QAComplete is a performance testing tool from SmartBear. The vendor says QAComplete was built from the ground-up to be an easy-to-use test case management tool, adapting to the user's existing processes and empowering users to manage all of their manual and automated tests with ease, while reporting on all test results in one central location. The vendor's goal is for QAComplete to allows users to spend less time managing tests and focus on what they do best; making great…
N/A
Visual Studio Test Professional
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Visual Studio Test Professional is a performance testing solution.
We had used FogBugz and Freshdesk for quite some time. I hadn't been exposed to QAComplete until recently during a project with one of our clients, but we are already starting to see the superior benefits of this product. Once you wrap your head around the interface and …
When using Azure Devops, it only has a basic test plan while using the extension, and it is better suited if you only use Azure Devops, but VS test professional provides comprehended test execution and management as most of the developers and testers use Visual Studio to …
The visual Studio Test tool is faster than other tools. Since the development and testing processes are in one tool, it is more profitable in terms of cost. It is more inconvenient to write a test case in DevOps.
Visual Studio Test Pro is well ahead of the competition due to its integrations and consolidation of tools and capabilities in one place. It offers the entire life cycle capabilities for development, testing, and deployment. The cloud offering with Azure integration makes it …
The reason for choosing this product was because it works compatibly with the Microsoft product family. In addition, the widespread availability of corporate Technical Support Services also allows you to solve your problems in a shorter time. According to the open source test …
Visual Studio Test Professional is a significantly better program than JMeter because although they are both quality programs, the integration of Visual Studio Test Professional with Visual Studio allows for easier user experience. Further, as we already use Visual Studio to …
Eclipse is great for Linux users, and it's considered more "lightweight" (less memory usage) in comparison to the "heavier" Visual Studio (more memory usage). Eclipse has a great auto-finish capability used when writing code. OutSystems is great to use when writing for mobile …
Our dev team is used to developing with Microsoft tools and managing projects with Azure devops server and service. QA uses the same collaborative platform, so it was easier - almost natural - for all of them to use Visual Studio Test Professional, with full integration and …
Visual Studio Test Professional is head and shoulders above the other options we've tested and used in the past. Our Legacy teams were still using Quality Center as of a month ago and they just switched over to Microsoft Test Professional to join the rest of the organization …
I believe the thing that makes Visual Studio a solid choice is the integration with Azure and Microsoft. Apart from that, there are several open-source software available which pretty much do the same on the same scale as well.
We did not evaluate other options. This solution was released while we were using third-party tools, and once that happened we knew that we had to use it because of the integration.
Visual Studio IDE has a lot of test functions to developers. The Enterprise Version allows installation of full test manager features. It is best if you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement. Visual Studio Team System or Microsoft TFS incorporate a lot of test management …
Test Professional is a much more rounded product by nature of its integration with Team foundation server. Much lower administrative effort required as only one system needs to be hosted.
Being in college I have used a lot of less developed software. Visual Studios offers a wider variety of tools that helps find where the problems in our software are along with editing options that make these changes less painful and way easier to accomplish. Before we used two …
Visual Studio Test Professional is best for .NET and C# based development, which is what 90% of our developers and projects do. It is an integral part of the CI/CD pipeline for our custom made Enterprise resource planning tool. It also works very well with Azure providing seamless integration to way more functionality.
I gave QAComplete this rating because though I do feel that it is a powerful tool, it's definitely not designed for the everyday user. Obviously the target demographic is QA specialists who should be team members that are very technical and methodical in their approaches. However, for the rest of the team, it can often time prove difficult to navigate. Also, the UI is in need of a serious refresh.
Visual Studio Test Professional's overall usability is extremely high quality. It is extremely functional and like all Microsoft products has a user interface that is well designed and is extremely user friendly. Any functionality which I looked for, I was able to either understand immediately or find a user guide online.
I have not had to work with their customer service directly yet. Our client has been utilizing this tool for years, so I would assume that the support they have received would be good enough to keep them wanting to continue to use the product.
My team has always been able to troubleshoot with the help of customer support (and even schedule a virtual meeting!) in a timely manner. The support is provided immediately and with the necessary knowledge to answer/solve any questions/problems I or my team experience.
We had used FogBugz and Freshdesk for quite some time. I hadn't been exposed to QAComplete until recently during a project with one of our clients, but we are already starting to see the superior benefits of this product. Once you wrap your head around the interface and navigate to the bug reports, it becomes a very powerful tool.
When using Azure Devops, it only has a basic test plan while using the extension, and it is better suited if you only use Azure Devops, but VS test professional provides comprehended test execution and management as most of the developers and testers use Visual Studio to develop their apps and publish their builds.
From our side, it's been very easy to pick up on bugs reported by our clients. It's a great ROI for the cost as they are fairly minimal in comparison to other QA software.
I think a negative impact can be the administration of QA items. It definitely feels a bit bogged down.
My last negative would be that I don't believe it syncs in any way with the Atlassian software suite. I could be wrong on this but manual entry from system to system can be daunting at times.
Visual Studio Test professional fits right in with the other Microsoft Lifecycle Management tools.
End to end, Development, Test, Deployment and Delivery assures the pipeline is continuous. Visual Studio Test Professional is an integral part of that pipeline.
Familiarity with Microsoft Tools makes usability intuitive, makes it easy to ramp up our Testers.