SAP CLM, discontinued vs. Tradogram

If your business is focused on one specific product or small in scope, Tradogram should be able to suit your needs. If you require simplistic reporting without in depth project codes and details, it does provide basic functionality that is very well suited for small enterprise. Companies that do all of their purchasing with POs will find it to be useful. If you are able to operate without needing it to plug back into a comprehensive ERP system, it should be sufficient.

Incentivized

• User-friendly
• Helpful and attentive staff
• Dashboard
• Easy import/export
• Customizable workflow
• Project coding capabilities

Incentivized

• Reporting is really rigid and not customizable (except at an additional fee)
• The API is new and still requires significant work to connect back into our ERP
• Non-PO invoicing is extremely basic and doesn't draw from existing features
• Can take a lot of clicks to get through a task

Incentivized

We evaluated Procurify as part of our initial scope conversations. Ultimately, we felt that the price point was outside of what we could support and went with the lesser cost of Tradogram instead.

Incentivized

• The product was priced very well as we made the transition from a homegrown internal system.
• The need to pay to customize the system to do what we need it to do has been cumbersome.
• The API connection back to our ERP system has not been optimal and has required us to engage with outside parties to assure that it is working properly.

Incentivized