Splunk Enterprise Security is an analytics-driven SIEM that helps to combat threats with actionable intelligence and advanced analytics at scale.
N/A
Splunk SOAR
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Splunk now offers a security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) platform via its acquisition of Phantom. Splunk Security Orchestration and Automation (Splunk SOAR) provides playbook automation and is available as a standalone solution.
N/A
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk SOAR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk SOAR
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk SOAR
Considered Both Products
Splunk Enterprise Security
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
LogRhythm is good for a team comprising mostly non-technical IT users. Unlike Splunk, it has a GUI log search and a good ticketing system. Splunk is better than Logrhythm for me as it provides me with the ultimate flexibility to write custom queries. Scalyr is a good tool and …
I did not choose this product. Overall although I like ES, I think Sentinel in certain ways is the superior product. The Kusto Query language is a lot easier to use. For instance anything that requires manual parsing in query can be more difficult with this product. Also some …
AlienVault is much more user and beginner friendly, however Splunk ES very much so provides more capability for mass data manipulation, report and dashboard customization, and trend analytics.
These two really helps in better way and low cost and high productivity. Automatic detection ML help you to detect many ways and create cases based on risk score GRS UBA helps to protect organization from data ,via sharing through emails and USB s . Gurucu product license once …
Splunk enterprise is the only solution that we’ve been able to identify that provides risk based alerting, which allows our SOC to reduce analyst fatigue which would be a huge problem without it. Before RBA, there were thousands of alerts a day and it was impossible to review …
I consider Splunk Enterprise Security to have the strongest deployment methodology and troubleshoot features. Other products also provide good solutions such as Riverbed, Broadcom and Solarwinds but I think Splunk Enterprise Security is a great and trustable option to use for …
Even though Splunk ES is not the cheapest solution on the markt, we found it was still cheaper compared to Secureworks we had before. Also the level of flexibility and "thinking with the customer" is much better now.
Traditional hardware logging mechanisms do not provide in-depth research data on the threats and signatures, while Splunk Enterprise Security could easily achieve this feat.
FortiAnalzer is a hardware solution, but with Splunk, we could identify as well get the correct solution for the active threats and too with accurate and precise detailing.
- Schema on the fly indexing --> Gives you faster index searches. Even if you use Datamodes, it's 100x time faster as well. - Correlation with other domains easily gives you total visibility and reduces the time to investigate and understand the problem. - With lookups and trust, …
Securonix does not nearly meet the scale, extensibility, and maturity that Splunk ES offers. However, when looking at the MSP architecture options, Securonix is a much more flexible platform for multi-tenanting. So, Splunk ES for captive SOC platforms and Securonix for …
Splunk ES is by far the best solution in the market as per flexibility, features and support. Cost-wise, it is the most expensive option to go with, but that has its own advantages as the product that we get is premium and superior to other SIEM. The best thing about Spunk ES …
Splunk Enterprise Security allows for data normalization that does not compare to other SIEMs such as QRadar or Trustwave. QRadar requires custom dsm parsers before the data can be onboarded. I appreciate that Splunk Enterprise Security can ingest any source of data and …
LogRhythm is a superior SIEM from a purely security/SOC perspective in my opinion. However, Splunk shines if you have an expert behind the wheel or if the organization is quite large - as my experience with LogRhythm indicated it couldn't handle large-size organizations.
Splunk does not hide its correlation and analytics logic from users as much as other solutions in the same space. While some features are harder to access the underlying information is all accessible and tunable. This gives Splunk an edge over other solutions that lock the …
Splunk Enterprise Security is superior in the logging aspect and searching. That’s why it was easier to pick switch to Splunk Enterprise Security. Arcsight is however superior in the correlation and stability aspect. It’s very reliable and stable that we sometimes forget that …
Splunk SOAR is one of the more easier to use SOAR products because it gives you the ability to basically write a python script directly as a playbook rather than having to have logic steps built for each decision and only run one thing at a time. I have had previous SOAR …
Splunk SOAR is one of the more easier to use SOAR products because it gives you the ability to basically write a python script directly as a playbook rather than having to have logic steps built for each decision and only run one thing at a time. I have had previous SOAR …
If you use Splunk SIEM, you might wanna use Splunk soar, too. one vendor for SIEM and SOAR, and you do not need to think about integration, etc. Easy to use if we compare to other SOARs, chat and war rooms are great, and almost every action that we need is already created in …
Simple to utilize GUI, you'll have with you possess add-ons, Numerous integrations in existing arrangements and tools. It could be an extraordinary organizational tool that can be utilized for any kind of coordination, not as it were security.
Splunk Phantom integrates well with Splunk ES and has many integrations. One thing that I liked about XSOAR as compared to Phantom is that it has an "app-store" where you can download not only app integrations (similar to Phantom) but Playbooks and dashboards as well.
Splunk SOAR has multi vendor friendly design that suits our MSP model. Qradar on the other hand has deployment complexity and dependency on IBM's Qradar, which is less appealing for us since our clients run everything from Sentinel to elastic
Our company has very complex and dynamic security operations because of the large number of security tools and systems that we need to manage and coordinate. Moreover, it helps us to meet many regulatory and compliance requirements because it helps us to automate and document our security operations. We also use it to streamline our security operations and improve our response to potential threats.
Its best feature is its user interface, which is easy to navigate and understand. All you need is a little tutorial on how to use the Splunk query language and you're done.
Logs can be easily uploaded or shared across multiple platforms and display a highly insightful graphical representations of data using graphs, tables, and many other formats.
A lack of instruction It can be difficult to contact the support staff. Limited experience from current users.
It takes some effort to set up and learn new technology at first. More assistance is required from the support staff. The product's price needs to go down.
As we already have a lot of clients being catered with Splunk SOAR and because Splunk SOAR is robust and efficient, we are already using it, and we have understood the product to a certain extent, I feel we are personally more enticed to use and scale it to a lot of business.
You definitely need to learn how to use Splunk to get the most of the tool. There are many courses available for free to get up to speed on the usability of the tool but it's not that simple. It will take time to digest all the data and to understand how to query for what you are looking for.
Building playbooks through the visual editor is fine for basic tasks, but once you start chaining complex logic or integrating 3rd party APIs you hit a wall that requires deep scripting knowledge.
ES requires a very performant infrastructure: if it has it's performant, otherwise not. I had situation with a very performant infrastructure and I didn't notized that it was a distributed architecture, it seemed that there ware few data on my PC, othewise I experienced less performant infrastructures with less performaces.
It has APIs that are useful for integration with third party solutions as well as for absorbing large volumes of data from our servers, networks and apps. Splunk SOAR offers a variety of playbooks that we use in automating workflows for migrating data and for analyzing the data to ensure its security.
It's good when it's responsive, but I've had times where I had to wait quite a while for a response. But these are typically the exceptions rather than the rule. When you do get a response it is always well-informed and appropriate. I would say they've been trending better over time with this.
I experienced only on-line training, but the trainers were very professional and competent. Maybe it could be more useful if they also have an experience in projects because sometimes they didn't have a real project experience to communicate to the students. Anyway, it was very interesting and I learned many thing that's very difficoult (or maybe impossible!) to have by myself, aven if I have more than 10 years of Splunk activity experience.
It was very interesting and I learned many thing that's very difficoult (or maybe impossible!) to have by myself. The only problem was that, when I worked with the Splunk Professional Services, I found some difference between the training contents and the information from PS. In addition is required a long experience on Splunk Enterprise for the data ingestion part, in other words I'm able to work with ES because I'm worling on Splunk since 11 years, otherwise I'd some problem.
LogRhythm is good for a team comprising mostly non-technical IT users. Unlike Splunk, it has a GUI log search and a good ticketing system. Splunk is better than Logrhythm for me as it provides me with the ultimate flexibility to write custom queries. Scalyr is a good tool and quite frankly lot faster than Splunk. However, I prefer Splunk because of its better Dashboards and panel customization abilities. Elastic is another amazing tool. It is hard to choose between the two especially because both have different sets of logs on them. I use both. Elastic for internal server logs, Splunk for everything else.
If you use Splunk SIEM, you might wanna use Splunk soar, too. one vendor for SIEM and SOAR, and you do not need to think about integration, etc. Easy to use if we compare to other SOARs, chat and war rooms are great, and almost every action that we need is already created in Splunk SOAR.
We have on prem splunk and it’s mostly east to setup, but we have issues keeping data separated between customer splunk deployments while at the same time only having to look at one SIEM to address events in every environment
We have a 100% success rate on all our ES implementations due to the amazing documentation and Splunk enablement on the subject.
Our Splunk ES business has grown 100% YoY for the last 3 years.
In terms of long term management and maintenance, ES has been highly stable and predictable, reducing our overhead on costly services team for ad hoc maintenance work.
The playbooks are valuable. They are the core component. Being able to implement and build a code process to work through and scale out what we want to do is valuable
Before its use, analyzing each email would take at least 15 to 20 minutes, with some complex cases taking up to 30 minutes...With the automation provided by Splunk Phantom, we could significantly reduce the amount of time and human effort required to complete this task