Polycom RealPresence Group Series vs. VEEDEEO

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
The Polycom RealPresence Group Series is a video conferencing codec that connects to a standards-based video conferencing infrastructure to allow users to make video conference calls. There are three products in the series – RealPresence Group 300, RealPresence Group 500, and RealPresence Group 700. It is certified to use with Office 365 and Skype for Business.N/A
VEEDEEO
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$18
per month
Pricing
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesVEEDEEO
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
SIP/H.323 Gatekeeper
$18
per month
Web Pro
$58
per month
Enterprise VCS
$110
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesVEEDEEO
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesVEEDEEO
Considered Both Products
Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Polycom Group Series was very good for what it used to do for its time, however newer technology that provides a more simpler method to configure, join and host video conference meetings has come in the form of Zoom and [Microsoft] Teams which is hard to go back from and …
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
When I started at one of my jobs, they already have Lifesize VC equipment. It was nice, they worked and they were less expensive. But once we started transitioning things to Polycom it was a night/day difference. Some of our large conference rooms had audio issues that the …
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Poly has outlasted other competitor's products. I have reviewed Lifesize as one alternative. Ironically, I was impressed with the overall quality over Poly, however, the product did not last as well as Poly units.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
The Polycom RealPresence Group Series was top of the line. It had a lot more features as well as the ability to integrate with Microsoft Teams. With Highfive, you had to pay to keep the device running and it was more like renting it. Although we pay maintenance with Polycom we …
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Polycom is the most flexible video conferencing hardware solution on the market. They provide a fantastic infrastructure but also have the option to directly register or convert to a cloud service endpoint!
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
We have used Microsoft Teams Rooms in some of our smaller huddle rooms that still require video, and this was due to the lower cost of the Microsoft Teams Room systems over the Polycom Presence Group series. The Microsoft Teams Rooms are perfect for small, less-used rooms, as …
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Conference room systems do not seem to be commonly integrated with Skype for Business, so limited usability. Lifesize looked attractive, but the lower cost and local support of Polycom put it ahead.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
I have reviewed Skype and Skype for Business previously, and while I have enjoyed the use of those systems, the video and audio quality of Polycom RealPresence Group Series is far superior. Polycom Real presence Group Series has more functions and capabilities, and experiences …
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Went for Polycom due to the INTERNAL quality of HD room to room quality. If we were only looking for external audio or web meetings an external partner and platform seems to be a better choice. But a web provider cannot match the internal COS high-speed WAN quality (I believe).
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
We compared Polycom against Cisco and the potential need for Skype for Business was a deciding factor.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
I have not used other formal VC software rather used WebEx Video and FaceTime which are more intuitive to use.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
As a previous AV installer, the Polycom line of product always superseded other hard codecs due to the reliability. Other expensive codec's don't supply the same features for the price of Polycom.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
The quality and flexibility of the GS still wins...but not by a big enough margin to justify it as often as we used to.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
The video & audio quality is superior.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
With our investment in the RealPresence infrastructure it just makes sense to use a RealPresence endpoint. The other endpoints integrate with additional work, but the group series just work.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Other departments have been testing and using them. I am unaware of there opinions at this point.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Polycom works better for groups 2-5, but skype is much easier/simple for 1 to 1 connections or multiple connections as long as there is only 1 person from each site
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Polycom is a great company that is always on the edge of new and improving technology.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
We are still evaluating more about the differences between the two devices and how they handle audio and video within a call. Along with bandwidth, flexiblilty in meetings, and security features.
Chose Polycom RealPresence Group Series
The GroupSeries has performed much better than all the alternative solutions we have tried. We have been a Lifesize shop for a long time, but their direction was cloud only and more proprietary so we wanted a more open solution. We also use Skype For Business and there is …
VEEDEEO

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesVEEDEEO
Small Businesses
Lifesize Video Conferencing
Lifesize Video Conferencing
Score 10.0 out of 10
Lifesize Video Conferencing
Lifesize Video Conferencing
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Desk Series
Cisco Desk Series
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cisco Desk Series
Cisco Desk Series
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Desk Series
Cisco Desk Series
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cisco Desk Series
Cisco Desk Series
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesVEEDEEO
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Polycom RealPresence Group SeriesVEEDEEO
Likelihood to Recommend
While expensive, you can't compare the cost and time of people flying all over the globe to have in-person meetings when 95% of the time they can be done between a RealPresense.... even more so in today's post-pandemic world. You just get such a better video and audio experience than a Teams meeting. We were also able to connect our RealPresence to Teams so that you can join a meeting and choose whether to join it from your desk with Teams or from a conference room with a Real Presence. This solved 2 issues for us in that there's now a simple link on the Real Presence to join a meeting instead of making a direct phone call to another RP device, and for meetings with 1 or 2 people from a site, they can now join this meeting from their desk and free up the conference room for a large meeting.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Polycom are still a high-end videoconferencing manufacturer and it shows. The build quality is very high, with quality components provided. In the current environment where 'huddle-room' systems are taking over and are a mix of solutions from multiple manufacturers, you can tell the difference when you open the box and get dedicated hardware that is designed to work as a single package.
  • The audio quality is very good. May sound like an odd thing to consider audio quality before video quality, but if the sound is poor, it doesn't matter how good the video is - you wont stay in the meeting.
  • Great video from the dedicated cameras. The image quality is high and the camera is silent when it moves to presets.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Install was a bit fast with a tech that was not the best, this lead to a round of support issues, fixes, and training.
  • Much of the internal learning was on our own with trial and error, and the Outlook integration was not really 100% (abandoned that as users could not understand and remember the shortcomings when meetings changed. Moved to reservation-less.
  • Stability was better after a major upgrade(only 1 year old) and a better Polycom tech.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
We love the product and is totally integrated in our company.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The directory is slightly dated and unless you have a Skype for Business integration license, dialing users into a call is difficult. The Group Series Remote whilst minimalistic is actually more difficult to use than the previous HDX remote. Having to recharge the battery on the group series remote is both annoying and difficult as if you do not keep on top of it, you will be faced with a situation where the remote is not working and then have to try and find another one. Not ideal if you need to start a video call (assuming auto join has not been enabled in the admin portal).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I can't say I've needed support more than a handful of times. One was for trying to connect a Polycom Conference phone and a Real Presence together. After a few months, we came to the conclusion it wasn't possible, that was the only frustrating occurance with support. Any other time if we needed to RMA a device, it was very smooth.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Polycom Group Series was very good for what it used to do for its time, however newer technology that provides a more simpler method to configure, join and host video conference meetings has come in the form of Zoom and [Microsoft] Teams which is hard to go back from and therefore means the Polycom codecs of yesteryear are rapidly becoming phased out. The Polycom Trio is a more forward thinking technology which can be configured for the likes of Teams, Zoom and Zoom Phone and with the Poly Studio X range of codecs, this is ultimately the way forward.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We have been able to increase productivity by spending less time navigating through a phone directory to call someone, and to find out if and when they are available.
  • We can determine if someone is available through the notifications on the phone screen itself or use the instant messaging function, which are both linked to our Outlook calendars.
  • We are able to more quickly connect our students to resources and other professionals on campus by being able to anticipate who is available to meet with them or speak with them over the phone, before even having to make a call.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots