Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. SolarWinds Server Configuration Manager (SCM)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Ansible | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it. | $5,000 per year |
 SolarWinds Server Configuration Manager (SCM) | N/A | N/A | SCM is designed to help detection of a server, application, or database configuration change quickly. If the server is down or performing poorly, the change data collected by SCM allows users to see if an application or server configuration change was the source of a performance issue or outage. •Alert and report deviations from the baseline in near real-time •See who’s making configuration changes on servers or applications •Compare current… | N/A |
| Ansible | SolarWinds Server Configuration Manager (SCM) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Ansible | SolarWinds Server Configuration Manager (SCM) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ansible | SolarWinds Server Configuration Manager (SCM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.5 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 | - |
| Usability | 7.3 | - |
| Performance | 8.7 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.3 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.2 | - |
| Ease of integration | 8.6 | - |