Progress ShareFile

Progress ShareFile

256 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Progress ShareFile	Score8.3 out of 10	N/A	ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011.	$52.80 per month 3 users (minimum)

Pricing

Progress ShareFile

Advanced: $17.60
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Premium: $27.50
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Industry Advantage: $45.83
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Virtual Data Room: $75.00
per month per user (minimum 5 users)

Pricing Offerings
Progress ShareFile
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

Discount available for annual pricing.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Progress ShareFile
Considered Both Products	Progress ShareFile Terry Hamberg Publisher in Corporate at Northern Kittitas County Tribune (Media Production, 1-10 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile ShareFile offers more professional level services, and doesn't constantly "run out" of space, forcing you to upgrade to continue. When doing a cost comparison, the competitors may seem cheaper at first, but by the time you add on the features to make it comparable, the pricing … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Progress ShareFile The ability to learn how to access, store, share, and retrieve documents is simpler than in other applications, and that is what keeps me in the application. Even though my Microsoft 365 professional and Adobe Acrobat Pro applications, which I currently subscribe to, include … Incentivized Helpful? Tom Hamilton Sr. Engineer in Information Technology at Estes Express Lines (Transportation/Trucking/Railroad, 10,001+ employees) Chose Progress ShareFile Dropbox and others like Mega is are open to anyone and when they leave your company they take those documents with them. ShareFile give secure sharing but you keep control of your documents. ShareFile also offers other tools like Outlook plug-ins and windows mapping tools. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Progress ShareFile ShareFile is cheaper, but I think Box had more user friendly features Incentivized Helpful? Christy Chapman Executive Director in Corporate at Chapman Consulting Group, LLC (Hospital & Health Care, 11-50 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile DocuSign did not allow me to save directly to a client folder. ShareFile will allow this, and it cut out having to move or download the file then store it in a client folder. We used that along with Dropbox. Dropbox did not allow us to seamlessly see who had access to what … Incentivized Helpful? Ryan Ippolito Partner in Finance and Accounting at MidAtlantic CPAs (Accounting, 11-50 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile I use ShareFile because it is simple and offers easy use of esignatures - and unlimited. DocuSign is getting expensive and charges often on a per "envelope" basis which doesn't work for me. Incentivized Helpful? Judy Hughes CSR/Agent in Customer Service at Anderson and Green Insurance, LLC (Insurance, 11-50 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile Ease of use, cost and proficiency is above and beyond what other products offer. Customer service is down to earth, and you feel like your concerns are addressed appropriately. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Progress ShareFile I chose to stick with ShareFile because of the signature certificate feature that is included with the software. The two programs are both relativley easy for me to use, but Adobe Acrobat does not have this feature included. Additionally, ShareFile can be opened in Browser and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Progress ShareFile The ShareFile website never broke, so we switched the signature service to this platform too. Because in PandaDoc sometimes it was hard to find some signed documents from years ago, also we couldn't find an efficient way to order the signature documents for each client, but … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Progress ShareFile A lot more user friendly and less phone calls for assistance which make the purpose of smooth electronic communication a great thing. I like that it doesn't require 1 person to sign before the other person can and that we are notified separately once each person signs required … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Progress ShareFile The large file size for uploading and downloading documents was the one thing that the others just couldn't compare to. Incentivized Helpful? Sergio Sancho Product Manager in Product Management at Golmar Sistemas de Comunicación (Information Technology & Services, 51-200 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile Other platforms allow you to share information but without the security and confirmation guarantees that ShareFile offers. Although they provide fewer features, they are often less intuitive and less easy to work with. To date we do not consider trying other options, as we do … Incentivized Helpful? Richard Corner Senior Partner in Professional Services at Hudson + Associates Architects (Architecture & Planning, 1-10 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile We have one consulting engineer that uses MS SharePoint. We find it comparable to ShareFile, but see no particular advantage to it over ShareFile. We don't really know a lot about it, or what it costs to use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Progress ShareFile I think Dropbox is a plague to the world of cloud storage. It sucks. ShareFile doesn't suck. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Progress ShareFile For an organization that requires reliable security when sending sensitive data, ShareFile is the application to use. ShareFile has multiple features to ensure that the right information is being sent with the file so the end receiver has the pertinent information when the file … Incentivized Helpful? Pamela Corn Owner in Professional Services at Corn & Corn PLLC (Accounting, 1-10 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile I like ShareFile much better than Mango Practice Management. I think the navigation is much more intuitive and user-friendly. Incentivized Helpful? Guy Page Sr Director of Operations in Research & Development at AnaBios (Research, 11-50 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile The workflow are more difficult to follow in the others. Incentivized Helpful? Kate Herman Owner CPA in Finance and Accounting at Katharine G Herman CPA (Accounting, 1-10 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile I feel ShareFile is much more secure. Incentivized Helpful? Gabriel Krozkin CEO (Chief Executive Officer) in Professional Services at Gabriel Krozkin, CPA Professional Corporation (Accounting, 1-10 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile ShareFile is better and easier to use than other products (i.e. SmartVault). I love ShareFile's ability to set up new clients easily. Their customer service is excellent as well. For any accounting firm, this is a great tool to have. Do not hesitate, you will not regret it. I … Incentivized Helpful? Carlos Rangel, CPA, MBA Managing Director in Finance and Accounting at Carlos Rangel, CPA PC (Accounting, 1-10 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile No other applications used. Incentivized Helpful? Shivam Sharma Consultant in Information Technology at T-Systems ICT India Pvt. Ltd. (Information Technology & Services, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile Citrix RightSignature meets the needs of our business better than DocuSign. It also has an awesome interface that lets me keep track of pending documents and integrate with our webform on our website. Along with the e-signature features it offers best encryption. Also, customer … Incentivized Helpful? Curtis Neuman owner in Finance and Accounting at Financial Security Group Inc (Financial Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile DocuSign is well known and accepted and recognized in the industry overall but a subscription is needed for full usage Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Progress ShareFile I haven't used any other products yet. Incentivized Helpful? Mike Narumiya President, Principal in Information Technology at Klaxon IT Solutions (Hospital & Health Care, 11-50 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile ShareFile is easier and does what you need. I have moved a few organizations from SharePoint to ShareFile. Just easier. You can setup different areas for different departments, setup their permissions and it is easy enough for them to do what they want in their zones. The … Incentivized Helpful? Alvin Landicho Cloud Integration Consultant in Information Technology at Axle Cloud (Information Technology & Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Progress ShareFile First and foremost we are both a Citrix and Microsoft partner so we will always recommend their products. 3 years ago we found ShareFile's biggest selling point was the ease of setup, administration, and ease of use while still being an enterprise-grade product. We also enjoyed … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

Features

Progress ShareFile

Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Progress ShareFile
Feature	Progress ShareFile 8.3 78 Ratings
Versioning	7.660 Ratings
Video files	9.048 Ratings
Audio files	9.644 Ratings
Document collaboration	6.567 Ratings
Access control	7.873 Ratings
File search	8.274 Ratings
Device sync	9.559 Ratings

Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Progress ShareFile
Feature	Progress ShareFile 9.5 73 Ratings
User and role management	9.566 Ratings
File organization	9.873 Ratings
Device management	9.156 Ratings

Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Progress ShareFile
Feature	Progress ShareFile 6.2 74 Ratings
Performance	4.970 Ratings
Reliability	4.973 Ratings
Storage Reports	8.857 Ratings

User Ratings
	Progress ShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend	7.8 (101 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.1 (8 ratings)
Usability	9.1 (19 ratings)
Availability	9.1 (1 ratings)
Performance	9.1 (14 ratings)
Support Rating	1.0 (14 ratings)
Implementation Rating	9.1 (3 ratings)
Configurability	6.6 (2 ratings)
Ease of integration	1.0 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	1.0 (1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	9.1 (1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	9.1 (1 ratings)