenshot of Polycom Trio 8800 - Skype for Business UI