Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. TIBCO ActiveSpaces

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
TIBCO ActiveSpaces
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
ActiveSpaces from TIBCO supports an application infrastructure.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat JBoss EAPTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Considered Both Products
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP
We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP
WebSphere Application Server is propriety and increases project cost. It is slightly complicated to learn when compared to Jboss EAP. These were the two main reasons why we chose Red Hat JBoss EAP over Websphere Application Server.
Also, JBoss EAP is light weight and requires …
Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP
We decided to use Red Hat JBoss EAP as it lowers our overall cost, supports all the features that we are looking for including clustering, distributed caching and web services.
JBoss EAP is modular and has cloud-ready architecture.
Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP
JBoss does practically everything Apache Tomcat and Weblogic does in terms of our requirements, but JBoss is more suited for larger enterprise J2EE apps compared to Tomcat. Boot time is not as quick as Tomcat, but still relatively fast for our deployments. The system can also …
Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP
Pricing is great and very easy to use
Chose Red Hat JBoss EAP
Jboss supports JEE standards and provides features like high availability, clustering, hot deployments, configurable features. you can quickly add or remove needed features and cut jboss footprint and reduce boot time.
TIBCO ActiveSpaces
Chose TIBCO ActiveSpaces
Before using TIBCO ActiveSpaces, we were storing all the data in Oracle database and due to large volumes of data response time was more and overall performance had reduced. With the introduction of TIBCO ActiveSpaces, we moved the master data to TIBCO ActiveSpaces for storing …
Chose TIBCO ActiveSpaces
Actually, we are gradually replacing the Tibco ActiveSpaces with Redis (for caching purpose only) or Hazelcast (for embedded mode and also for in-memory distributed computation purpose + in-memory distributed IPC purpose).
Chose TIBCO ActiveSpaces
One biggest advantage of the Tibco ActiveSpaces is it's ease of integration with the TIBCO suite of products. Hence it is more suitable to TIBCO AS in conjunction with the TIBCO suite of products.

All products could offer the same or different level of advantages. For the …
Features
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
TIBCO ActiveSpaces
-
Ratings
IDE support8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is well suited for deploying high transaction Java EE based applications. It supports many popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
TIBCO ActiveSpaces is only suited in the company where Tibco suites have been already used, the license cost is not a concern, it is only required for data caching purposes and only works in the client/server mode for middle-sizes of data. If the expectation is data cache + distributed computation or embedded IMDG is also one requirement or the data cluster needs span multiple data centers, other light-weight OpenSource IMDG solutions should be considered
Read full review
Pros
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
  • Easy to scale
  • Support for many hardware and software platforms
  • Easy to implement
Read full review
Cons
  • Jboss CLI is a great tool but we had trouble using it to get values that are displayed on Jboss GUI. It also has limitations parsing the applications.xml files and we had to use a mix of jboss-cli and linux bash commands to automate certain application administrative tasks.
  • JBoss doesn't really provides performance tuning recommendations. It would have been nice if it could learn from the current demand vs current settings for things like connection pool, server configurations, garbage collection etc.
Read full review
  • TIBCO ActiveSpaces Tuple-based data structure is not flexible enough to support customized native data objects.
  • There is no secondary index option.
  • Doesn't provide "predicate based In-Grid distributed search and result aggregation."
  • only can be used as data cache, the node's only contribute memory but can not use the data partition owner node's computation power to apply the distributed computation customized by the user.
  • Cross data center replication (geographically) is a pain.
  • Encounter the performance issue when the data volume is huge, even according to the architecture design, linear scaling up should not have that issue.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
TIBCO ActiveSpaces is easy to install and integrate with other product suites. It is easy to understand and implement as well. TIBCO ActiveSpaces supports multiple databases for storing the data(we are using Oracle Database). All the master data related to the users is being stored using TIBCO ActiveSpaces which keeps the data in memory and help to retrieve it quickly. It has helped to prevent concurrent login sessions by the same user as session details are stored in TIBCO ActiveSpaces and we override the existing user session with the new session details.
Read full review
Performance
We run a high traffic B2B application on JBoss and it is very stable. Boot time when restarting services is also fast
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Fast response.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
WebSphere Application Server is propriety and increases project cost. It is slightly complicated to learn when compared to Jboss EAP. These were the two main reasons why we chose Red Hat JBoss EAP over WebSphere Application Server. Also, JBoss EAP is light weight and requires less server resource
Read full review
Before using TIBCO ActiveSpaces, we were storing all the data in Oracle Database and due to large volumes of data response time was more and overall performance had reduced. With the introduction of TIBCO ActiveSpaces, we moved the master data to TIBCO ActiveSpaces for storing data which needed frequent access in memory for faster retrieval. This improved the performance significantly and also made managing data easier.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
  • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
Read full review
  • Developers with basic knowledge of TIBCO and general data knowledge can easily design and develop an ActiveSpaces based cached solution. As the ActiveSpaces concepts are very simple and easy to understand.
  • Some business areas can predict the high influx of a service usage during a certain period. Business will be highly rewarded if they can identify these business areas and provide a cached solution using TIBCO AS.
  • Again, this is not a TIBCO ActiveSpaces only advantage and this is true for any/all caching products.
  • Some examples for the previous points are
  • a. telecom company pre-loading (eager load) customer's usage for the last month, right before releasing/issuing the bills to the customers.
  • b. Airline industry loading the customer's itinerary a week before his travel start date. Hence the last minute scrambling to fetch the customer's itinerary travel plans can be avoided.
Read full review
ScreenShots