SingleStore

SingleStore

110 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
SingleStore	Score7.5 out of 10	N/A	SingleStore aims to enable organizations to scale from one to one million customers, handling SQL, JSON, full text and vector workloads in one unified platform.	$0.69 per hour

Pricing

SingleStore

OnDemand: $0.69
per hour

Pricing Offerings
SingleStore
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes

Optional

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	SingleStore
Considered Both Products	SingleStore Victor Cáceres Database Administrator (DBA) in Information Technology at Cooperativa CREA (Financial Services, 51-200 employees) Chose SingleStore I can only compare it with Exasol, which I have used a similar base, which manages the Hadoop scheme and is very similar to SingleStore. SingleStore has many advantages: being in the cloud, with just a couple of clicks I can increase the capacity, the configuration is super … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore first of all SingleStoreis a cluster with high availability and easy to use. you need to design you tables / procedures such in a way that your SingleStore perform well and with handle heavy load Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore Reduces database sprawl, ETL costs, infrastructure expenses, etc. Supports horizontal scaling, unlike PostgreSQL & Aurora, and real-time analytics and fast transactions (HTAP), unlike Snowflake & ClickHouse.Handles high-volume workloads with thousands of concurrent queries. No … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore (memsql) out performs based on our analysis with sample data sets within org. We could see limitations with other products which SingleStore can overcall like scaling with data while performing with similar SLA. It also has the advantage of row store and column … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore Efficient and faster data ingestion was primary criteria. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore outperforms Snowflake in real-time analytics and transactional workloads but lags in large-scale batch processing. Compared to MongoDB Atlas, SingleStore excels in complex SQL queries and joins, while MongoDB handles unstructured, document-based data better. Its … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore Greenplum is good in handling very large amount of data. Concurrency in Greenplum was a major problem. Features available in SingleStore like Pipelines and in memory features are not available in Greenplum. Gemfire was not scaling well like SingleStore. Support of both … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore No contest Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore We previously used Bigquery for our application, and a single store gave us very good performance over Bigquery. But the comparison is not apples to apples, as Bigquery is more of a data warehousing solution. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore is just a bigger engine with more capability. Its ability to handle larger data sets with ease is its biggest advantage. These other database solutions are great for smaller scale projects that don't include large data sets but Singlestore greatly out performs in … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore DynamoDB was fast but no ability to do OLAP queries Aurora couldn't handle our data scale at all Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore It has more APIs and other access methods. It has a multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) Distributed RDBMS that combines an in-memory row-oriented and a disc-based column-oriented storage with patented universal storage to handle transactional and analytical workloads in … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore Its easier to query and faster. Ingestion is for the most part easier to understand and monitor and directly integrated with other storage solution products we use such as AWS S3. Singlestore overall is a better database to serve up an application large amounts of data very … Incentivized Helpful? Sergiu Cazac Founder in Information Technology at Personizely (Computer Software, 1-10 employees) Chose SingleStore ClickHouse - would still require us to have a separate db. Elasticsearch - seemed too complex for us. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore provided the best performance for our need to slice and dice for a large columnar dataset. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore is built for fast data ingestion and fast queries against large tables (> billions of rows). This is possible because of the column store engine that SingleStore uses. SingleStore also support a memory engine. Pipelines is also another big advantage. Being able to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore has outperformed these in speed and performance. However it is more expensive but has been worth the cost so far. Incentivized Helpful? Jon Milsom Co-Founder & CTO in Engineering at PitcheroGPS (Sports, 11-50 employees) Chose SingleStore We knew early on that MySQL (Amazon Aurora) would not be suitable for this workload as it cannot query our time series data as fast as SingleStore. We also use MongoDB Atlas for another application but we could not achieve the raw speed we saw from SingleStore. Our technical … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore We were initially using AWS Aurora which worked well at the time but as we grew it just felt like a lumbering beast - even with tier upgrades. We started looking at caching & search options to help make searches faster - we were already using redis. We looked at and even … Incentivized Helpful? Charlie Joseph Head of Analytics in Research & Development at Overwolf (Computer Software, 51-200 employees) Chose SingleStore Timescale was the biggest alternative option we looked at for SingleStore, however the requirement to learn a new syntax (due to not being SQL compatible) was our biggest pain point. Supporting a new language would require alterations to the Laravel framework, as this only … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore provides an abstraction layer in managing a sharded database solution reducing complexity for the FLOWD team. Coupled with the SingleStore Managed Service, we are partnering with SingleStore to provide FLOWD services to various utilities & councils. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore is eons faster than other database providers, and it absolutely crushes calculations & aggregations. While other providers may have a few quality of life enhancements over SingleStore, the speed benefits of SS far outweigh the cons. At the end of the day, speed … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore provides performance for real-time data analytics application where as Snowflake is more for data engineers and not fast enough for real-time data analytics apps. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore As I said before, we felt that running queries on BigQuery for every query is really slow, especially from an user point of view. After seeing the drastically improved latency of SingleStore we decided to use to solve this issue. We currently use it to run low volume queries … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose SingleStore SingleStore was the fastest sql database we have tried, allowing for analytical queries on TBs of data. Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	SingleStore
Likelihood to Recommend	7.6 (70 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.2 (5 ratings)
Usability	8.2 (8 ratings)
Availability	9.1 (2 ratings)
Performance	8.2 (44 ratings)
Support Rating	8.4 (9 ratings)
Online Training	7.3 (1 ratings)
Implementation Rating	7.3 (2 ratings)
Ease of integration	9.1 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	8.2 (2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	8.2 (2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	8.2 (2 ratings)