Qlik Replicate

Qlik Replicate

48 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Qlik Replicate	Score8.4 out of 10	N/A	Qlik Replicate enables organizations to accelerate data real-time replication, ingestion and streaming via change data capture, across a wide range of heterogeneous databases, data warehouses and data lake platforms.	N/A

Pricing

Qlik Replicate

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Qlik Replicate
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes

Required

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Qlik Replicate
Considered Both Products	Qlik Bindu Bhargava Reddy Chintam Data Engineer in Information Technology at Inxite Out (Computer Software, 201-500 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate I found this as my lifesaver in terms of its efficacy and approachable to scale the streaming data from our ecommerce platform and analytics of data made much easier than compared to others. As it's partners with azure and other platforms which made our applications faster to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate Qlik Replicate is fast and easy. ADF can do a wider variety of things Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate Qlik Replicate was very cost-effective and easy to use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate Qlik gave better perfoamnce Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate For different data bases source and target support, transformations, scalability, speed Incentivized Helpful? Edward Rips Senior Lead Engineer in Information Technology at Interstate Batteries (Automotive, 501-1000 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate None Incentivized Helpful? Doug Thomas Senior Big Data Developer in Engineering at Pearson (E-Learning, 10,001+ employees) Chose Qlik Replicate We tried to use Oracle GoldenGate for our Oracle source replication needs but, had too many issues with a number of our tables due to churn or size. Qlik Replicate had no issues. And, we can tune our tasks to not impact the source systems we are pulling from. Incentivized Helpful? Rajesh Chauhan Director -Enterprise Architect and Technology Strategist in Information Technology at Interstate Batteries Inc (Wholesale, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate Great tool for data replication solution for Oracle/SQLServers/etc. Real easy to get it set up and start realizing business value. Getting the PoC accomplished in a short window. Product costing and easy to start small and scale as needed. It helped cover most of our ask … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate Qlik Replicate / Attunity was able to be put on our server behind our firewall where with Fivetran would have required. Fivetran would also have required a different SQL server CDC setup. HVR was just as powerful if not more but was more costly and the user interface was not … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate Qlik Replicate was more manageable, very intuitive and easy to understand than the other products like Striim. The learning curve is less with Qlik Replicate and the connectors for various sources was easier to plug and play. Incentivized Helpful? Reid DeWolfe Vice President of Database Development in Engineering at NGP VAN (Information Technology & Services, 501-1000 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate The biggest advantage of Replicate in comparison to Fivetran is that we can run the application on-prem. This allows us to configure it precisely how we desire, avoid opening additional ports in our firewall, and monitor its resource consumption directly. That level of … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate We replaced IBM’s Change Data Delivery software (Change Data capture specifically for Netezza) because it had a bad user interface, it was difficult to set up, and it was very hard to troubleshoot errors. We selected Qlik Replicate (then called Attunity CDC) because it has a … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate We have not evaluated any other products in the last 3 years. Incentivized Helpful? Janusz Jarocki Senior Data Engineer in Information Technology at Transamerica (Financial Services, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate Attunity: Easy interface, relatively easy monitoring, zos support, budget friendly. we choose Attunity. At the same time we use AWS DMS for DB2, sqlserver -> aws services replications (cheaper). However because AWS DMS does not support db2 zos we use Attunity for db2 zos … Incentivized Helpful? Bhanuchander Kaviti Business Intelligence Engineer in Information Technology at Itech Us (Information Technology & Services, 201-500 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate Ease of use Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate Far less complex to manage Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate Simple to do one-to-one copy and very reliable, as other tools a little complex in setting up the pipelines and scheduling parts. Very simple to connect to the SFTP locations and easy to download them as well. Incentivized Helpful? Daniel Dagnachew Systems and Applications Administrator in Information Technology at Medifast (Health, Wellness and Fitness, 501-1000 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate You need to have expertise knowledge to design and develop data using visual studio. But you can design a data flow with minimum experience. In addition to that QLIK has a better performance. It enables you to replicate a large volume of data with minimum latency. The … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate We helped attunity (prior owners if replicate) build out new features and worked through bugs with them. Their product was not great when we originally started but there were no other solutions in the market except for Golden Gate which had a hefty price tag associated with it. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Qlik Replicate SSIS lacks real time replication and the only place where it can beat SSIS. Additionally, has more end point connectors than SSIS, Incentivized Helpful? Jeff Huelskamp IT Manager - Application Development and Business Intelligence in Information Technology at Dolese Bros. Co. (Mining & Metals, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate Both of these work with API's and services, Qlik Replicate does not. Incentivized Helpful? John Fontanna Senior Database Administrator in Information Technology at Cambria USA (Building Materials, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate We're still evaluating, but so far Replicate is easier to set up than HVR. I'm not involved with the Fivetran evaluation. Incentivized Helpful? Darin Coulter Senior Analytics Manager at AFNI, INC. (Outsourcing/Offshoring, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate Qlik Replicate's power is in its simple 1:1 copying of database tables and architecture and maintaining a near real-time copy of that database. Talend and SSIS are different tools and more for custom ETL's that require various steps to connect to SFTP or download files. … Incentivized Helpful? SANJAY KUMAR Data Architect in Information Technology at Healthchoice of Arizona (Hospital & Health Care, 201-500 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate We tried MIMIX, SQL SSIS and Veeam but our team found Qlik Replicate had an advantage over all these three in terms of speed, UI, and ease of maintenance. Incentivized Helpful? David Fisher Sr. Technical Services Manager / Infrastructure Team in Information Technology at Interstate Batteries (Retail, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Qlik Replicate I have not evaluated any other competing products. Qlik Replicate was the first product we selected for the data lake three years ago, and we have stayed with it ever since. Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Qlik Replicate
Likelihood to Recommend	8.6 (35 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	7.2 (3 ratings)
Usability	8.3 (32 ratings)
Support Rating	7.2 (3 ratings)
Implementation Rating	7.2 (3 ratings)