SolarWinds AppOptics vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SolarWinds AppOptics
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
SolarWinds AppOptics (formerly Librato) is an IT infrastructure monitoring service and APM, based on technology acquired by SolarWinds with Librato in 2015 to expand its cloud monitoring portfolio.N/A
SolarWinds Pingdom
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
SolarWinds Pingdom is a website uptime monitoring and alert tool, with additional reporting and Real User Monitoring capabilities. Pingdom is part of SolarWinds’s DevOps package, enabling full-stack monitoring as a service.
$10
per month
Pricing
SolarWinds AppOpticsSolarWinds Pingdom
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Synthetic Monitoring
$10
per month
Real User Monitoring
$10
per month
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SolarWinds AppOpticsSolarWinds Pingdom
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SolarWinds AppOpticsSolarWinds Pingdom
Considered Both Products
SolarWinds AppOptics
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
Prometheus and Amazon CloudWatch
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
AppOptics was about 60% cheaper with most of the functionalities that we needed. Datadog had some advanced features which were not important to us, and hence we decided to go with AppOptics.
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
Everyone used to know the names of AppDynamics and Dynatrace when it comes to APM or Application Tracing Monitoring. Since these tools were the evolver of this particular technology, I still believe that these tools are the market player. But SolarWinds AppOptics is not less, …
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
We've been using Traceview and now SolarWinds AppOptics since I joined HubSpot.
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
As an early-stage startup, we evaluated the different options on the following parameters: Functionality Monitoring overhead Cost Easy-to-use dashboard AppOptics had most of the features that we needed and offered their services at a reasonable price that made sense for …
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
What we found positive in AppOptics from others is:
  • Easy to install and manage.
  • Various stack support.
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
AppOptics is way more user friendly than Kibana. When you first log in to AppOptics, you have the information you need very easily while Kibana takes a lot of learning before getting your first results. Kibana almosts requires the help of developers and technicians to learn how …
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
It was a decision made based on our requirements. We felt like AppOptics gave us what we need precisely. When we tried it out, we were satisfied with the performance. It didn't compare to the rest in the market.
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
Azure Monitor, NGINX, Docker and Laravel PHP Framework
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
We felt the competitors were both more expensive and more difficult to configure and deploy. We selected SolarWinds AppOptics because it provided better value both in terms of cost and user experience.
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
I have not used other products but in my organization, one team is using Datadog for monitoring.
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
SolarWinds AppOptics serves a specific use case for us--diving down on the application layer to identify root causes of latency. It does not offer the same use case as SignalFx, which offers metrics for the overall service and integration for custom metrics. AppOptics also does …
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
The alerting capability was far better.
Transaction tracking was implemented beautifully in SolarWinds AppOptics.
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
Although AppOptics is very similar to New Relic feature-wise, we choose to use it for its ease of setting up services and intuitive UI.
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
We analyzed a number of alternatives to AppOptics, but none combined strong performance in all of our key areas - we needed a solution which could be deployed on premise, supported multi tenant hosts, provided the ability to analyse individual requests, presented intuitive …
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
Pricing, faster, availability, easy debugging, easy to use/understand.
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
AppOptics provides us visibility of the overall system. SLACK helps us to keep the communication better among our collegues. Sentry One is also being used to dive deeper into SQL queries performance tuning. SolarWinds AppOptics clearly displays the flow of information in …
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
We went from a recommendation. We looked at no others
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
I have previously used New Relic APM, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Browser, New Relic Server, New Relic Insights, and Dynatrace.
Chose SolarWinds AppOptics
AppDynamics was a product that we evaluated along with AppOptics. A lot of our decision came down to price.
SolarWinds Pingdom
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
At least during our investigation thus far, all of these companies have a more responsive support organization and are more actively maintaininbg and supporting their products. They are also all significantly more expensive.
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
I have used Datadog's testing, and it is far more in-depth but more expensive. Pingdom was simple and easy to set up and very reliable, but Datadog had more advanced features but also cost a lot more and wasn't as simple to set up.
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
We have been with Pingdom since before it was SolarWinds Pingdom. It remains stable and solutions driven and has done so for many years. While it has many features we do not utilize, we are always looking to see which ones we can start to use when we have time. Some of the more …
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
We have only used Pingdom for these needs, so I can't speak directly to competitors. That being said, for the reasons we used Pingdom it was fantastic value and the fact we never bothered to look for a competitor speaks volumes about our satisfaction with the product.
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
We use a mixture of atlassian products and chose to use this at the beginning of 2020 when our org switched to full remote work posture. While it was nice having integration with opsgenie and our jira ticketing system it did not provide quite the mixture of flexibility and …
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
We did not evaluate other products, as we are already a SolarWinds customer, having used Orion for several years.
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
  1. PRTG Network Monitor was a far more complicated tool to use and set up albeit it does both Internal and External monitoring. The setup wasn't intuitive and there are too many configuration options to complete to form an alert
  2. Amazon Cloudwatch is specific to AWS resources and …
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
We did not evaluate other products as we felt that Pingdom's reputation was enough to encourage us to use the product
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
SolarWinds Dameware Remote Support (DRS), SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer (NTA), SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (NPM) and SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM)
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
We actually use both new relic and pingdom
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
It is very suitable for our organization as metrics that it provides like disk space, CPU usage and availability of application, etc. And the main thing is it has good integration with OpsGenie and Jira software so when our application is down or has any issue then we get a …
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
Some of the products mentioned here are much more "holistic solutions" for monitoring, analyzing, logging, alerting, etc., but for the use case, we use SolarWinds Pingdom. I think that SolorWinds Pingdom is much simpler and friendlier for configuring and maintaining. We …
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
we migrated from site 24x7 to pingdom because we have been facing issues with the monitoring and alerting. Our customers would reach out to us first rather than our monitoring tool notifying us that there is a problem. Its administration is also very complicated and compared to …
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
We have looked into using New Relic Synthetics to achieve the same results we are achieving with Pingdom, ultimately Pingdom is significantly cheaper for essentially the same functionality.
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
We selected SolarWinds Pingdom based on the feature set we desired, which was simply a monitoring solution for our websites and other critical network services. The decision to use SolarWinds Pingdom was based on the simplicity of their mobile app and website.
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
Pingdom is best at what it does: simple uptime checks.
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
We continue to use SolarWinds Pingdom because it hasn't failed us. If it did, we'd change to other providers, but we have no reason to do so.
Chose SolarWinds Pingdom
Newrelic has some simple uptime monitoring but it has very unclear pricing, which depends on how often you ping. And for our needs the next pricing bracket was way too much, maybe 10x. This could make sense if we were going to use the other monitoring capabilities of NewRelic …
Features
SolarWinds AppOpticsSolarWinds Pingdom
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
SolarWinds AppOptics
6.9
Ratings
10% below category average
SolarWinds Pingdom
-
Ratings
Application monitoring8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Database monitoring7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Threshold alerts6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive capabilities4.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Application performance management console7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration tools6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SolarWinds AppOpticsSolarWinds Pingdom
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.8 out of 10
Cisco ThousandEyes
Cisco ThousandEyes
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.8 out of 10
Nexthink
Nexthink
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SolarWinds AppOpticsSolarWinds Pingdom
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.6
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
4.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SolarWinds AppOpticsSolarWinds Pingdom
Likelihood to Recommend
AppOptics is good for small to medium-sized organizations with less than 150 servers or less than 40 services to monitor. It performs well for this use case where people need to get an overview of application performance, and 95%ile data is okay. Somewhere every data point and every record is critical; it should be avoided.
Read full review
Pingdom is well suited to monitor any of your public facing IPs, so you receive an alert by text message or email when the IP you are monitoring does not respond for a given length of time, from an impressive 10ms to 30s. This allows you to be pretty granular with the alerting. It's less appropriate for monitoring IPs on your LAN, unless you NAT these through your firewall.
Read full review
Pros
  • SolarWinds AppOptics has an easy to use and fast interface. Thus, you can use time more efficiently.
  • SolarWinds AppOptics has as many details as you want. So you only display deep details when you want.
  • SolarWinds AppOptics already has many plugins. So you can easily connect with your other services.
Read full review
  • Alerting, particularly the integration with PagerDuty.
  • Reporting: the ability to go back and view the history of each status check (including details about every failure) as well as graphs and reports over a longer time period.
  • Weekly uptime report emails are very convenient.
  • Programmatic configuration is possible with a third-party Terraform plugin.
Read full review
Cons
  • The only thing that I would add is the possibility to display every single query our servers receive to eventually analyze them and query through them. We could also generate nice visualizations from that. Right now I believe we can only see averages.
Read full review
  • sometimes sends false alerts
  • there should be some threshold value for when an application is not reachable, it should alert after 30 seconds and keep sending hello packets for those 30 seconds and if still there is no response, then it should send the alert.
  • too many unwanted metrics.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have been using AppOptics for over 3.5 years and expect to continue to renew it for the foreseeable future
Read full review
Recently added features have made Pingdom less intuitive for our requirements. While Pingdom has a broad offering and remains a good value, it is becoming more than we need. Our customer base is becoming more and more global and Pingdom still lacks Asia-Pacific monitoring, which we will need within a year.
Read full review
Usability
AppOptics has performed well for all of the major functions we have needed it for. Especially when it comes to tracking down response time issues and researching app performance for different pages and different times of day we have been able to do everything we need to. We know there are some more advanced features that could help us in more niche areas, but haven't had the time to delve deeper into using or setting them up.
Read full review
Pingdom is easy to use, very intuitive and has a very short learning curve. From the onset, we've been able to jump in and leverage the tool to accomplish our goals for page speed performance and discover the insights we need to make improvements. Its a well-designed tool and makes for a good user experience.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Interface is unnecessarily complicated and frequently responds slowly.
Read full review
Support Rating
Solarwinds AppOptics is rated as 9 out of 10 and the reason is there are still few areas where AppOptics needs to improve such as Service Now Integration, GCP Cloud Support, Better Dashboard visualization for application transactions flow. Other than these feature everything is there in AppOptics and that's a reason given 9 points out of 10.
Read full review
Customer service from Solarwinds has always been stellar. We've never gone unnoticed, even though we're currently within their tail segment. They're a great partner to us and indeed an important one. When we've had to submit a ticket, we've always received a response within 24 hours. I'd highly recommend SolarWinds to any organization with a server network
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
What we found positive in AppOptics from others is:
  • Easy to install and manage.
  • Various stack support.
  • Point to point deep-dive metrics and correlation.
  • Metrics like DB connection, query analysis, latency in API calls, and other connections, response codes for various APIs, etc are the key ones in our case, which AppOptics provides efficiently.
  • Alerts can be sent on different channels.
Read full review
We have only used Pingdom for these needs, so I can't speak directly to competitors. That being said, for the reasons we used Pingdom it was fantastic value and the fact we never bothered to look for a competitor speaks volumes about our satisfaction with the product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Application monitoring troubleshooting became more accurate. Accurate results save more man-hours of manual troubleshooting.
  • As Realtime monitoring and alerts provide more flexibility, downtime can be minimized and Accurate Root causes can be provided.
  • Dashboards can be useful for making future strategy based on trends.
  • Installation and integration is easy.
Read full review
  • Our client has continued to use our services
  • It has helped our organisation keep up to date about any site traffic fluctuations and help us make educated decisions on appropriate server resources for the site
  • The service is relatively inexpensive making it easy to cost into our maintenance charges
Read full review
ScreenShots

SolarWinds AppOptics Screenshots

Screenshot of AppOptics Home ScreenScreenshot of AppOptics DashboardScreenshot of AppOptics TracesScreenshot of AppOptics Trace Root CauseScreenshot of AppOptics InfrastructureScreenshot of Host Heat Map

SolarWinds Pingdom Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of