Posit vs. SAS Enterprise Guide

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Posit, formerly RStudio, is a modular data science platform, combining open source and commercial products.N/A
SAS Enterprise Guide
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
SAS Enterprise Guide is a menu-driven, Windows GUI tool for SAS.N/A
Pricing
PositSAS Enterprise Guide
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PositSAS Enterprise Guide
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PositSAS Enterprise Guide
Considered Both Products
Posit
Chose Posit
SPSS is good for folks who are not as familiar with statistics, and for those who are older or more technologically-experienced and may be overwhelmed by Posit's products. It's also really great for teaching students and getting them exposed. However, because Posit is free, …
Chose Posit
Posit is far better than Jupyter Notebook and Minitab in this regard that Posit is actually capable of doing all kind of analytical stuffs like data pre-processing, wrangling, validation and visualization. On the other hand, Jupyter Notebook can be used for python programming …
Chose Posit
Posit is way way way more reliable than Excel for anything more involved than a quick spreadsheet. Faster speeds, greater charting abilities, flexible functionality and more efficient memory usage. Python is still my go-to for anything that needs integration, but Posit beats …
Chose Posit
I've used ArcGIS and ESRI for similar analysis and while both have their advantages, RStudio is much better suited for running advanced statistics and processing large volumes of data. It can also produce quality maps, however, for visually attractive maps and graphs, ArcGIS is …
Chose Posit
RStudio is better than python for visualizations but it is less common to use it in many organizations. Excel and PowerBI are better for visualization but, they can only be used for simple models. I would choose R Studio for statistical analysis, ML, or DL because the language …
Chose Posit
RStudio works really well compared to competitors such as Jupyter Notebook where there is no environment to visualize variables. RStudio on the other hand is much easier to use and provides the right set of environments for users.
Chose Posit
inter-departmental collaboration - my first choice would be TIBCO Spotfire natural language processing and knowledge graphs - my first choice would be Python information security & visualizations (including d3.js libraries) - my first choice is RStudio
Chose Posit
RStudio is more than a home for a dashboard. It is a content management system for data science. It hosts models, APIs, runs scripts, AND hosts dashboards.
Chose Posit
RStudio stacks up pretty well against its competition. For me, it is really up to personal preference and what you are used to when deciding between the competitions. I like that Python packages have the most external resources, so it's easier to troubleshoot. But RStudio does …
Chose Posit
The most similar products to RStudio that I have used include IBM SPSS and Tableau Prep. In my experience, SPSS is more intuitive and has less of a learning curve; I used it extensively in my undergraduate career in Statistics and Cognitive Science research. While RStudio has …
Chose Posit
RStudio stacks up pretty well against Anaconda. However, Anaconda might be the first choice for someone who likes Python for their analytics and machine learning needs. In the past, I have found it seamless to connect Jupyter Notebook (in Anaconda suite) to integrate with other …
Chose Posit
RStudio was provided as the most customizable. It was also strictly the most feature-rich as far as enabling our organization to script, run, and make use of R open-source packages in our data analysis workstreams. It also provided some support for python, which was useful …
Chose Posit
Personally, I would prefer SPSS over RStudio and SAS, but the cost for licenses for SPSS deters me from continuing to go with IBM's statistics software. RStudio has the advantage in that it is low cost and there are a lot of available resources on YouTube available for users …
Chose Posit
Using [RStudio] requires greater knowledge of statistics and code than SPSS, which has a more simple "point and click" interface. [RStudio] is similar to SAS in its user interface and [requires] the user to write their own queries. [RStudio]'s main advantage is an open-source …
Chose Posit
I tried Stata because it's a standard tool for economists but it doesn't have the flexibility and breadth of R and RStudio. I didn't try other IDEs for R.
Chose Posit
RStudio is free and so that is the main reason that I use it. I like that it is open source and so there are lots of support on the internet. I tried SAS JMP and Python in a text editor but RStudio was better than either of those options for cost and code flexibility …
Chose Posit
RStudio is as good as any software available in the market and is better off than some as it is free. Since it is open source it is improving day by day. I would prefer RStudio over any other tool any day. I would recommend every data analyst to give RStudio a try.
Chose Posit
Much better GUI and customizability than BlueSky. I am able to do a variety of tasks at a much quicker pace.
Chose Posit
I understand the Jupyter notebook is supposed to be good like RStudio, and I've been exposed to it a little bit. But my experience using it has been very little.
Chose Posit
Amazon Quicksight, Power bi, SAS EG, Tableau, Salesforce (TREVI) - Victoria, SharePoint.
Chose Posit
I prefer SPSS to RStudio, but RStudio is very cheap in comparison to the cost of SPSS. IBM's SPSS does a better job holding the hands of users, but it does come at a very expensive license cost. RStudio is a little bit more difficult to use but is cheap.
Chose Posit
These all work synergistically and fulfill slightly different roles. In general this is determined by complexity of task and the degree of training and expertise of the end user. RStudio works well for organisations looking to move into doing more complex analytics. In general …
Chose Posit
There are loads of people in the BI (Business Intelligence) space, of course... but I wouldn't touch any of them because none of them offer anything like the R and Python support that RStudio does. RStudio publishes open-source, they're a public benefit corporation, and they …
SAS Enterprise Guide
Chose SAS Enterprise Guide
Python-based platforms like Pandas or Spark are very good too at displaying data and do exploratory analysis. I definitely prefer them to SAS EG. It's just too slow, and doesn't let you peek into the data very easily. Lots of clicking, and I'd rather just write some code, …
Chose SAS Enterprise Guide
This was used by the unit before I joined. It was compared to SPSS but I was not included in that discussion.
Chose SAS Enterprise Guide
Although not used in the enterprise, I have used Anaconda Python to shape and cleanse data from Excel reports that was too difficult for SAS to complete. The object oriented nature and the Pandas package made ingestion of the data and reshaping more useful in this use case. …
Chose SAS Enterprise Guide
SAS EG has better Graphical User Interface to build project trees and help users to create data queries/calculations. SAS EG can handle bigger data sets compared to other programs. You can easily clean the data sets and manipulate the data. It is easier to send the project tree …
Chose SAS Enterprise Guide
Why I prefer SAS EG: Data processing speed is much faster than that R Studio. It can load any amount of data and any type of data like structured or unstructured or semi-structured. Its output delivery system by which we have the output in PDF file makes it very comfortable to …
Chose SAS Enterprise Guide
It gives more flexibility in terms of writing codes, and you're able too see expected output and then you go on to modify
Chose SAS Enterprise Guide
Tableau : A good tool for visualisations but SAS is better for running production scripts & using adhoc analysis
Chose SAS Enterprise Guide
I haven't used SPSS myself but from what I was told, integration of data was much more limited and not easy to used.
Also, the number of people with SPSS knowledge is less than the number of SAS users so finding workforce can be an issue.
The whole SAS solution just made much …
Features
PositSAS Enterprise Guide
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Posit
9.3
Ratings
11% above category average
SAS Enterprise Guide
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Posit
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
SAS Enterprise Guide
-
Ratings
Visualization8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Posit
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
SAS Enterprise Guide
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Posit
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
SAS Enterprise Guide
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Posit
9.9
Ratings
15% above category average
SAS Enterprise Guide
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PositSAS Enterprise Guide
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Alteryx Platform
Alteryx Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PositSAS Enterprise Guide
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
5.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.7
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
5.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.3
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PositSAS Enterprise Guide
Likelihood to Recommend
In my humble opinion, if you are working on something related to Statistics, RStudio is your go-to tool. But if you are looking for something in Machine Learning, look out for Python. The beauty is that there are packages now by which you can write Python/SQL in R. Cross-platform functionality like such makes RStudio way ahead of its competition. A couple of chinks in RStudio armor are very small and can be considered as nagging just for the sake of argument. Other than completely based on programming language, I couldn't find significant drawbacks to using RStudio. It is one of the best free software available in the market at present.
Read full review
For writing out longer code creation for shaping data on complicated reports, the clean UI is helpful. If exploring data though, SAS Studio would be better suited given its easier interface for GUI graph building.
Read full review
Pros
  • RStudio does an excellent job providing a clean user interface for R or Shiny applications
  • RStudio integrates natively with version control software
  • Users can program with either R or Python
  • RStudio has a command line built in, eliminating the need for a separate program for a REPL
Read full review
  • It can load a huge amount of data as compared to R Studio and Excel.
  • Data processing speed is very fast, millions of records are loaded into this software very easily and data manipulation is also very easy.
  • Inbuilt Statistical functions and procedures make it very comfortable to use for non analytics professionals as well.
Read full review
Cons
  • Ability to scale across the company is limited based on the users license, cannot share a dashboard to the general view of the company.
  • Ability to retain session - not simple method to customize view per user (e.g., once session is ended, the users will return next time to the baseline view).
  • Ability to enable communication between multiple users - leave notes, tag other users, or share specific view.
Read full review
  • I would like to see advance interactions with external databases to be able to kill ongoing queries from SAS. As of now, you can stop pretty much any ongoing process besides the one running on a remote database (killing SAS/EG doesn't stop the remote process)
  • When creating prompts for programs, it would be nice to be able to have conditional prompts (based on the selection of other prompts). The prompts are clearly a recent feature and constantly under development but I wish it would be more powerful.
  • More of a SAS metadata issue but when loading SAS/EG (first connection to the server), it takes a few seconds which feels like a long time. I really don't understand why the initialization of the session can take so long. Don't get me wrong, this has no real impact on productivity but that 10s delay just feels really like eternity when you want to run some code in a new session.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
There is no other platform that meets our needs. Even if it was terrible we would still use it but fortunately for us it is a very solid project with a great support team. I hope in the future to expand our use and get more licences as well as upgrade to RStudio workbench but for now we are very happy.
Read full review
On account of current user experience and the organization-wide acceptance.
Read full review
Usability
For someone who learns how to use the software and picks up on the "language" of R, it's very easy to use. For beginners, it can be hard and might require a course, as well as the appropriate statistical training to understand what packages to use and when
Read full review
It's not all bad, but I don't believe that an enterprise purchase of SAS is worth the expense considering the widely available set of tools in the data analytics space at the moment. In my company, it's a good tool because others use it. Otherwise, I wouldn't purchase a new set of it because it doesn't have some of the better analytical functions in it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
RStudio is very available and cheap to use. It needs to be updated every once in a while, but the updates tend to be quick and they do not hinder my ability to make progress. I have not experienced any RStudio outages, and I have used the application quite a bit for a variety of statistical analyses
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Since R is trendy among statisticians, you can find lots of help from the data science/ stats communities. If you need help with anything related to RStudio or R, google it or search on StackOverflow, you might easily find the solution that you are looking for.
Read full review
Although I use SAS support for information on functions, these are SAS related and haven't really come across anything that is specifically for SAS EG.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
We did it at the individual level: anyone willing to code in R can use it. No real deployment involved.
Read full review
I've not worked hands-on with the implementation team, but there were no escalations barring a few hiccups in the deployment due to change in requirement & adoption to our company's remote servers.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
RStudio was provided as the most customizable. It was also strictly the most feature-rich as far as enabling our organization to script, run, and make use of R open-source packages in our data analysis workstreams. It also provided some support for python, which was useful when we had R heavy code with some python threaded in. Overall we picked Rstudio for the features it provided for our data analysis needs and the ability to interface with our existing resources.
Read full review
Python-based platforms like Pandas or Spark are very good too at displaying data and do exploratory analysis. I definitely prefer them to SAS EG. It's just too slow, and doesn't let you peek into the data very easily. Lots of clicking, and I'd rather just write some code, rather do clicking.
Read full review
Scalability
I think that RStudio scales pretty well based on the size of the datasets I'm using. It has multithreading capabilities unlike some other statistical analysis programs which is very useful in cutting down on time. The format of RStudio's syntax also makes it very easy to replicate regardless off the scale of the analysis and data set
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Using it for data science in a very big and old company, the most positive impact, from my point of view, has been the ability of spreading data culture across the group. Shortening the path from data to value.
  • Still it's hard to quantify economic benefits, we are struggling and it's a great point of attention, since splitting out the contribution of the single aspects of a project (and getting the RStudio pie) is complicated.
  • What is sure is that, in the long run, RStudio is boosting productivity and making the process in which is embedded more efficient (cost reduction).
Read full review
  • Faster decision making, through powerful big data handling functionalities.
  • Faster operations on daily basis, once the project tree is built, unskilled personnel can use it in their daily operation.
  • Don’t need to choose SAS EG if you are not going to be handling big data. (such as over 1 million rows and 50 columns)
  • You need skilled personnel to build the initial project tree.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Posit Screenshots

Screenshot of Posit runs on most desktops or on a server and accessed over the webScreenshot of Posit supports authoring HTML, PDF, Word Documents, and slide showsScreenshot of Posit supports interactive graphics with Shiny and ggvisScreenshot of Shiny combines the computational power of R with the interactivity of the modern webScreenshot of Remote Interactive Sessions: Start R and Python processes from Posit Workbench within various systems such as Kubernetes and SLURM with Launcher.Screenshot of Jupyter: Author and edit Python code with Jupyter using the same Posit Workbench infrastructure.