Arcserve ShadowProtect vs. HPE Zerto Software

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arcserve ShadowProtect
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
ShadowProtect, from Arcserve company StorageCraft (merged in March of 2021), supports business continuity with data backup and system protection; the vendor boasts fast system restore capabilities relative to other similar solutions.N/A
HPE Zerto Software
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
HPE Zerto Software aims to enable customers to run an always-on business by simplifying the protection, recovery, and mobility of on-premises and cloud applications.N/A
Pricing
Arcserve ShadowProtectHPE Zerto Software
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arcserve ShadowProtectHPE Zerto Software
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arcserve ShadowProtectHPE Zerto Software
Considered Both Products
Arcserve ShadowProtect
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
Reliable backup and quick and easy to use.
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
Storagecraft SPX runs circles around Veeam in physical or mixed physical/virtual workloads. In a purely virtual environment, I would go with Veeam. Backup Exec lost favor with me years ago. Carbonite is fine for file-level backups to the cloud but isn’t a good DR option because …
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
SPX is much better at backing up Exchange, SQL, any other databases. I love the SPX disaster recovery features compared to other products.
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
ShadowProtect has great technology, and is easily one of the top 5 backup systems out there.
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
ShadowProtect is less expensive than some and more robust than others, and for us, provided a fine medium on which to build our support platform. The MSP interface for SPX makes licenses easy to track and deploy, as well as to retire. Overall, have been satisfied with this …
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
We have servers dedicated to backups at our client sites so doing a wholesale hardware replacement is really tough. We also have our own cloud that is fairly young, so we don't want to move to a product that forces us into their cloud. We want to use both our cloud and grow …
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
Speed, we rely on Shadowprotect to provide us with fast backups and also backups that are smaller in size compared to the other products.
HPE Zerto Software
Chose HPE Zerto Software
I think Rubrik, VEEAM and Zerto are great products, really depends on the use case. Zerto is probably the best real time replication technology available for VMs to a single or multiple DR datacenter. They claim they have backup capabilities but they are not in the ballpark of …
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Migrations from Hyper-V to VMWare. This something VMware cloud availiblity not can do. Whit migrations from several platforms to VMWare, this is realy a missing part in VMware Cloud availity and a real + in Zerto. The RPO en RTO are almost the same, butnif you realy want 'the …
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Selected Zerto because it met our needs. Plus it was hardware agnostic. Definitely a good product with very good support.
Chose HPE Zerto Software
We initially purchased RecoverPoint and after stumbling through the installation with the consultant and realizing how clumsy and nonautomated it was we began looking elsewhere. We really disliked the amount of setup and manual configuration needed to get basic things …
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Zerto was far and away from a much better product than RecoverPoint. EMC was unable to perform near as fast and as good as Zerto and required a lot more setup and infrastructure to run.
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Zerto is a little more seamless however the price is a little higher than Veeam.
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Hands down Zerto blows VMWare SRM out of the water. The configuration is easy to setup. Managing replications are just a few short key strokes and there is an easy-to-navigate web dashboard.
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Veeam is an impressive solution, however, Zerto has a better feature set, customizable journal, and RPO timing. The price with Zerto was more competitive.
Chose HPE Zerto Software
We use VMware vSphere Replication as our disaster recovery tool for our Tier 2/3 systems. This was chosen as it saves us costs for our less critical, but still needed systems that keep our company running. Putting everything on Zerto would be great, but with this combination, …
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Zerto is best suited for critical applications that need live replication and lossless recovery. In the case of less critical VMs, we use Veeam.
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Zerto replication is a lot cheaper than any of the completion, it’s simple to set up and use, requires minimal training for users, and its simple interface and groups using VPG enables a granular setup. It just does what it says and is simple, reliable, and relatively cheap
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Zerto solves issues with snapshot-based backups and provides continuous data protection up to 14 days with an astonishing granularity. Zerto's One-2-Many can provide local and offsite backups with near real-time and fast restore of a VM
Zerto does not backup physical machines …
Chose HPE Zerto Software
With Zerto we are able to bring up environment faster and with less data loss without having to set backups every hour and replication to match
Chose HPE Zerto Software
While more expensive, Zerto does a better job of protecting our servers and keeping the RPO low. It was also supported by our financial core which was a huge factor in our adoption. However, one it was put into our system, we wanted to adopt it company wide. As long as you …
Chose HPE Zerto Software
We looked at both CommVault and NetBackup, which are similar platforms to that of the Zerto Replication Software stack. We thought the Zerto solution best met our specification needs, as well as our cost needs. The CommVault licensing was complicated, and we just have had a bad …
Chose HPE Zerto Software
We started out using Backup Exec which was in service until we virtualized our environment where it didn't perform as well at the time. Then we switched to Veeam which worked well, but then as we started needing to do migrations and off-site DR, we found ourselves relying on …
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Compared to VMware SRM, Zerto Virtual Replication is much simpler to use and is hypervisor agnostic.
Chose HPE Zerto Software
The speed of WAN replication is great. It is faster compared to RecoverPoint and 20 VMs replicating over a 20Mbps VPN, which has a RPO less than one minute. Of course, your mileage will vary.
Chose HPE Zerto Software
We used to use Veeam for our replication solution but due to the snapshot issues that we used to experience with our larger virtual machines, i.e we would encounter some lost of connectivity. We were told by two of our partners that Zerto would solve our needs and we did our …
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Zerto is easy to install and maintain. Most importantly, the replication feature with a journal that provides recovery point every few seconds cannot be found in any other software we evaluated.
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Physical recoverpoint and virtual Recovperpoint for VMware are still very basic in their feature set. Physical recoverpoint requires months of planning, installation, configuration, before systems are replicated and then protected. There is no backup feature such as Zerto, …
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Recoverpoint only handled the array level replication, and that left the VMs unaccounted for. Zerto does both.
Chose HPE Zerto Software
Zerto replicates at the hypervisor level, not the VM level like VMware Site Recovery Manager (SRM). SRM replicates vms within or across vSphere clusters, but not between different hypervisors. While I only replicate from vcenter to vcenter, if we needed to replicate to a …
Features
Arcserve ShadowProtectHPE Zerto Software
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Arcserve ShadowProtect
7.4
Ratings
10% below category average
HPE Zerto Software
8.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Universal recovery8.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Instant recovery8.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Recovery verification7.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Business application protection9.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations8.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Incremental backup identification8.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Backup to the cloud5.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression6.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Snapshots6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Flexible deployment7.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Management dashboard7.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Platform support8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Retention options9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Encryption8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Arcserve ShadowProtect
8.0
Ratings
6% below category average
HPE Zerto Software
8.3
Ratings
2% below category average
Continuous data protection9.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Replication7.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Malware protection00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Disaster Recovery
Comparison of Disaster Recovery features of Product A and Product B
Arcserve ShadowProtect
7.0
Ratings
14% below category average
HPE Zerto Software
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Disaster Recovery Planning7.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Hot Sites7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Disaster Recovery Testing7.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Automated Disaster Recovery7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Arcserve ShadowProtectHPE Zerto Software
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Keepit
Keepit
Score 9.7 out of 10
Keepit
Keepit
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Arcserve ShadowProtectHPE Zerto Software
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arcserve ShadowProtectHPE Zerto Software
Likelihood to Recommend
If we have a scenario where we need very fast backup/ a lot of backups per hour we tend to go towards ShadowProtect , we have several customers with important servers that we backup each 15 minutes with a VSS consistent snapshot. The continuous incremental option also allows us to create one "full backup" and never again afterwards. This gives us the possibility to give longer retention periods to our customers.
Read full review
Zerto is well suited for disaster recovery and virtual machine replication between multiple data centers. DR testing for audit or regulations is much easier with Zerto, great reporting, dashboard etc. It is not well suited for physical server replication for disaster recovery or as a primary backup solution.
Read full review
Pros
  • Shadowprotect has a relatively simple interface so it's easy to set up.
  • Due to the simple UI, it is easy to restore files.
  • Imagemanage works fairly well once it's set up and doesn't need much babysitting.
Read full review
  • It is simple to set up and use. In my opinion, one of the most important functions of a tool is its interface. If you have the best product in the world but it takes an arm and a leg to configure and a doctorate degree to use, then the product isn't worth very much.
  • The continuous replication is done very well. The failover and failback process runs smoothly.
  • This has less to do with the product than the company, but Zerto as a company really listens to their customer base. We've always had a very good interpersonal experience with their support and sales teams. Having great people behind their product is definitely one of Zerto's strengths.
Read full review
Cons
  • The replication offsite can have issues over time. It takes manual involvement to keep it working right.
  • SPX remote management isn't easy out of the box.
Read full review
  • Moving a VM from one protection group to another could be simplified.
  • I would like to see an executive-style report of recovery and testing for upper management.
  • The ability to deploy Zerto as a virtual appliance, without the need for a windows server.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We really like the easy setup of this replication solution, as well as the ease of management. Not to mention, our internal IT Economist determined that the Zerto solution would provide the best ROI out of the competing solutions we analyzed. So far, his calculations have been spot on, and we have saved substantially
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Zerto is very easy to implement and support. Uses are broad, only issues are once something doesn't sync it is difficult to get assistance until your reach tier 2 or tier 3 support. Basic file and folder recovery is great. Live and test fail overs are also easy to implement without issue.
Read full review
Support Rating
We don’t need support often, but when we do, the support has been strong. Sometimes it is hard to determine how to access support for the exact issue we are having. There are a decent forum and online ticketing system. Support for the cloud center seems to be provided only by phone, though.
Read full review
Very responsive, very capable. Overall, the product is very easy to set up and configure. Problems usually encroach when lower-level components are updated for changed, for instance, vSphere. Support usually can help us work through any issues that pop up from upgrades to other software, but their own updates can lag behind a little.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Ease and speed of initial co figuration.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ShadowProtect is less expensive than some and more robust than others, and for us, provided a fine medium on which to build our support platform. The MSP interface for SPX makes licenses easy to track and deploy, as well as to retire. Overall, have been satisfied with this choice.
Read full review
Zerto solves issues with snapshot-based backups and provides continuous data protection up to 14 days with an astonishing granularity. Zerto's One-2-Many can provide local and offsite backups with near real-time and fast restore of a VM
Zerto does not backup physical machines or VMs that are turned off, but there are other products to do that.
Other backup products are stepping up with ease of deployment and small organizations would find them a little easier to use as there are fewer configuration options.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It had a positive ROI due to the ability to offer better backup technology to our clients.
  • There is a large up-front fee you need to pay, though, as you need a minimum number of licenses to resell as MSP.
Read full review
  • DR and CyberSecurity recovery can be done in minutes or a few hours via Zerto, as opposed to days with backup/recovery.
  • DR testing and recovery can be done anytime in an isolated environment to test recoverability and functionality.
  • Zerto licensing is very affordable to protect critical business functions.
  • On-prem to cloud migrations are very quick and easy to perform.
Read full review
ScreenShots

HPE Zerto Software Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of AnalyticsScreenshot of DashboardScreenshot of Failover TestScreenshot of vSphere