Prokuria vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure

Zip Intake-to-Procure

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Prokuria	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Prokuria is a cloud-based procurement platform, presented as easy to customize, fast-to-start and intuitive with a simple interface to drive greater adoption across departments. RFIs, RFPs, RFQs Streamline sourcing decisions with Prokuria's technology - digitized data and features such as: Sealed Bids, Message Center, Supplier Engagement Monitoring, Internal Collaboration, Smart Alerts & Reminders,…	$20 user/month
Zip Intake-to-Procure	Score 7.9 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.	N/A

Pricing

Prokuria

Zip Intake-to-Procure

Editions & Modules

Basic Plan: $20
user/month
Standard Plan: $60
user/month
White-labeling Add-on: $120
independently of the number of users
DocuSign integration Add-on: $120
independently of the number of users
Set-up Purchase Request Flow Add-on: $120
independently of the number of users
Set-up Purchase Orders Flow Add-on: $120
independently of the number of users
Premium Plan: $180
user/month
Enterprise Plan: Price on request
API integrations Add-on: Price on request
Custom developments Add-on: Price on request

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Prokuria	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

$15 per user per month

No setup fee

Additional Details

Basic Plan includes: - Suppliers directory - Supplier segmentation - Supplier scorecard - Contracts Repository - Items catalog - Custom fields - 25 GB Storage Standard Plan includes Everything in Basic, plus: - RFIs & RFPs & RFQs - Update Data Campaigns - Live messaging with suppliers - Projects - Suppliers onboarding form - Supplier surveys - Automated workflows - 25 GB Storage - max 50 suppliers in an event Premium Plan includes Everything in Standard, plus: - Public sourcing events - Reverse & Forward Auction - Dutch Auction - Advanced Allocation Auctions - Advanced fields & form logic - Advanced workflows - 100 GB Storage - max 100 suppliers in an event Enterprise Plan includes everything you need to roll out a sourcing platform at scale perfectly matching your procedures and process. All plans are billed quarterly. Free Trial available - No credit card required!

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Prokuria	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Considered Both Products	Prokuria No answer on this topic	Zip Intake-to-Procure Nick Huffman Category Manager Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level … Incentivized Helpful? Francene Bernal Procurement Specialist Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Zip Intake-to-Procure focuses on streamlined data collection and form submissions while Coupa is primarily a comprehensive spend management platform. Zip Intake-to-Procure simplifies data gathering and Coupa is more for broader financial management solutions. Zip … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure There are more reporting insights and better data visualization summaries in Zip Intake-to-Procure vs. Coupa (from when I last used it in 2022). Zip Intake-to-Procure also feels a bit fresher and has a better UI experience than Coupa. The user experience is pretty … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure ZIP had much better UI and had Okta integration, Tipalti had neither. Incentivized Helpful? Chanie Wiesenberg Director of Finance at Gong.io Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Coupa and Airbase Incentivized Helpful? BB Bill Browning Director of Procurement Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Zip is by far the easiest to implement and configure, dramatically reducing the speed to value. Setup and creation of workflows to align with approval processes can be done within weeks and there is no limit to the number of approval flows that can be created. There are value … Incentivized Helpful? EZ emily zhang Sr Manager, Procurement Operations Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Zip created the best end-to-end solution vs the other solutions we reviewed. The user interface is easy and simple for first-time users to navigate. The user adoption was quick due to the visible approval chain. The Zip support team is top-notch and compared to the competitors, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure We selected Zip Intake-to-Procure to solve vendor onboarding, vendor-related purchasing, and compliance issues. Incentivized Helpful? Ross Sharp Head Of Procurement Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure We haven’t really used another service like Zip before. Generally, we use Netsuite. Incentivized Helpful? Carey Beth Kirkland Procurement Specialist Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure We haven’t really used another service like Zip before. Generally, we use Netsuite. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Zip Intake-to-Procure has a easy to use tool with the ability to make changes as our organization evolves whereas the other tools require more time or technical support to make changes. Zip Intake-to-Procure has more of a buy side focus than DocuSign CLM Zip Intake-to-Procure has … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Venminder and Tipalti Approve Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure We truly haven’t found other products like Zip. Incentivized Helpful? MS Manali Shah Sr. Accounting Specialist Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Zip absolutely wins when it comes to complex purchases and flexible workflows. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure Truth be told, we haven’t seen any other similar products. The alternative was manually tracking in Google Sheets, ticketing systems, and in NetSuite. Coupa was probably the closest in terms of what we were looking for but they were not willing to fit it to our needs like Zip … Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Prokuria	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Small Businesses	MIP Fund Accounting Score 8.7 out of 10	MIP Fund Accounting Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Precoro Score 2.8 out of 10	Precoro Score 2.8 out of 10
Enterprises	SAP S/4HANA Cloud Score 8.6 out of 10	SAP S/4HANA Cloud Score 8.6 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Prokuria	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.7 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Prokuria	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	Zip is a newer product in the P2P space, and as such there are still some areas for improvement. They don't have all the "bells and whistles" products and configurations that some of the other players in this space have, but the products they do offer are best in class. Zip is an ideal tool for tactical procurement. Incentivized Nick Huffman Category Manager Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org. Visibility to the user in a great user interface Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool Chanie Wiesenberg Director of Finance at Gong.io Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Missing the ability to proxy as another user. Currently, if one approver did not set up their delegation, an admin or the approver of that step must reassign each of the approvals to another person. Bulk upload options for admins to update queues and subqueues. Missing ability to schedule reports or the option to share a saved view with another user. It would be easier if certain filtered views can be shared with others to avoid each user having to create their own views. Incentivized EZ emily zhang Sr Manager, Procurement Operations Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Incredibly responsive and helpful. Incentivized SH Shana Hawkins Procurement Specialist Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Truth be told, we haven’t seen any other similar products. The alternative was manually tracking in Google Sheets, ticketing systems, and in NetSuite. Coupa was probably the closest in terms of what we were looking for but they were not willing to fit it to our needs like Zip was able to. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Zip Intake-to-Procure has helped clean up forecasting for us - we've improved accuracy by over 30% since now we're forcing folks to make sure spend is captured accurately and checking submitted PO amounts against the bottoms up forecast We've also been able to leverage the SLA insights provided by Zip Intake-to-Procure to increase operational efficiencies. We're identified orgs that are slowing down the overall approval process and putting more pressure with shorter SLA times. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Prokuria Screenshots	Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots