TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

PortSwigger Burp Suite vs. Veracode

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    PortSwigger Burp Suite

    Score9.7 out of 10
    N/AThe Burp Suite, from UK-based alcohol-themed software company PortSwigger Web Security, is an application security and testing solution.N/A

    Veracode

    Score8.7 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine.N/A
    Pricing
    PortSwigger Burp SuiteVeracode
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    PortSwigger Burp SuiteVeracode
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Developer pricing options available
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    PortSwigger Burp SuiteVeracode
    Considered Both Products
    PortSwigger Web Security
    No answer on this topic
    Veracode
    Chose Veracode
    I found SonarQube to have some decent data for code quality checks but it underperformed for code security.

    Snyk is a decent product and strong competitor to Veracode for SCA. Snyk's SAST offering is not as good as Veracode and does not support as many languages.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode is the clear choice. We evaluated the other products, but none compared to Veracode as an industry standard.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    None
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Reduced false positives, developers can identify vulnerabilities at early stage -shift left process. The security labs help developers.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode speaks on very practical, actual security issues rather than thousands of code quality issues.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    The overall product selection was done by someone else for many reasons.
    What I liked more about Contrast than Veracode was the type of results it gave. Findings were a lot more actionable since these were observable exploits that could be easily tested by the security team …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Our organization uses both Fortify and Veracode. Veracode is great for any applications using third party components and testing applications that Fortify doesn't support. Veracode is typically faster with supporting new technologies, given the reliance on binaries as compared …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode I think stands at the top of the pile when it comes to do static scans of the code base.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    They are very different tools but cover roughly the same area.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Past experience with Veracode made this the frontrunner.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Mathematica Policy Research has used a few open source tools to perform SAST. The open source products do not hold up with Veracode. We have also written some of our own custom SAST applications for specific web products. We do not use Veracode for Dynamic Application Security …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    PortSwigger Burp SuiteVeracode
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (11 ratings)
    8.6
    (138 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.3
    (27 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (67 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)