RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

42 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
RabbitMQ	Score7.7 out of 10	N/A	RabbitMQ, an open source message broker, is part of Pivotal Software, a VMware company acquired in 2019, and supports message queue, multiple messaging protocols, and more. RabbitMQ is available open source, however VMware also offers a range of commercial services for RabbitMQ; these are available as part of the Pivotal App Suite.	N/A

Pricing

RabbitMQ

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
RabbitMQ
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	RabbitMQ
Considered Both Products	Open Source Gordon Lo Digital Solutions Architect in Information Technology at Dynacare (Hospital & Health Care, 1001-5000 employees) Chose RabbitMQ RabbitMQ has a few advantages over Azure Service Bus 1) RMQ handles substantially larger files - ASB tops out at 100MB, we use RabbitMQfor files over 200MB 2) RabbitMQ can be easily setup on prem - Azure Service Bus is cloud only Incentivized Helpful? Rajdeep Bhuva Lead Engineer in Information Technology at TJC Group (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose RabbitMQ It is very easy to use as it has a simple function to connect and use RabbitMQ. It is having Fast Learning curve, Any newbies can learn it in a week or month. It is having proper documentation, we are able to find all the details about its functionality and usage of it. The … Incentivized Helpful? Paul Wickham Lead Consultant in Information Technology at Magenic Technologies (Computer Software, 10,001+ employees) Chose RabbitMQ I have not used other products other than a roll-your-own solution. The Selection of RabbitMQ was made before I began working on the project but I was able to leverage it well without making major changes to the existing apps. This was particularly helpful in lowering risks. I … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose RabbitMQ RabbitMQ cannot resend messages like Apache Kafka but it seems to have the lowest latency in messages. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose RabbitMQ For basic use cases, SQS is way easy to deploy and maintain compared to RabbitMQ. RabbitMQ can cover a lot more use-cases but actually, we did not face specific scenarios that make it necessary to come back to RabbitMQ. Incentivized Helpful? David Bonet Montes Co-Chief Executive Officer in Engineering at Couragium Solutions (Information Services, 11-50 employees) Chose RabbitMQ It is just better documented and seems a better fit given that is done using erlang. PubSub+ low level approach seems unsafe. They work with custom hardware whereas Pivotal RabbitMQ seem a better fit for generic hardware (cloud). Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose RabbitMQ Oracle Weblogic JMX system. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose RabbitMQ Honestly, though we're still trying out Kafka and Pulsar, I'd go with them for message broker and as traffic buffers. We are only still using RabbitMQ because it's hard to transition off after writing tons of code custom-built for RabbitMQ. Kafka is better because it's way more … Incentivized Helpful? Christopher Maggiulli Enterprise Software Architect in Research & Development at Latham Pool Products Inc (Building Materials, 1001-5000 employees) Chose RabbitMQ None of the options in the list are really similar products. We use Apache Camel in conjunction with RabbitMQ and we also use Oracle Integration Cloud and WSO2 for messaging. Integration Cloud is SaaS-based and low code, so it's drastically different in that regard. WS02 is … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	RabbitMQ
Likelihood to Recommend	9.9 (11 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	6.5 (4 ratings)