Fin by Intercom vs. Pypestream

Pypestream

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Fin by Intercom	Score 8.5 out of 10	N/A	Fin is Intercom’s AI Agent for customer service, designed to deliver high-quality answers, even for complex queries. It works with any helpdesk, or it can be paired with Intercom’s next-generation Helpdesk to get the full Intercom Customer Service Suite.	$0.99 one-time fee per 1 resolution
Pypestream	Score 7.0 out of 10	N/A	Founded in 2015, Pypestream created the Customer Engagement Center (CEC), a conversational AI solution where the core product, the Customer Engagement Center (CEC), is an all-in-one, cloud-based suite of 12 components designed to transform any business into a fully automated digital brand. With headquarters in New York, Pypestream has a customer base that includes Shell, Chase, Procter & Gamble, Google, Sling, and HBO Max. Pypestream provides customer engagement in several key industries,…	N/A

Pricing

Fin by Intercom

Pypestream

Editions & Modules

Fin with your current helpdesk: $0.99
one-time fee per 1 resolution
Copilot add-on: $35
per month per user
The Early Stage program: $65
per month (6 support seats)
Proactive Support Plus add-on: $99
per month
Fin with Intercom’s Helpdesk: from $39 + $0.99 per Fin resolution
per month per seat

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Fin by Intercom	Pypestream
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Fin comes with a 90-day money-back guarantee. Here's how it works: Use Fin in at least 250 conversations within the first 90 days after trial. If you're not satisfied, you can request a refund of up to $1M. Refund requests must be submitted within 90 days of starting the subscription.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Fin by Intercom	Pypestream
Considered Both Products	Fin by Intercom Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom We're using another AI agent too. Fin AI is a little behind, as it needs to start learning from either testing or real conversations, so it can better advise users with accurate information - whereas the other AI agent is learning very fast and needs little to no adjustment of … Incentivized Helpful? SO Scott Olinger Application Support Analyst Chose Fin by Intercom I did not choose which platform our support teams used. But I did not like NetSuite because it sent out a lot of email updates and required the client to reply to the correct email in order to have everything tracked. ServiceNow was pretty similar. The reports in ServiceNow … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom HubSpot CRM, HubSpot Marketing Hub and Zendesk Suite Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom I used Zendesk briefly but found it difficult to navigate — I often couldn’t tell what was going on or how to simply reply to a ticket. In contrast, Intercom is much more intuitive and user-friendly. Its clean interface and support for multiple communication formats like … Incentivized Helpful? Lorrayne Soares Líder de Produtos Chose Fin by Intercom As explained previously, most of these platforms were focused on tickets, most reports only work with tickets, there is no way to postpone a service without turning it into a ticket, and since our response time target is a maximum of 2 minutes, these platforms were unable to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom Sprinklr Social, Zendesk Sunshine Conversations, Clarabridge (discontinued), Engagor (discontinued) and Qualtrics XM for Customer Frontlines Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom Honestly, we haven't really looked at this, but we do use it for another team because a third-party works with it. Otherwise, I am extremely happy with Intercom and have not looked towards another software. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom It was a long debate before we switched from Crisp to Intercom, but we never regretted that decision. Intercom looks and looks sleeker, works smoother, and has the knowledge base feature, which was our main need to switch. The transition took very little time, so no bumps on … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom Way better than all of them - especially the workflow tool which I don't think Help Scout or Crisp even had. Really easy to manage capacity too through snoozing conversations and customers receiving emails after a response. With HubSpot, there was no way for our users to return … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom Dialpad Support, Talkdesk and SnapEngage Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom This is the first one we tried. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom My main concern at the moment is how the integration looks to the users and Intercom just looks modern and up-to-date. HubSpot is missing this. In the background it always comes down to how you organize your team and processes. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom Odoo was, in my opinion, terrible - a jack of all trades and master of none, which is why all teams in the business moved away to bespoke software. Freshdesk - an easier and more organisable way of creating and managing tickets. Although Intercom now has tickets, we're still … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom At the moment, I only use Supademo to record screen tours. It is very intuitive, has a browser extension, and is perfect for recording the onboarding of new features. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom Intercom as a tool is well suited to manage our key metrics with the help of its reports. We have evaluated a lot of tools but Intercom remains the best in terms of report. It helps us maintain OKR's for the support team and track whenever needed. FinAI also has the reporting … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom Personally I have not used any other platforms like Intercom and do not wish to search as of right now. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom The intercom is more intuitive and provides easier management and personalization of our conversations. It's been a while since I used Zendesk, so this might have changed, but Intercom provides a bigger catalog of functionality targeted to product marketing, such as emails, … Incentivized Helpful? Barry Pepper VP of Customer Experience Chose Fin by Intercom Noone has been able to standup to the level of service and product that Intercom gives us. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom To compete with Salesforce, the main point is the pricing. Intercom has a very different budget when it comes to start ups and up and coming companies, which helps. To compete with other platforms, Intercom has a more developed interface and a super completa arrange of tools, … Incentivized Helpful? Ray Zwankhuizen Product Manager Chose Fin by Intercom No idea, see above. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom Several factors as pricing, customisation, ease of use, popularity, user-friendly and the continuous online support as well improvements helped us make this choice. Onboarding new colleagues to Intercom does not even take one day, it is so efficient and intuitive. If the … Incentivized Helpful? Agne Caunt Head of Customer Success Chose Fin by Intercom Intercom is much more flexible and modern than Zendesk, UI is better. Zendesk is better at multiple brand experience and localisation. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom All tools that we used in the past, have a lot of problems on the chat app, our the syncing data between integrations, Intercom has too, but is very less than others. Incentivized Helpful? Samuel Linge Senior Sales Associate Chose Fin by Intercom Intercom has more polish. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Fin by Intercom We used Aircall for many years and it was a great tool, however as we scaled down our phone support usage it became expensive and cumbersome. Intercom phones offered a cheaper solution that turned out to be more efficient for our team to use as well. Incentivized Helpful?	Pypestream Verified User Anonymous Chose Pypestream In comparison to Microsoft Bot Framework or now Azure AI service structure, where Pypestream is better suited is in those organizations who want to truly have a partner in development. Pypestream allows the flexibility for your Dev teams to do it themselves, or to be in a … Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Fin by Intercom	Pypestream
Small Businesses	LocaliQ Score 9.0 out of 10	Simplify360 Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Piper the AI SDR by Qualified Score 9.2 out of 10	Dialpad Support Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	Conversica Score 9.9 out of 10	Verint Community Score 9.9 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Fin by Intercom	Pypestream
Likelihood to Recommend	8.3 (0 ratings)	7.0 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	8.8 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Availability	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	5.7 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Online Training	7.4 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	6.6 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Fin by Intercom	Pypestream
Likelihood to Recommend	While Fin is an awesome investment, the setup and tuning of responses to meet brand alignment and delivery have taken some time. If you prioritize not just resolution rate and accuracy, but style and delivery, it's a bigger lift. However, for the vast majority of businesses, the step and its impact on resource management are a worthy investment. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Pypestream is suited for standard chatbot and conversational flows versus more multi-departmental scenarios. They do very well with guided flow bot services which are great for agent bots within a contact center, but less so for those implementations that have a large document management implementation for FAQs. They do well with service integrations; however, at times troubleshooting edge cases that are impacting performance and adoption can take a while to remedy. I want to believe that better monitoring tools on the platform side would alleviate this for them. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Great UI - everyone has their own inbox but can still see all incoming messages. Fin AI - we love the AI functionality, it saves tons of time of the team. Automated emails - we configured Intercom in a way that it uses a lot of information we have about our users (e.g. their subscription, date of upgrade, etc.) so that we can use it to automate communication. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Native live agent platform Managed services for service creation and maintenance Custom analytics Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Some things are repetitive. Ex: If you provide guidance to ask a follow-up question, it'll ask that follow-up question each time. It'd be cool to have a "vibe" check for auto-sorting. Ex: We have responses to our outreach feed into Intercom. It'd be cool to have a way to auto-sort based on if they ask a detailed question or just a plain "interested" response. It'd be cool if Fin by Intercom flagged conversations, like it a customer seemed agitated, for the team to review. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Generative AI - Large Language Model Support Standardized Reporting Custom UI Support Developer Tools Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	It's currently a perfect fit for our needs, and we are customer-focused and small. When we grow, we may need to re-evaluate, but our current team finds it easy. Reviewing conversations is simple and allows for great training. The canned replies make service fast and easy. Smart suggestions remove the need to re-write technical walkthroughs and explanations for our FAQ Incentivized Ariana Thompson Support Operations Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	It takes a bit of getting used to. It's easy to start off with simple pieces of answering queries, etc. The real part is when one tries to use workflows with triggers and automation. Then, it can be a whole different experience. I would love to see it being much simpler in terms of usability there. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability	always there Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Performance	works perfect Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Intercom is the premier customer support/engagement model and it definitely has one of the top tier customer support teams as well. I don't think I have ever waited more than 5 minutes to get the information I need or get help with an issue. They are incredible and I aim to model our customer service department after them. Incentivized LW Lukas Washack Operations Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Online Training	Easy to know the learning path Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating	The implementation was surprisingly easy but we are having to adapt from our old process to work well with Intercom. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	In my experience, what Intercom has done with Fin by Intercom is far more innovative and forward thinking than other tools I've used. It's intuitive, easy, and they are always releasing new things to make Fin by Intercom even more powerful. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	In comparison to Microsoft Bot Framework or now Azure AI service structure, where Pypestream is better suited is in those organizations who want to truly have a partner in development. Pypestream allows the flexibility for your Dev teams to do it themselves, or to be in a managed service where you provide requirements and information and they build and allow you to test and give approvals. They are more willing to work directly with you versus a Microsoft where you will eventually get pushed off to a 3rd party partner to help with advanced implementations. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	I like how I don't feel like I need to constantly be monitoring support, especially on weekends It's great that the user will get some response right away, I just need to hope that the response they do get is good enough if I'm awk Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Enabled the contact center business lane to grow a chat agent support channel that has a 2 to 1 (customer to agent) support ratio Provides an alternate channel for training, marketing information, and data services which help grow our business and support different value streams Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Fin by Intercom Screenshots