QlikView vs. Cyfe, by Traject

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
QlikView
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
QlikView® is Qlik®’s original BI offering designed primarily for shared business intelligence reports and data visualizations. It offers guided exploration and discovery, collaborative analytics for sharing insight, and agile development and deployment.N/A
Cyfe
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Cyfe is all-in-one dashboard software for analyzing data from online services like Google Analytics, Salesforce, AdSense, MailChimp, Amazon, Facebook, etc, from Traject.
$29
per month
Pricing
QlikViewCyfe, by Traject
Editions & Modules
QlikView
Custom
per user
Starter
$29
per month
Standard
$39
per month
Pro
$65
per month
Premier
$119
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
QlikViewCyfe
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsOn an perpetual license basis, based on server plus number of users. Contact vendor for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
QlikViewCyfe, by Traject
Considered Both Products
QlikView
Chose QlikView
We use Qlik Sense to feed QlikView reports.
Chose QlikView
QlikView, Tableau, and SiSense are all very good BI tools for analysis and reporting. Tableau was better at intuitively matching fields of disparate data and more visually appealing, but I think QlikView is faster. Tableau was also easier for someone to use to build and …
Chose QlikView
The price and functionality of QlikView best suit the needs of our organization.
Chose QlikView
I think it all comes down to personal preference and integration compatibility with the existing systems in the organization. However, I would argue that Qlik and PowerBI are the top-tier available solutions due to robust features and capabilities, and I would put solutions …
Chose QlikView
With QlikView and Qlik Sense the users can answer their own questions more interactively. They also can build their own visualizations without waiting [for] someone from IT to create a new report. The users can navigate through the data finding out relevant information. Through …
Chose QlikView
We have not necessarily used any direct competitors to QlikView, but we have used other analysis and reporting software that has worked better for us because of the type of data that we are analyzing. There are also cheaper options out there that are definitely better.
Chose QlikView
When integrating the tool years ago, we looked at other options including the out of the box reporting features from our current ERP software, The user interface and report-ability was very difficult to use and scale across may different business models in our group. We also …
Chose QlikView
Each tool has their own pros and cons; QlikView works well for our needs at this time.
Chose QlikView
QlikView was a customer requirement, so we did not evaluate any other product with these functionalities. It was the only option presented to us.
Chose QlikView
There are more than 1700 partners in the world that could implement a QlikView solution, and these associates tend to have a long and close relationship with the customer, and ultimately lead up to understanding the customer's needs at 100%. Also, the software is very scalable …
Chose QlikView
MS Power BI and other BI tools have similar functions to QlikView and some of them also have much cheaper price. However, the strength of QlikView is that it is much easier to use and to learn. If you need to train a new person to learn the tool, it costs around 1-2 days.
Chose QlikView
QlikView has its own data warehouse, which is the most important reason why would I choose QlikView over any other tools. Apart from that, the feature options are good for the ones who know the tool well but created a steeper learning curve in the beginning. Once you went …
Chose QlikView
Qlik was less intuitive than Paxata, but less expensive than either MicroStrategy or PowerBI. Qlik has enough breadth to accommodate most use cases without breaking the bank.
Chose QlikView
It is inexpensive and cost prohibited software. Has alot of canned reports that you would need and doesn't request much development work. Widely adopted as an industry leader and works well with many of the top data source applications. Very easy to use and intuitive in the …
Chose QlikView
We use it as a part of our Office 365 tool. With that tool, we do not have an option to download the reports and send them to customers, but with Qlikview we can.
Chose QlikView
Other BI and reporting tools have some of the same capability but the actual UI and ease of use were not there when we compared.
Chose QlikView
QlikView is cost-efficient and has a free desktop version to try out the different functions of it before you make the purchase decision.
Chose QlikView
QlikView is very similar to Tableau. However, I believe it is a cheaper solution, and that is why our company has chosen QlikView. It has been able to handle large, large amounts of data sets, and has been pretty agile for our business needs.
Chose QlikView
My use of Cognos was as an embedded BI tool inside of a cloud HCM. At the time, you could not marry up data from other external sources with that version. QlikView makes it easy to connect data from multiple sources. As a BI tool I do prefer the Cognos set up, but that's more …
Chose QlikView
QlikView was already chosen and implemented before I started [to work here], but it is very easy to learn (for me) and I started to solve problems within a day or two.
Chose QlikView
While I may have to export the data, I was doing so anyway to get it into excel to drive better visualizations of the data. When I discovered PowerBI and all it had available I no longer had a need for QlikView.
Chose QlikView
The first thing we liked about QlikView was the price. For a small amount per user, I can have a very useful software to manage the whole data set our company uses. The Tableau desktop has very high pricing for the software, and for just one user, not the whole organization. …
Chose QlikView
It's easier to learn than Pentaho.
Chose QlikView
Qlikview is more outdated compared to Qlik Sense. Qlik Sense puts more of the power onto the users to create their own dashboards while QlikView tends to be managed by BI teams.
Cyfe
Chose Cyfe
Klipfolio probably had a lot of cool features, but it was SO user-UNfriendly that we never got to use them. We had high enough turnover in our company that people always needed Klipfolio training, and it was rarely completed to the satisfaction of trainees or trainers. It was …
Chose Cyfe
These other reporting tools are much better for an agency that is under the scrutiny of cleaner reports with more in-depth analytics and specific KPI's. However, you can use both and provide a Cyfe board as a live additional to the weekly static reporting that many agencies …
Chose Cyfe
Sprout has better reporting for social analytics but doesn't cover as many activities across a company and the reports are only for social...not even web analytics. It's also way more expensive. We're actually evaluating whether or not Cyfe will continue to be our tool of …
Chose Cyfe
My company already subscribed to Cyfe when I began, so for me there wasn't any shopping around. While Cyfe does pull straight from the "back end" side of many social media platforms, or from Google Analytics for websites, the benefit is that you can see all the stats in one …
Chose Cyfe
Cyfe is cheaper than Geckoboard; and I believe (??) has more integrations you can pull data from. I liked Geckoboard a tad better visually.
Chose Cyfe
We used RavenTools in the past as our monthly reporting tool. At the time there wasn't a one-page dashboard available in RavenTools, every single element we incorporate in our reports was included on a separate page. It became very unwieldy for our clients and led to a lot of …
Chose Cyfe
Compared to other tools like Jasper Reports, Cyfe has ZERO impact on the server since it is a totally hosted solution, plus it has several connectors that allow for interacting with no coding at all. It gives the user total freedom on which language to use to provide custom …
Chose Cyfe
We were using different tools to do pieces of what Cyfe does. I was never keen on the idea of spending $150, $200, or even $500+ for an analytics tool so we were pulling analytics directly from each source and creating our own reports. It was a beast of a project to manage and …
Chose Cyfe
Cyfe more than holds its own vs the competition. The capabilities are strong - especially for the price.
Chose Cyfe
Hootsuite is good for tracking online activity. Cyfe has the same capabilities and more.
Chose Cyfe
Remember that Cyfe is not a true Business Intelligence tool it is a data visualization tool. It is great because it let's you change the time series. It will not let you drill down on the data. You cannot map different data sets together. It is a great tool to pull basic data …
Chose Cyfe
Cyfe really shines by pulling in only the relevant data you want to see while being logged in to multiple accounts.
Chose Cyfe
The price was a big selling point but more importantly the third-party integrations that are offered were the deciding factor. Offering support for services that we use regularly like Google Analytics, Apple's iTunes Connect, Facebook, etc., allow us to get real time access to …
Chose Cyfe
I investigated a number of options for a digital dashboard, to be honest Cyfe was so much cheaper than the alternatives I was a bit sceptical, but it was so much better once I had mastered adding data sources.
Chose Cyfe
The Salesforce dashboard is comparably flexible and intuitive, but designed more to its internal CRM focus. SumAll shares the social media dashboard capabilities, but lacks all others. Its interesting feature is side-by-side graph analysis for cross-channel performance. Cyfe …
Chose Cyfe
Cyfe's pricing model makes it affordable for a small company like mine.
Chose Cyfe
Yet to find a comparative product that can offer the same pricing, service and capabilities
Chose Cyfe
Have not tried other products.
Chose Cyfe
Domo was vastly overpriced compared Cyfe and it was far less friendly to use and get used to. I was able to jump right in with Cyfe and get the data I wanted setup right away. When I had a question I was able to get an immediate response directly from Deven without hesitation. …
Features
QlikViewCyfe, by Traject
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
QlikView
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
6.9
Ratings
17% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.10 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates8.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
QlikView
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Cyfe, by Traject
8.5
Ratings
5% above category average
Drill-down analysis9.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
QlikView
7.9
Ratings
5% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
9.2
Ratings
10% above category average
Publish to Web8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Report Versioning7.50 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
QlikView
7.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
8.9
Ratings
11% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.50 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
QlikView
8.3
Ratings
2% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
8.6
Ratings
1% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)8.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model8.00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
QlikView
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Cyfe, by Traject
9.3
Ratings
17% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Mobile Application9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
QlikView
-
Ratings
Cyfe, by Traject
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
REST API00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
QlikViewCyfe, by Traject
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 9.1 out of 10
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Score 9.9 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
QlikViewCyfe, by Traject
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
3.3
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
QlikViewCyfe, by Traject
Likelihood to Recommend
Sales data validations have helped manage our justifications in the past, especially with regard to new product development and new business introduction. It has also been helpful in identifying trends with business impact and direction specific to quarter and monthly sales from ERP data as well as decisions to purchase equipment of staffing based on run rates and product demand.
One thing that can get out of hand is data output - if you aren't careful in your query, you may be overloaded with data dumps and drown in the amount of info you have to filter through. This is a user caution, not a comment on the software itself.
Read full review
Cyfe might be for you if you are looking for a cost-effective way to display all of your marketing metrics in one place. If you are looking for a detailed, fine-tuned, niche, or extremely specific metrics, this might not be the best solution. Cyfe is good for a general health check-up of marketing, but not a finely tuned examination.
Read full review
Pros
  • QlikView has a simple, relational data model that's REALLY fast. Filtering and changing data is dead simple results are almost immediately available.
  • The free version of Qlikview is almost completely featured, so you roll a pro-level product out to an entire department for really cheap.
  • QlikView is really flexible--if you can imagine it, you can build it.
Read full review
  • Cyfe makes it easy to create a professional looking dashboards in a short amount of time. With so many built-in data sources and the intuitive nature of the interface, you can have beautiful looking charts and graphs in no time!
  • One of the best features of Cyfe is the many data sources built-in and that each dashboard is not constrained to one source. One of the drawbacks I've seen in other tools is the limited ability to pull from multiple Google Analytics profiles, multiple AdWords accounts or from both AdWords and Bing in one dashboard. Cyfe has no such limitation.
  • Google Spreadsheets - if the data you need to show is not available via an API, being able to pull from Google spreadsheets is a great solution. Once set up, you can add data whenever you need to the spreadsheet and your widgets in the Cyfe dashboard are automatically updated. Huge time saver!
Read full review
Cons
  • We found that QlikView can be a bit slow in supporting some forms of encryption. It is web-based and we needed to upgrade all of our server to not support the older SSL and TLS 1 protocols, only support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. However, QlikView could not run with TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. We had to wait over six months to get a version that would handle the newer TLS versions.
  • There are so many options with QlikView that you can get lost when developing a visualization. There are still items I have not yet figured out, such as labeling a graph with the name of a selected detail item.
  • QlikView works by pulling the data it is going to use for visualization into its database. I am a security reviewer and I need to make certain that PII and PHI is not pulled by QlikView for a visualization, otherwise this could become a reportable indecent.
Read full review
  • Sometimes the percentages in Cyfe seem off. We'll review the numbers month over month in Google Analytics and the same numbers are pulled into Cyfe, and yet Cyfe reports a different percentage
  • It would be nice if Cyfe had more styling and layout choices to brand it more to our company's style and look
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Ease of use, ability to load from pretty much any data source. today I created an application that loaded time sheets from excel that are not in a table format. With Qlik's "enable transformation steps" I was able to automate loads of multiple spreadsheets and multiple tabs easily. Could not do that with any other tool.
Read full review
It has become a part of our internal tools so unless a competitor comes out with similar functionality as a similar price point it is unlikely that we would not renew. One area that would cause us not to renew would be if a competing service came out with more third-party integrations that match our needs. Price at this point is no longer an issue as it would allow us to automate a somewhat manual process that we have now connecting Cyfe widgets to Google Sheets.
Read full review
Usability
I do think there is a steep learning curve to the program and that it requires a high level of experience or a data scientist background to fully take advantage and implement dashboards, and users will require ongoing training to maximize ROI, but it is absolutely worth it considering the impact it can make on an organization.
Read full review
I gave it a rating of 7 because it does a good job at what it does, but there are missing that are missing which I would have benefited from. For instance, if I was able to drill down more on the specific metrics I was able to see, that would have been helpful.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
QlikView server is very stable, with minimal errors and rare outages.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
The scripting option gives me options to connect to different databases with ease
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The documentation presented by QlikView is very clear and exact. This makes the process of implementation more easy. If any questions arise while creating the reports it is very easy to access the QlikView documents through the internet. QlikView also has a Qlik Community, full of different questions and answers. This helps a lot to resolve issues even without contacting the support team.
Read full review
Because I had a very minor question and I was able to speak directly to the founder through LinkedIn and through email. I know that as they grow this may not always be an option but the fact that he made himself available to answer my questions said a lot about his passion for the product.
Read full review
In-Person Training
My team attended, but I cannot myself rate, but I think it was good as they've successfully launched a training program at our company themselves for users. It was 3-4 day training.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Training was as expected. The demo environments tend to be more fully featured that our own environment, but the training was clear and well delivered.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It has taken some time to get used to Qlikview and the backend team behind it. From understanding the new regulations on using less images and also pushing for more tools (such as full compatibility on desktop, laptop, ipad, phone). We were given training on this and have helpful tips to find analytics behind Qlikview but it is very much also a learn as you implement system.
Read full review
Cyfe is a 15 minutes implementation, then some time to get your data sources created. This is an easy one person job that will not result in down time or unnecessary wasted man hours.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
With QlikView and Qlik Sense the users can answer their own questions more interactively. They also can build their own visualizations without waiting [for] someone from IT to create a new report. The users can navigate through the data finding out relevant information. Through QlikView color code, users can get aware of the relationship between the different data points.
Read full review
My company already subscribed to Cyfe when I began, so for me there wasn't any shopping around. While Cyfe does pull straight from the "back end" side of many social media platforms, or from Google Analytics for websites, the benefit is that you can see all the stats in one place rather than having to log in to so many other platforms to grab those metrics.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Speed to market is the really big thing. You can attach to multiple data sources quickly and build a consumable model for a dashboard. It doesn’t require IT talent to build. We have built more dashboards and added more users in the last year, then in our entire history. I was at a company of 30k+ employees before, and we didn't have near this level of BI adoption.
  • As a result, we are seeing benefits across business function. For example, within sales, our pipeline has much more visibility. It allows for much faster decisions on things like quotas. One of our biggest power users is in sales ops. She feels her dashboards load 10x faster than our previous tool and she can make changes on the fly.
Read full review
  • Cyfe allows us to provide real time data to our clients
  • Cyfe allows us to provide detailed analytics to our clients showing actual results
  • Cyfe reduced our need to provide monthly "reports" to our marketing clients
  • Cyfe allows us to have better situational awareness and know what is going on throughout our multiple organizations
Read full review
ScreenShots

QlikView Screenshots

Screenshot of QlikView Sales DashboardScreenshot of QlikView on all devicesScreenshot of QlikView using mobile touch screen