| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Printfection | Score9.6 out of 10 | N/A | Printfection is a swag management platform that aims to simplify the buying, managing, and distribution of swag and branded merchandise, from the company of the same name in Denver. They offer a suite of online swag management tools and APIs alongside custom printing, inventory management, and distribution. The vendor states their customers use the platform to drive more leads, reward customers, and engage employees. | N/A |
 Sendoso | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | Sendoso is a gift sending platform designed to support B2B sales and ABM, and provide a sales accelerant. | N/A |
| Printfection | Sendoso | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Printfection | Sendoso | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Printfection Sendoso is great, but I feel more supported by Printfection. Quicker response rates. They always follow up instead of me having to follow up with them. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Printfection There were a couple of reasons we selected Printfection: price and contract/level of commitment (we are on a month-to-month plan). To be honest, there are products that integrate better with Salesforce and have more capabilities but we were looking for something that didn't … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Printfection I'm not in charge of which one we use. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Sendoso Sendoso has stronger integrations into the marketing tech stack. Sendoso has access to digital gift cards. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Printfection | Sendoso | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | 9.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.2 | 6.8 |
| Usability | 7.4 | 9.6 |
| Availability | 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | 7.6 |
| In-Person Training | 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Online Training | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Configurability | 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 8.3 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Product Scalability | 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Professional Services | 7.7 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 8.3 | 8.2 |
