Siteimprove vs. Topic

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Siteimprove
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The Siteimprove platform offers tools used to create digital experiences optimized for quality, accessibility, analytics, and SEO. Sitemprove offers content insights and recommendations in a prioritized list to improve the impact of changes. It is available through three solution packages (Inclusivity, Content Experience, and Marketing Performance).N/A
Topic
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Topic, from Topic or Chia Labs, Inc, aims to make it easier for writers to create comprehensive content. Its AI analyzes the top results in Google, extracts key topics to cover, and provides an interactive editor to allow writers to grade their work. The system gives actionable suggestions to enable writers to create content in order to drive results.
$99
per month ($10 per brief)
Pricing
SiteimproveTopic
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$99
per month ($10 per brief)
Plus
$199
per month ($8 per brief)
Premium
$299
per month ($6 per brief)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SiteimproveTopic
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details20% discount for annual payment.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SiteimproveTopic
Considered Both Products
Siteimprove
Chose Siteimprove
Siteimprove helps complement other SEO tracking tools by providing a different view of metrics and greater visibility into KPIs.
Chose Siteimprove
I prefer Siteimprove to all above for their easy to view and use dashboards. The visual aspect of SiteImprove makes it easy to pick up for everyone - as we have experienced in our team. We've only had 1 training session on it, as opposed to the multiple for the other things we …
Chose Siteimprove
The ability to take the raw data and put it into a user-friendly format.
Chose Siteimprove
Siteimprove provides richer features when it comes to how granular you can define policies and metrics for search engine optimization and content relevance. It is also much easier to set up and maintain the sites that you want to administer. However, pricing wise is more costly …
Chose Siteimprove
These tools allow you to make your site accessible without affecting its performance or design at all!
Chose Siteimprove
Compared to any other tool I've used, Siteimprove is the best. Many tasks that I used to do manually have become more accessible and faster due to it. The visual scanning of issues is what makes it the best. It's simple to find problems, fix them, and track how far we've come. …
Chose Siteimprove
I do like Siteimprove, but we are moving on to Monsido purely for costs. Monsido costs a third less than Siteimprove and offers the same functionality.
Chose Siteimprove
This was a replacement to IBM Policy Tester.
Chose Siteimprove
We have used or tested other tools that get installed on a computer or that are hosted online, but none of them offer the features that come with Siteimprove. TotalValidator Pro will check your site for accessibility issues, but it is a manual check and there is no historical …
Chose Siteimprove
In terms of WCAG, accessiBE is the more value oriented product with easy to understand results, less false positives, better WCAG results. That said, it's also a single focused tool, whereas Siteimprove is geared towards overarching web governance. There are simply no other …
Chose Siteimprove
Siteimprove is superior to Ahrefs due to it's clean and intuitive user interface and seamless navigation. Ahrefs contains a more robuts data set but the information is often difficult to locate and take action on because of how it's displayed to users. Siteimprove has less data …
Topic
Chose Topic
Topic was way less costly than MarketMuse with similar functionality. It was agnostic to CMS (Wordlift is designed for Wordpress only). So it was priced well with all the functionality we needed.
Features
SiteimproveTopic
Web Analytics
Comparison of Web Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Siteimprove
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Topic
-
Ratings
Lead Conversion Tracking10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bounce Rate Measurement7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Device and Browser Reporting5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Pageview Tracking8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Event Tracking8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting in real-time4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Referral Source Tracking7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Dashboards10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO
Comparison of SEO features of Product A and Product B
Siteimprove
-
Ratings
Topic
8.8
Ratings
13% above category average
Keyword analysis00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
SERP ranking tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Page grader00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Competitive analysis00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
SEO Channels
Comparison of SEO Channels features of Product A and Product B
Siteimprove
-
Ratings
Topic
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
Local SEO00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mobile SEO00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
SEO Platform & Account Management
Comparison of SEO Platform & Account Management features of Product A and Product B
Siteimprove
-
Ratings
Topic
10.0
Ratings
17% above category average
Multi-domain support00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integration with web analytics tools00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SiteimproveTopic
Small Businesses
StatCounter
StatCounter
Score 9.0 out of 10
Nozzle
Nozzle
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
Advanced Web Ranking
Advanced Web Ranking
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SiteimproveTopic
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SiteimproveTopic
Likelihood to Recommend
Simple, easy-to-deploy accessibility that automatically scans, remediates and provides proof of compliance once the process is complete. It is ideal for people who want to make their website much more accessible and provide their users with an intuitive adjustable interface.
Read full review
Great at providing content briefs as well as for seeing the types of topics that rank well competitively. It's also good with finding content that needs to be refreshed which is a super easy way to drive near term SEO results.
Read full review
Pros
  • User-friendly customisable dashboards, easy to make a dashboard from a template, or create your own, and add in whichever 'widgets' are relevant for what you are looking at
  • Flagging words to review, allowing users to check and confirm if the word is 'accepted' or is a misspelling
Read full review
  • Content Brief
  • Competitive SERP ranking analysis
  • Grouping content topics together to see related keywords/ content clusters easily
  • Analyzing Google Search Console data for content refresh opportunities
Read full review
Cons
  • I don't like that there are different navigation paths to go from point A to point B. When I want to navigate to a specific place, I have more than one way to get there, which means I have to make a decision about how I want to there and I'd rather the designer make that design based on what would be most efficient for me.
Read full review
  • Using the GSC data to find new, adjacent content opportunities.
  • They are using GPT-3 for title generation and would love to see it used to provide more content suggestions beyond the titles/descriptions
  • Sometimes it doesn't surface 'questions' that people are asking related to lower volume terms but not sure of a way to solve that
Read full review
Usability
Tool has undergone numerous changes, both to function and UX/CX. Makes it less than user friendly at times. But on the other hand, that does indicate a willingness to improve the product in a continual manner - which they've done nearly year after year - but it's always a case of who moved my cheese with each new iteration.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I've used support often and it has been responsive, thorough and considerate of our needs. I can get a tech right away, they understand the issue, and work with us to resolve it. Often the problem is with the site we are trying to scan, sometimes it is with their product. I appreciate that they go beyond support into continually helping us implement SiteImprove in more places with 3rd party integration.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Siteimprove provides richer features when it comes to how granular you can define policies and metrics for search engine optimization and content relevance. It is also much easier to set up and maintain the sites that you want to administer. However, pricing wise is more costly which can be a constraint for smaller organizations.
Read full review
Topic was way less costly than MarketMuse with similar functionality. It was agnostic to CMS (WordLift is designed for Wordpress only). So it was priced well with all the functionality we needed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Siteimprove has helped bring our accessibility scores up from middling to near-perfect.
  • Siteimprove has helped reduce our broken links, style violations and misspellings.
  • Siteimprove's heatmaps have helped us make the case for enforcing best practices on the website among key stakeholders.
Read full review
  • It has greatly reduced the number of hours our SEO team has to review content
  • Has sped up our content briefs by hours per brief
  • Great for helping us to see what content is performing well / needs help via the Google Search Console integration
Read full review
ScreenShots

Topic Screenshots

Screenshot of Outline BuilderScreenshot of Writing Grading