Red Hat Satellite vs. SUSE Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat Satellite
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat® Satellite is an infrastructure management product specifically designed to keep Red Hat Enterprise Linux® environments and other Red Hat infrastructure running efficiently, with security, and compliant with various standards.N/A
SUSE Manager
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
German company SUSE offers SUSE Manager, a software defined infrastructure Linux server configuration management tool supporting patching, provisioning of Linux servers, and related actions.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat SatelliteSUSE Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat SatelliteSUSE Manager
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat SatelliteSUSE Manager
Features
Red Hat SatelliteSUSE Manager
Configuration Management
Comparison of Configuration Management features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat Satellite
-
Ratings
SUSE Manager
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Infrastructure Automation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated Provisioning00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Parallel Execution00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Node Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Reporting & Logging00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Version Control00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Red Hat SatelliteSUSE Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat SatelliteSUSE Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat Satellite works amazingly with servers that need more control over their packages. For one or two servers that you're just doing "dnf update" Red Hat Satellite is way overkill.
Read full review
In our specific use case, SUSE Manager is extremely useful. We're having a large landscape that is divided into intake, development, quality and production with a couple of different SUSE flavours that need to be automatically rolled out, configured, patched and maintained, everything from up to date repositories that are cloned on a daily basis straight from SUSE.
Read full review
Pros
  • Patch Staging
  • Customized Software Repositories
  • Version Control of Repositories
Read full review
  • Manage the content lifecycle of our products over multiple environments.
  • Use salt to its fullest extent, including pre-generated states that make installation and configuration very easy.
  • Manage repositories.
  • Make it easy to audit our own infrastructure.
  • Make it easy to bootstrap new systems.
Read full review
Cons
  • Some things are confusing for new users of the platform
  • More dashboards
  • A more user friendly GUI
Read full review
  • The cloning of patches when using the content lifecycle module in a multi-environment landscape with many SLES flavours is a bit cumbersome.
  • More premade saltstate for default applications are always nice to have.
  • Upgrading SUMA could be easier, especially when a Postgres upgrade is also required.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I am expanding the use of SUSE Manager throughout our organization and can't imagine going back to the "wild wild west" we had before.
Read full review
Usability
I do feel the overall workflow to setup updates is initally quite cumbersome and requires several steps to get going. I would like to see this process improved. From manually bringing in subscriptions to having to manually enable repositories in multiple places it is just frustrating at times. Thankfully, this is only on setup
Read full review
The gui is extremely user friendly. The installation and configuration does have a learning curve, it takes a while to set everything up. But once you're passed this initial learning curve, everything is very intuitive. If you want extra automation, there's an api (eventough i personally find the documentation of the api could be ordered better). I gave this product a 9 because of the initial learning curve and the api documentation, but for the rest it suits my needs perfectly.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
SUSE Manager provided a top-tier support person on site to us for two days to help integration. We did all the standard stuff they help with before he arrived. We were able to use him to get all the tricky stuff identified and solved in the short time we had. Had they sent us a lower-tier guy, it would have been a waste. I was impressed they sent such knowledgeable person.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
The other competitors also have a good platform and service, but we went with SUSE due to cost. The price was best and we needed to keep under a certain budget. The functionality was perfect for what we needed so we took the step forward. This allows us to manage our Linux environment within the manager and update or deploy specific tasks to each as needed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Flexibility
  • Visibility
  • Security Awareness
Read full review
  • Manages patch levels for most Linux OS by: date, group, cloud or custom channels
  • Make it easy to audit our own infrastructure.
  • Allows the joining of groups inside SUSE Manager to quickly access or work with servers so grouped.
  • 24/7 support team.
  • Automatic deployment.
Read full review
ScreenShots