Reval vs. TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)

Reval is suited to a large number of transactions across a disaggregated business. It may not be well suited where especially complex derivatives and highly stylized reporting are required.

Incentivized

With this robust treasury tool it is very easy to increase the speed of financial operations with, for example, outgoing payments and cash flow analysis management. Liquidity is not a problem thanks to Treasury Intelligence Solutions, we are confident in this tool to fulfill the most important operations of outgoing payments. I can also recommend it because it is very simple to use and it also has a very simple application.

Incentivized

• Automates liquidity management via bank account interfaces across a large number of global bank accounts
• Enables decentralized access and management at, local, regional, and global levels
• End-to-end tracking, reporting, accounting, and settlement of all derivative and financial trades.

Incentivized

• Bank connectivity is as simple as it can be. Well designed making a complex process a little less complex than other providers.
• Transaction support across 15 countries has been Steller. Broad support for methods and formats and issues were resolved quickly.
• Solid systems interface make connecting with ERP and other systems relatively painless.
• As noted earlier, quite flexible for a hosted service.

• The user interface is not as fresh or pretty as some competitors, but is nonetheless very functional.
• Advanced report-writing likewise is not as simple as some competitors, however once set up, reports are usually easy to modify.

Incentivized

• User-friendliness in some areas could be improved. A function that explains buttons would be nice, similar to how it is in SAP with F1. But indeed you can find this on the support portal.
• It is missing the Business Discovery Manager. This will solve many questions, so I cannot complain if we are missing a critical dashboard part of TIS. The logic of Master data and download of the same is done nicely. I would like to build my own report with this, but we would be back to BDM functions.
• The BTM transaction monitor is its greatest strength, but also is a large jungle of entries. You can get lost in there. The deletion function should be upgraded if possible, [because] it's not the easiest to do a mass deletion.
• Filtering of accounts that need to be assigned to the BANK link. It's only a small thing but can be super annoying every time it selects the first bank entry by default.

Incentivized

Depends on stage of the project if it will be postponed in 2023. Se la vie. Will be happy to go on.

The main feature of usability is the outcome you get upon actions done. TIS is not complecated solution - it is rational and has most needed capabilites for cash management via multiple accounts in different jurisdictions. It works well for this task and evolutioning to the field of risk management to get all treasury job done well.

They are usually prompt and reliable. Occasionally, we have time difference issues as support is often offshore some local staff turnover since ION acquired Reval, but this has been managed.

Incentivized

Offered support information in the portal (knowledge base articles) as well members of the support provides a very good service level.

Incentivized

The training addressed our needs.

Incentivized

The cloud connection meant less work for IT. The setup of the first 1000 accounts was very quick, so we went live after only 4 months.

GTreasury acquired Visual Risk (which was an alternative product), but we preferred Reval for processing grunt (albeit GTreasury/Visual risk had an easier user interface). Have used Sungard/Quantum previously, however, I haven't looked at it recently.

Incentivized

The implementation team is strong and supportive of your needs which was important. The solution fit the needs of company very well with many ERP systems and bank accounts. The company was continuing to improve its product based on customer feedback. Strong IT background at the top

Incentivized

• Excellent ROI in terms of being able to scale volume and complexity without adding headcount
• Excellent ROI in terms of automation
• Much more timely and effective management of key financial risks facing the business

Incentivized

In terms of risk mitigation of course we can reduce the number of people having access to banking if not needed. With dedicated teams and less people with access to individual Bank portals. Before access to bank portals were necessary for all sorts of manual payments and exceptions if we really implement the 100% of functions and dont leave exceptions that risk mitigation can be achieved and efficiency at automated payment runs.

• At a large corporation with more than 60 entities and 400+ bank accounts, the savings and improvements are massive considering how time-consuming the manual work would be. I don't have any numbers to quote, unfortunately.
• We are now massively expanding our TIS with the full integration of automated payment runs. This has larger operational impacts, like the possible consolidation of banking and dedicated payment teams.

Incentivized