Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment | Score6.2 out of 10 | N/A | The PI Behavioral Assessment™ is a simple yet effective assessment that is broken down into four primary behavioral factors, or core drives. These core drives and their relation to each other create a behavioral pattern that provides a framework for understanding the workplace behaviors of candidates and employees. According to the vendor, the results allow users to better predict workplace behaviors and motivating needs. The PI Behavioral Assessment™ is a… | N/A |
| Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Human Resources Specialist in Human Resources at Franciscan Health (Human Resources, 10,001+ employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment Other assessments provide more than two questions [in] order to determine our candidate's skills. I do believe [some] variety might help Predictive Index Behaviour Assessment determine more accurate results since candidates would have to answer more questions about their … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Office Manager in Human Resources at JumBurrito (Restaurants, 51-200 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment I have not used any other product like PIBA Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info HR admin/Recruiter in Human Resources at Onsite Safety, Inc. (Construction, 51-200 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment N/A Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info HR/Payroll Administrator in Human Resources at Onsite Safety (Construction, 51-200 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment In my years as an HR admin, I have not tried any other programs like this one. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Human Resources Manager in Human Resources at County National Bank (Banking, 51-200 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment Many years ago, I utilized Personalysis and it tended to put people into one of 4 main color groups. It also helped with knowing how to communicate with others. I like PI because there are so many Behavioral Profiles. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Retail Operations Manager in Sales at Suburban Volvo of Troy (Automotive, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment This is the only tool we use Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Director Talent & Organization Development in Corporate at Kirlin (Construction, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment I have used MBTI, Strengthsfinder, Disc, Kolbe among others. I find they all have their place. PI was already in use at my company when I joined. However, as I became certified and used it more, I have found it very effective. The reports have just the right amount of … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info HR Generalist/Recruiter in Human Resources at Gateway Plastics, Inc. (Consumer Goods, 501-1000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment PI is way better - the Wonderlic is very limited in what information it can provide you with a candidate. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Talent Coordinator in Human Resources at Benco Dental (Hospital & Health Care, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment I have not utilized any other products like PI Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Director Of Training at ConvergentUSA (Financial Services, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment PI is a much simpler profile to manage and is clearly about behavior instead of personality. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment I have only used PI. We assessed Culture Index recently to see if there were additional factors that would be helpful, however found it to be poorly worded and with significantly fewer resources for education, training and overall use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Continuous Improvement Engineering in Engineering at Vickers Engineering, Inc. (Automotive, 51-200 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment [We selected PI Behavioral Assessment because we] Can tailor it to positions. Provides clear data. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Hub Director, Inside Sales Europe in Sales at Qlik (Computer Software, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment PI is simple to use, in a short time scale but provides startling insight into the individual. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Talent Management Officer in Human Resources at MainSource Bank (Banking, 501-1000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment The only other type of Behavioral Assessment I've used is the Strengths Finder and I don't know that I'd say it's anything like PI. It still gives us great information about a persons strengths but PI tells us more about a persons motivations. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Human Resources Manager in Human Resources at Stockmeier Urethanes USA, Inc. (Chemicals, 51-200 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment DISC is similar but really only focuses on the employee in a business setting. The PI Behavioral Assessment looks at the employee as a person as well as an employee. It is not how you respond to a question but what attributes you have. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Regional Recruiter in Human Resources at Meritage Homes (Construction, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment I haven't used any other assessments in the past, so I don't have anything to compare to...unfortunately. I think the PI is probably the strongest assessment out there, and most accurate. It's used worldwide, and has scientific backing to prove its validity. If I were to … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Talent & Leadership Development Manager in Human Resources at Wrist Ship Supply (Maritime, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment DISC, Thomas Int, PROFILOR Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Human Resources Director in Human Resources at Murfin Drilling Company, Inc. (Oil & Energy, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment The other assessments that we examined felt more like an SAT exam than a recruitment tool. The results were difficult for our managers to read through and understand. There were a lot of words, with very little actually being said. The PI was succinct and precise. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info VP of Human Resources in Human Resources at Claremont Savings Bank (Banking, 51-200 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment From 2011-2016 we used DiSC and PI Behavioral Assessment together. We found DiSC to be more employee friendly, meaning employees don't need to be trainined administrators to understand their own report. However, our DiSC trained employee has left, and we opted to stick with … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info HR Director in Human Resources at Formstack (Internet, 51-200 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment We haven't used any other assessments to compare against it. We've been in love with PI since we started. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment We also use a Bartell Assessment for managers. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Organization Development in Human Resources at Vistra Energy, formerly Energy Future Holdings (Utilities, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment We use multiple assessments for a variety of reasons. This one is the most versatile that we have. Others we use either for individual development or team development, but PI is the only one we use for Recruiting, individual development and team development. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Human Resources Director in Human Resources at Florida State Fair Authority (Facilities Services, 501-1000 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment We evaluated a number of alternatives. Most of them were cost prohibitive because they wanted to charge us per survey. We have a very seasonal workforce so that cost model was not going to work for us. With PI we have a fixed cost each year. Easy to budget... no guessing or … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info HR Coordinator & Executive Administrator in Human Resources at Viessmann Manufacturing Company (U.S.) Inc. (Renewables & Environment, 11-50 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment Most of the other assessments in the marketplace are lengthy and complicated. The PI Behavioral Assessment is so user-friendly that many job applicants have told me they prefer it over other assessments they have taken. The other great thing about the PI assessment is that it … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Head of Commercial in Sales at Digicel Anguilla GSM & FIBRE (Telecommunications, 51-200 employees) Chose Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment PI is more explanatory and much more effective than the others. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce Analytics |
|
| Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 (63 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.2 (1 ratings) |
| Usability | 8.8 (9 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 7.5 (8 ratings) |