QAD Adaptive ERP vs. Viewpoint Spectrum

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum is a cloud-based construction ERP suite with project management, accounting, resource management, and reporting and analytics. Key features include workflow automation and collaboration tools, document imaging and sharing, cost estimating tools, and RFI management tools.N/A
Pricing
QAD Adaptive ERPViewpoint Spectrum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
QAD Adaptive ERPViewpoint Spectrum
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsProspective buyers may contact vendor directly for a price quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
QAD Adaptive ERPViewpoint Spectrum
Considered Both Products
QAD Adaptive ERP
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points …
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
JDEdwards and now venturing into SAP
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
The cost benefit, it is cheap to maintain and adjust than the other ERP
Chose QAD Adaptive ERP
I have used JD Edwards and Syteline.

JD Edwards is very expensive in terms of licensing cost , maintenance. QAD is very cheap.
Viewpoint Spectrum
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
The cloud-based system is great, and the ease of use compared to other systems is why we chose it.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Viewpoint Spectrum allows us to have one platform to do payroll, invoice for projects, and manage the cost of a project. Whereas Procore didn't have those features and we were using multiple other platforms to do all of those things.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum, when compared to Simply accounting, is better. It has more options, and it is easy to navigate. Spectrum meets our needs better. Spectrum, when compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate, is better. Spectrum has better connectivity between its project …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Not sure how comparable these software are. Both are great and were used for different reasons for different companies and circumstances. I use Viewpoint Spectrum for the Roadway Contruction industry and SAP for the chemical manufacturing world. There are similarities but a lot …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum is much more comprehensive than its competitors, and provides a much deeper level of insight into project costing. From bidding to project closeout, Spectrum's software allows for cohesiveness and fluidity where other programs are very segmented and difficult to track.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Quickbooks Enterprise is much easier to use with a lot of the same more advanced features. From my experience, I wouldn't recommend Viewpoint Spectrum
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Viewpoint is much more user friendly than Sage 300, but is more limited (less customizable). It is not easy to get custom reports out of Viewpoint, whereas Sage is perfect for customization. With that comes more attention to detail in Sage, from all users, to avoid erroneous …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum is the only one I have used since starting here 2 years ago.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Viewpoint Spectrum is much more construction based.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I originally came off of the American Contractor when it reached its end of life, and my company converted to using Spectrum. American Contractor didn't give us half the visibility that Spectrum does - we still had to rely heavily on outside systems and processes to gain a full …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Prior to acquisition by Viewpoint and then Trimble, the customer support was a major selling point of the software. Unfortunately at this time, that is no longer the case.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Foundation has some nice features that Spectrum doesn't and vice versa. Procore is much more complicated to use but it has better company wide reporting. I think Viewpoint will be a better choice in the long term. They are rolling out updates all the time. The cost is …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
This is my first construction job and Spectrum is the only software I've used. The company used to use Sage
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum seems to be a better option for now since current leadership is comfortable with the financial aspect that Spectrum bring but some in the leadership team are not happy with the other offers that Trimble has.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
On my old accounting software one feature I miss is the feature where I could run a GL detail report and actually click on a line to see the actual entry.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
We selected Viewpoint Spectrum because it allowed us to run our construction and projects department along with our service department all in one application. We are into year five with Viewpoint Spectrum and are still very pleased with our decision.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I have only evaluated the products. I chose Spectrum because it was (at the time) relatively inexpensive or on par with the others and seemed like the best option that fits our business model. It has not proven to be very costly for what we are getting in my opinion and nothing …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Have not previously utilized any construction software. Our company has been on Viewpoint Spectrum for over 10 years.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I wasn't part of the evaluation, but I did give input on what I thought of Viewpoint Spectrum before we bought it. I had used Timberline and Sage, before we got to Spectrum.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum is an ERP system that was built with construction in mind. It has more applicability vs. Dynamics, which is used across many types of companies.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I investigated Sage, Timberline, ConMast, and Quickbooks some 25 years ago. Viewpoint Spectrum was the best overall in most coverage and flexibility, ease of use, and mastery. I do not have any knowledge on other software currently.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
We stayed with Spectrum for what we thought would be an easy upgrade and transition. However, we are evaluating how we are going to use ViewpointOne Teams because we've suffered many roadblocks to daily use like daily logs and uploading of photos using the app. Also, choosing …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
We originally had Jonas Premier prior to Viewpoint based on cost and flexibility (report writing). However, we discovered that Jonas reports are not available as described in the demo. And reports were not easy to read because they had to be created. It was challenging to …
Features
QAD Adaptive ERPViewpoint Spectrum
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
33% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.0
Ratings
36% below category average
Pay calculation10.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Benefit plan administration10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files10.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.3
Ratings
36% below category average
API for custom integration9.90 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Plug-ins10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability10.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Role-based user permissions10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
32% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
3.6
Ratings
67% below category average
Dashboards10.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Standard reports10.00 Ratings3.30 Ratings
Custom reports10.00 Ratings2.50 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
Accounts payable10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.3
Ratings
16% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Inventory tracking10.00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Automatic reordering8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Location management9.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Pricing8.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Order entry9.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Credit card processing9.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Cost of goods sold10.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Order Orchestration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.2
Ratings
22% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Production Process Design9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
Ratings
15% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Forecasting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.1
Ratings
8% above category average
Billing Management00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.7
Ratings
3% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
12% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
QAD Adaptive ERPViewpoint Spectrum
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERPViewpoint Spectrum
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
QAD Adaptive ERPViewpoint Spectrum
Likelihood to Recommend
Suited very well for small to medium sized organizations as it provides you everything you can expect from an ERP (without any fancy bells and whistles that SAP and some of the other ERPs provide). Works well with a lean IT organization, as the configuration and ongoing maintenance and/or analysis is pretty straightforward.
Read full review
Viewpoint Spectrum would be fine for small to medium-sized companies. It would be great for transitioning from an in-house paper-based process, especially since it's designed with small construction companies in mind. They're making it even easier for smaller companies by offering additional features that you'd normally have to find in other products. However, companies can easily outgrow this system. We have about 15 years of data in the system, over 300 active jobs, and nearly 1,500 employees. In the past 3 years we've noticed slower performance and frequent locks in the system that require intervention from a system administrator. We moved to the cloud about 2 years ago and this has made troubleshooting even more difficult as we don't have the same access that we did before to resolve performance issues.
Read full review
Pros
  • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
  • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
  • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
Read full review
  • Dashboards make navigating to the crucial information quick and easy.
  • The layout with what we affectionately call the job info bar helps our project teams to quickly get where they need to go in the system.
  • Crystal reports are easily managed and integrated with Spectrum, giving us great flexibility in custom reports.
  • With a little training, and I mean a little, Spectrum is user friendly. Easy to create favorites/shortcuts for ease of use.
Read full review
Cons
  • As a user and who managed the application, I have longed for a module that you don't have to go thru the entire frame to go to a certain field. They have addressed this issue on their recent release by going to a web frame.
Read full review
  • Subcontract Kiosk can be glitchy - allows subs to overbill on subcontract billing items
  • Document Imaging can be glitchy - often says users do not have adequate security to view/add documents, but they do - if they sign out and back in, it works fine
  • At times, support can be lacking - sometimes case responses are delayed or you get an incorrect answer
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
Read full review
It checks all of our boxes at the moment.
Read full review
Usability
Easy to use, zero or minimum cost to maintain the database (DBA etc) , no issue with OS ( Linux), stable database
Read full review
Some things in Spectrum are NOT that intuitive, but I think knowledge of the software just comes with time. There are still some things I need assistance with in Spectrum but I'm very comfortable with my day to day items now that I've been using it for years. However, if there is something I don't do often or haven't done before, I don't find the software to be that intuitive, I actually find the logic on some things to be a little weird but it's fine once I know how to do it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Very little down time. They host our system.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
For the most part the product is very reliable. Since we are hosted we sometimes have connectivity issues but I would say that is more our ISP than Spectrum.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The support has recently changed. Last year, you could call in and get an immediate response. Now that doesn't seem possible unless you have an urgent situation with access to the software, payroll or payables. I have found that using chat or e-mail works nicely for the most part, but sometimes I feel it would be easier if someone from support would jump on our site and take a first-hand look rather than going back and forth
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Our trainer was excellent and navigated the time zone differences expertly. She gave us test assignments to complete and was available for questions at any time.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It is important to have a strong implementation partner. It made the transition from our old system to the new system easier.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
Read full review
Spectrum, when compared to Simply accounting, is better. It has more options, and it is easy to navigate. Spectrum meets our needs better. Spectrum, when compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate, is better. Spectrum has better connectivity between its project management system compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate. Spectrum, when compared to CMIC, I believe they are equal. CMiC has a better project management system, but Spectrum has an easier accounting system to navigate.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
You can grant user specific access which is nice. Project managers do not need all the same modules as Accounting. But Accounting does need access to PM modules as well
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • ROI - very high with QAD.
  • Yearly maintenance cost is very low.
  • Support is very good from the QAD customer service team, knowledge base web site.
  • Very quick to implement the system.
Read full review
  • Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us the opportunity to be proactive in analyzing the costs for a project in time to make a difference in the outcome of the project. It has allowed us defense in supporting our communications with the project owners.
  • Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us to become more productive with its accounting software and the cohesion between the modules. It has definitely streamlined the processing necessary to account for the business.
Read full review
ScreenShots