Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro vs. Procore

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro	Score8.3 out of 10	N/A	Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.	$480 per user/per year
Procore	Score8.8 out of 10	N/A	Procore is a project management software designed specifically for the construction industry. Procore is cloud-based and allows unlimited users per instance, so that construction team members and stakeholders can all access project information and documents.	N/A

Procore charges an upfront annual fee by product and based upon Annual Construction Volume (ACV) - the aggregate dollar value of the construction work across the customer's projects. Procore contracts include access for unlimited users, customer support, unlimited data storage, and product enhancements, at no additional cost. Multi-year pools: Contract volume is set for the entire multi-year term and can be consumed at any time during that period to help smooth out variability in consumption. Volume opt-in: Up-front contractual pricing is put in place for additional volume that might need to be added mid-term, to increase predictability of costs. Renewal rate protection: Up-front setting of rates is locked now, so businesses can budget accordingly for future renewals and improve cost predictability in future years.

Pricing Info

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro	Procore
Considered Both Products	Autodesk Laura Samoisette High Performance Division Project Manager in Professional Services at Resilient Buildings Group, Inc. (Renewables & Environment, 11-50 employees) Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro BIM360 compared to Prolog is comparing apples and oranges. We used these programs to do things the other could not. We used Prolog to handle bids, budget and change orders. While BIM360 we thought was not set up to easily do those options so we used BIM for drawings, … Incentivized Helpful? christian Maxwell Project Engineer at Okland Construction (Construction, 501-1000 employees) Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro I think BIM360 has much better quality control tools that are much more streamlined than what is available on Procore. However the RFI, Submittal, Drawings tools in Procore are much easier to use and the drawings are much easier to access and view in the field using Procore. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro They are all very similar. It seems that Bim360 is easier to manage from the front end, which results in a better experience for all of the end users. Incentivized Helpful? Hung Lam Vu Ngo BIM Lead in Engineering at COFICO - Construction Joint Stock Company No. 1 (Construction, 201-500 employees) Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro Bim360 is a CDE in the overall BIM softwares from Autodesk. If you are using Revit, Navisworks or Building design suite from Autodesk, it's highly recommended that Bim360 be the CDE of choice to get your project into BIM technology. Incentivized Helpful?	Procore Technologies Verified User Chose Procore We came from ProLog, and the biggest thing here is collaboration. Whether it is from the field or external, ProLog had zero collaboration options. Our strongest contender when choosing Procore was Bim 360 (or Autodesk Cloud), we in the end decided this product wasn't fully … Incentivized Helpful? Laura Samoisette, LEED AP, WELL AP High Performance Division Project Manager in Professional Services at Resilient Buildings Group, Inc. (Renewables & Environment, 11-50 employees) Chose Procore Autodesk Bim 360 is lesser than Procore in my opinion. That's because it is less commonly used and team members need to understand the product before they can jump into action. Almost all of our projects use Procore, which makes it easy for me to search for projects all in on … Incentivized Helpful? Silvana Diaz Procore Systems and Quality Management Coordinator in Quality Assurance at Entreprise de constructionTEQ inc (Construction, 51-200 employees) Chose Procore Bulk edition able Customized reports are better that Procore's The tools flexibility Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Procore Overall the best single-platform solution right now, but it comes at a high price. Main reason for selecting back in 2016 was integration with accounting/ERP. While Procore has done well improving the product overall, some specific pain points persist and really frustrate … Incentivized Helpful? Lori Ford Project Management Assistant at SSOE - STEVENS & WILKINSON SC INC (Computer Software, 51-200 employees) Chose Procore Much easier to use. Because I learned Procore first, it set a good foundation of what I should be looking for as I hunt and peck to navigate other program management software. Incentivized Helpful? Alexander Jakstys, PE, LEED AP, WELL AP Design Manager in Engineering at Walbridge (Construction, 201-500 employees) Chose Procore We first utilized Procore because it was mandated by the Owner. However, after using it for a few years, I've found that it's my preferred platform. It works just as well (if not better!) than the other programs that I've used. It's typically more user-friendly. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Procore Procore tools are more manageable, customizable, and robust. The licensing scheme is better for us since it provides unlimited users. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Procore I have used BIM 360 Field to track quality, safety, and BIM issues. I have found Procore to be more reliable and efficient than Procore. The mobile app is also a big improvement. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Procore Honestly, Procore is the most user-friendly software program out of the ones I have previously or currently use. With other products, it can be hard to find where everything is, and it ends up taking longer to learn all the things you can do with them. Incentivized Helpful? Matthew Allan Project Manager at Bird Construction (Construction, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Procore Both have their advantages but Procore is better for 2D management. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Procore We've just started using BIM 360 for VDC Coordination only. As we get further into BIM 360, unsure if it will go any further than that. Incentivized Helpful? Che Odom Marketing and Business Administrator in Marketing at Rabren General Contractors, Inc. (Construction, 51-200 employees) Chose Procore Procore is easier to use than the competition. It is built for intuitive use and not needing a lot of training for end users. It does all of the things it promises to do, including accounting, but doesn't seem to be an accounting software tweaked for project management. Their … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Procore Bim 360 field is great for tracking field issues and equipment installation. However, Autodesk is very behind on document and cost control. They either don’t have it integrated or are just very behind. Procore has everything combined. Procore’s punch list tool is not as good as … Incentivized Helpful? Rob Clifton Vice President in Corporate at SD Clifton Construction Inc. (Construction, 11-50 employees) Chose Procore Procore takes all of these programs and combines them into 1. It is very user-friendly and allows subs to see what the contractor wants them to see and nothing more. These other programs have their individual strengths but having all of them together on one platform that has … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Procore I've used PlanGrid and BIM 360. I think Procore is the best overall tool. It handles all project management aspects at an above average level whereas other programs have higher highs and lower lows. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Procore Procore seems to be the best option for us. It isn't everything we need, but compared to other platforms it did more and had more value. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Procore Bim360 as a standalone is not as robust as Procore. Drawings/ document maintenance is a great example. To get a similar result to Procore's drawing management, you would need to use "Bim360 Field", which would have a similar OCR text recognition feature to Procore, but its … Incentivized Helpful? Andy Kang Director of IT and Business Development in Information Technology at Cal-City Construction, Inc. (Construction, 11-50 employees) Chose Procore We compared Procore to Bim360 and chose Procore for its ease of use and feature set. We are not using BIM so comparing the project management features of Procore to Bim360 was the main factor. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Procore Bluebeam has a much better mark up and viewing abilities for drawings and submittals and Bim360 has a much better Punch List tool. Other than that Procore does a lot more overall than both of these programs. Incentivized Helpful? Andrew Braun Project Engineer at The Beck Group (Construction, 501-1000 employees) Chose Procore procore is a great combination of Bim360 and CMiC. It takes the functions from CMiC and the user friendliness from Bim and combines them into one product. Incentivized Helpful? Christopher Jamieson Assistant Superintendent in Quality Assurance at Lee Kennedy Co., Inc. (Construction, 201-500 employees) Chose Procore Procore pretty much takes all great features of the two other programs and brings them all into one platform. Incentivized Helpful? Ryan Stokes Assistant Project Manager in Corporate at Lee Kennedy Co., Inc. (Construction, 51-200 employees) Chose Procore Procore has certainly set the standard for the current demands in the industry for both large and small outfits. Incentivized Helpful? Tony Grasso Project Engineer in Product Management at Mortenson (Construction, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Procore Procore has a simple user interface similar to PlanGrid but the capabilities of Procore are far more apparent for the price. PlanGrid was our 'go-to' for punchlists and ease-of-use in the field. Procore has tools that are much broader for our company. The submittal and RFI's … Incentivized Helpful? Aaron Williams Assistant Project Manager at Shiel Sexton (Construction, 201-500 employees) Chose Procore Better collaborative platform. Incentivized Helpful? Ben Carlson Field Engineer at The Jamar Company (Construction, 201-500 employees) Chose Procore For use in the field, PlanGrid is far better. Far easy to mark up a drawing, measure, and send a snapshot via email. I prefer Bim360 for punch list tracking as well. You can easily make reports, and only select certain trades or areas. Procore is still the best on a desktop or … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

Features

Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro

Procore

Comparison of Asset Management features of Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro and Procore
Feature	Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro 6.0 1 Ratings	Procore - Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets	6.01 Ratings	00 Ratings

Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro and Procore
Feature	Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro 6.2 4 Ratings	Procore 7.9 186 Ratings
Dashboards	4.34 Ratings	7.9173 Ratings
Standard reports	6.34 Ratings	8.2178 Ratings
Custom reports	7.14 Ratings	7.8173 Ratings
Data exportability	7.14 Ratings	7.8166 Ratings

Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro and Procore
Feature	Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro 6.8 13 Ratings	Procore 8.6 749 Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing	9.913 Ratings	9.0719 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing	10.013 Ratings	8.7692 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists	8.212 Ratings	8.9672 Ratings
Photo documentation	5.312 Ratings	8.7722 Ratings
Jobsite reports	4.411 Ratings	8.5684 Ratings
Document sharing	10.012 Ratings	8.8739 Ratings
RFI tools	4.311 Ratings	8.9701 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals	9.812 Ratings	8.5679 Ratings
As-built drawings	4.410 Ratings	8.3119 Ratings
Mobile app	3.011 Ratings	7.9694 Ratings
Submittal design and management	6.310 Ratings	8.4202 Ratings
Checklists	4.44 Ratings	00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes	9.02 Ratings	8.2190 Ratings
Specifications	5.34 Ratings	9.0199 Ratings
Change orders	8.02 Ratings	8.4164 Ratings

Comparison of Estimating features of Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro and Procore
Feature	Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro 4.3 3 Ratings	Procore 8.4 107 Ratings
Takeoff tools	4.43 Ratings	10.04 Ratings
Job costing	3.53 Ratings	7.594 Ratings
Cost databases	8.02 Ratings	8.14 Ratings
Cost calculator	2.53 Ratings	9.04 Ratings
Bid creation	3.02 Ratings	7.5101 Ratings

Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro and Procore
Feature	Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro - Ratings	Procore 8.0 55 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)	00 Ratings	8.055 Ratings

Comparison of Payroll Management features of Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro and Procore
Feature	Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro - Ratings	Procore 8.2 51 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors	00 Ratings	8.251 Ratings

User Ratings
	Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro	Procore
Likelihood to Recommend	9.9 (13 ratings)	8.8 (855 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (68 ratings)
Usability	10.0 (1 ratings)	9.8 (55 ratings)
Availability	- (0 ratings)	9.9 (15 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	9.5 (15 ratings)
Support Rating	6.9 (2 ratings)	9.2 (68 ratings)
In-Person Training	- (0 ratings)	8.1 (5 ratings)
Online Training	- (0 ratings)	9.3 (13 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.8 (113 ratings)
Configurability	- (0 ratings)	9.3 (15 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (310 ratings)
Product Scalability	- (0 ratings)	9.8 (15 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	- (0 ratings)	9.9 (13 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	- (0 ratings)	9.8 (14 ratings)

Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro vs. Procore

Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro

Procore

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons