TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

RavenDB vs. TeraText Database System (DBS)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    RavenDB

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ARavenDB is a NoSQL Document Database that is fully transactional (ACID) across the database and throughout clusters. The database minimizes the need for third party addons, tools, or support to boost developer productivity and get projects into production fast. Users can setup and secure a data cluster deploy in the cloud, on-premise or in a hybrid environment. RavenDB offers a Database as a Service solution, allowing users to pass on all…N/A

    TeraText Database System (DBS)

    Score4 out of 10
    N/ALeidos offers the TeraText Database System (DBS), a database for managing a large amount of documents and text or xml files.N/A
    Pricing
    RavenDBTeraText Database System (DBS)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    RavenDBTeraText Database System (DBS)
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    RavenDBTeraText Database System (DBS)
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of RavenDB and TeraText Database System (DBS)
    Feature
    RavenDB
    9.1
    24 Ratings
    TeraText Database System (DBS)
    -
    Ratings
    Performance9.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability8.923 Ratings00 Ratings
    Concurrency8.023 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security9.223 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability9.623 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data model flexibility9.924 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility9.423 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    RavenDBTeraText Database System (DBS)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (24 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.5
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.2
    (20 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.1
    (21 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)