Planview IdeaPlace vs. Powernoodle

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Planview IdeaPlace
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Planview IdeaPlace offers an integrated, configurable “idea-to-impact” innovation management solution to capture, evaluate, and prioritize ideas and includes: Unified Innovation Ecosystem: Unifies innovation activity into a single value delivery system keeping an organization, processes, objectives, and customers aligned. Democratized Ideation: Captures and synthesizes ideas from everyone, whether a top-down challenge or proposed by a user. …N/A
Powernoodle
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Powernoodle is designed to help leaders make better quality decisions by quickly and effectively engaging the collective wisdom of stakeholders. The vendor aims to provide the most powerful, yet easy to use, Decision Engagement Platform. Cloud technology is fused with 50 years of cognitive, behavioral, and decision science to focus stakeholders, and minimize the biases, barriers and dysfunctions typical to most organizations that get in the way of making quality…N/A
Pricing
Planview IdeaPlacePowernoodle
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Planview IdeaPlacePowernoodle
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Planview IdeaPlacePowernoodle
User Ratings
Planview IdeaPlacePowernoodle
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Planview IdeaPlacePowernoodle
Likelihood to Recommend
If you have a community with more than 100 active users, and you're looking for ideas around operational improvements that can be acted on in a 6-12 month window, Spigit will work great, and it's one of the best options out there. If you're trying to customize the platform much, you should plan on paying Spigit's service group to do that for you, because it's not easy to do yourself. If you're looking for ideas that will take more than about a year to implement, Spigit is as good as anyone else because that's a really tough thing to do in an innovation community!
Read full review
Well Suited:
  • Groups needing to make a decision
  • Democratically based decision making
  • Sensitive topics
  • Discussions Groups needing input
Read full review
Pros
  • Acknowledges and supports the culture around the problem and market it is trying to serve. Just using the platform won't solve our problem, we need a cultural shift and Spigit has helped support that process.
  • Customer service - just overall amazing service. Responses are very quickly turned around, they've gone the extra mile many, many times. They are also very open to platform improvements and take feedback very seriously.
  • As the system administrator, I feel their platform incorporates a great balance of templates, out-of-the-box formatting, etc., and customizable content. In a nutshell, we are able to do what we want but we don't have to spend forever to do it. We can use what they have or we can add in our own design.
Read full review
  • Powernoodle helped us to engage a wider and more diverse spectrum of people than we ever thought possible.
  • The customer service is wonderful, I really enjoyed working with their employees to create a safe space for our end users, which ultimately gave us great results.
  • Very user-friendly.
  • People felt comfortable with Powernoodle and trust the anaominty of it, so they could speak their minds without fear of backlash.
Read full review
Cons
  • Versioning of ideas.
  • "Building block" comments, highlighted and embedded in the original idea by moderators and authors.
  • Italian version.
  • Can be improved in the implementation funnel of ideas.
  • Interfacing with other platforms e.g. management platforms, gamification platforms, LMS platforms.
  • Poor gamification.
Read full review
  • Our group found that it was sometimes difficult to respond immediately to directions from the facilitator, and that we needed time to absorb what was written on the tiles and what we were being asked to do. This put us behind on the schedule laid out for us. Part of the reason for this is, I'm sure, the fact that Powernoodle was new to all of us.
  • Merging tiles that were similar is something only the facilitator can do, but it was confusing at times for our group to work together to decide which tiles should be merged. I think each of us should have emailed the facilitator with our ideas for merging tiles, however, this didn't happen with our group. We ended up having additional "private" meetings without the facilitator to make decisions about what should be merged. Perhaps there is a better way to handle this important step of merging tiles.
Read full review
Usability
This rating was given because, Planview is an establish platform used within the organisation for number of years, therefore is a well known platform by the wider business community. Reusing Planview was ease due to user familiarity with the platform, so use of Planview IdeaPlace was logical and reduce the learning curve for users.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Planview IdeaPlace (IP) stacked up very well against our old product, for example Planview IdeaPlace features and integrations with Microsoft O365 products was major attraction. Our leadership also has a simplification agenda, so the reuse of Planview IdeaPlace for this capability, tick all the right boxes and help use achieved a key CIO objective.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • I've seen ideas that could have come through existing channels but may have faced layers of barriers before getting to the right decision makers bypass all of that bureaucracy and get the level of support needed to proceed. In one case, the value of just one of those ideas created a 27x ROI over the annual expense of running the software and the supporting team. In other words, that one idea justifies the existence of the program for 2 1/2 more decades if there are no other wins.
  • Because the program can literally engage every employee, it tends to be the most visible and tangible innovation asset for the masses. Along side (and connected with) other innovation capabilities like internal incubators, R&D labs, design teams, lean programs, etc., it tends to be the tool that delivers on a strategy of total employee engagement for enterprise wide innovation. Employee perception of innovation has improved significantly since the inception of this program.
  • The software can be used in other ways beyond innovation ideation to drive corporate values, employee engagement, and employee feedback and insights. In nearly every deployment where I have been involved, we have found ways beyond ideation to engage crowds to generate other value for the business. In each case, this was engagement that could not have been delivered in any other way except for a crowd-sourcing technology like Spigit.
Read full review
  • While we are still in the beginning stages of taking action on the decisions we made using the Powernoodle process, I have no doubt that there will be a very positive ROI on our overall objectives.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planview IdeaPlace Screenshots

Screenshot of View IdeasScreenshot of Crowd PredictionsScreenshot of Pairwise Idea Ranking & VotingScreenshot of New Ideation ChallengeScreenshot of Idea DetailsScreenshot of Challenge Overview