TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Submittable

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ASubmittable offers tools to launch, measure, and grow social impact programs, locally and globally. From grants and scholarships to awards and CSR programs, Submittable partners with users to make a difference. The vendor states Submittable has supported over 95,000 social impact programs, receiving nearly 20 million applications, and that teams save an average of 12 hours per week and launch in an average of 14 days.

    $10,000

    per year

    Pricing
    Submittable
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Submittable
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Yes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Submittable
    Considered Both Products
    Submittable
    Chose Submittable
    Submittable had all of the functionality we were looking for at a very competitive price.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    When we decided on Submittable: a) Most cost-effective: solution would cost under USD3,000 per year with no setup fee. b) We needed key features of this solution that were available out-of-the-box, e.g., Online Application Form -- including answers to approximately 20-30 …
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Price, ease of use and simplicity of process building. In the other products we explored that cost was significantly higher and we found that for what we are looking for, Submittable provided a much better value and was way easier to use for both the staff running the grant …
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    We have been using submittable since 2016. The product has grown, and we have recommended it to many groups. Cost-wise, the price has become unattainable for some. I have compared prices with other systems whose names I don’t remember, and the pricing seems on par. The platform …
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Submittable is much simpler to use for submitting to my journal and writers prefer it over Duotrope.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Submittable isn't in the same league as these other platforms. It's trying to get there but it's been a rocky road. Neither customer support nor the account people we've dealt with at Submittable seem particularly knowledgeable about how the product actually works for …
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Our company chose Submittable before I was hired and it is now a legacy system
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    I used Call for Entry before and think it works very well, in a comparable way, and is much, much less expensive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Submittable offers a better UX/UI and a more manageable pricing model
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    I selected Submittable because I had used it in the past as an applicant for a different program, and I found it easy to use from that perspective. I met with other companies and did a comparative analysis and Submittable was the most user friendly and also the most affordable …
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    The university also uses Qualtrics, but I found it clunky and hard to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Many features on the LGL forms do not translate to Submittable and vice versa. We use Submittable more because it allows for better branching and flexibility to customize each form rather than needing multiple for the same data collection or selection process. While we like LGL …
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Submittable's customer service was more helpful than other platforms we considered using.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    As a user seeking a seamless form creation experience, I can confidently say that Submittable exceeds all expectations with its diverse range of options and efficient backend processes. From the moment I started using it, I was impressed by the abundance of features and the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    When it comes to collecting applications, no one beats Submittable in terms of features and functionality. With other software we used, there were far too many limitations, including having to manually download data, inability to use logic for fields, and no analytics. The …
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Honestly, I haven't used other comparable products to Submittable. That said, the interface is far better than the submission managers for so many other literary magazines. It feels far cleaner and far more professional.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    I haven't used any other competing products.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    There was no good way for us to keep blog publiscations within our microsot suit so we moved onto Submittable.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Submittable has so many functionalities which helps me when I need to ask applicants very specific questions or branch applicants off into differing categories. It is simple yet thorough.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    There is no contest. Google Forms is easy and free, but has severely limited customization options, and 0 review process. I love how I have everything in one platform with Submittable.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    The Google suite of services is essentially free, but it is not designed specifically for applicants, reviewers and awardees. However, it is very intuitive and user friendly. We have been able to make both services work for us and meet our particular needs. Google saves money, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    I can't think of other services I've reviewed in-depth like Submittable. We like Submittable. We're consistently happy with the results and have felt no need to explore alternative options especially with so many of our users being already familiar with the interface. We've …
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Submittable is definitely more agile to adapt to your needs, and it has more parameters to choose from. On the other side, our current size of the grants is limited, so I don't know if Submittable can efficiently scale up.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    Blackbaud Grantmaking was more complicated/difficult to use but had more features that enabled project & relationship management. It was also more integrated with our financial management system.
    Incentivized
    Chose Submittable
    I've also just used a system called Slideroom for a jury process through another grants organization.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Submittable
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (83 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    7.9
    (79 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.1
    (2 ratings)
    Online Training
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Configurability
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    8.3
    (4 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.4
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.0
    (3 ratings)