TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. Skeddly

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Ansible

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AThe Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.

    $5,000

    per year

    Skeddly

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ASkeddly is an automated automated scheduling service for Amazon Web Services. Skeddly, provides a managed service for managing the AWS stack.N/A
    Pricing
    AnsibleSkeddly
    Editions & Modules
    Basic Tower
    5,000
    per year
    Enterprise Tower
    10,000
    per year
    Premium Tower
    14,000
    per year
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AnsibleSkeddly
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    AnsibleSkeddly
    Configuration Management
    Comparison of Configuration Management features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Skeddly
    Feature
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    8.6
    44 Ratings
    Skeddly
    -
    Ratings
    Infrastructure Automation9.244 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Provisioning8.841 Ratings00 Ratings
    Parallel Execution8.840 Ratings00 Ratings
    Node Management8.432 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Logging7.841 Ratings00 Ratings
    Version Control8.738 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    AnsibleSkeddly
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (108 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.7
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.6
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)