OneStream vs. Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
OneStream is an enterprise finance platform that unifies financial and operational data, embeds AI for better decisions and productivity, and can extend to meet the evolving needs of businesses without adding technical debt. Presented as an operating system for modern Finance, it unifies core financial functions and empowering the CFO to become a critical driver of business strategy, innovation, and growth. It is a cloud-based platform that modernizes the Office of the CFO. The…
$0
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Tagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
Pricing
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Basic
$12
per month billed annually
Basic
$15
per month
Standard
$32
per month billed annually
Professional
$39
per month billed annually
Standard
$39
per month
Professional
$49
per month
Enterprise
$83
per month billed annually
Enterprise
$99
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThe solution is only for Enterprises. Pricing for software is based on number of total users and one user gets all software functionality. Implementation would be based on what business problem or problems the solution will be used to solve, such as financial consolidation and reporting or planning or account reconciliations, etc.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Considered Both Products
OneStream
Chose OneStream
Specifically talking with OneStream is very useful and considering easy to access more standardized and help to easy to navigate. Most common is user friendly and best financial planning tool which I ever seen! Compare with other tools OneStream provide best excel integration …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is a superior product compared to our previous legacy system. Would highly recommend for finance teams.
Chose OneStream
OneStream appears to be the best-in-class solution. Still, SAP Analytics Cloud integrates so seamlessly with SAP that it's tough to justify going "out of the family" when you're already deeply integrated with SAP.
Chose OneStream
For me, the choice for OneStream is due to the amount that can be configured and pre-configured which allows us to create standard and reusable content. This speeds up our service delivery.
Chose OneStream
OneStream is much more robust, has functionality around creating financial statements in Common Currency which other systems we used could not handle. OneStream has a really good structure around it. We believe it's a much better fit for a Global company of our size. We're just …
Chose OneStream
Compared to some of the options we researched, OneStream is a much more modern product in the way it combines the different capabilities of intense calculations, highly customizable dashboards, great narrative reporting as well as the much loved Excel plug-in capability. We …
Chose OneStream
The performance gains with OneStream alone are a reason to switch from Oracle, but the versatility of the application is the icing on the cake. Versatility is added by the additional dimensions, the customizable dashboards where you can plan for Revenue and Expenses, People …
Chose OneStream
OneStream gave me my life back. Working in outdated Essbase for closing the books & Forecasting it would take us 10-12 days working 12 - 16 hour days. 2020 we went to OneStream. I have not worked a weekend since, closing and forecasting went to 5-7 days working 8-9 hours a …
Chose OneStream
IBM Analytics seemed quite competitive. OneStream was selected because it has the consolidation and planning functionalities in the same cube. Overall cost for implementation and use were lower.
Lucanet and Anaplan seemed to have less flexibility to adapt the planning …
Chose OneStream
OneStream had a lot more capabilities as an all rounder tool that could leverage Actuals, forecast planning plus the other features like Tax and Transaction matching. OneStream also offer a Marketplace where a lot of bolt on modules are available for free with only some …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is the only one that seamlessly integrates close/consolidation with budget and planning in one tool. It integrates easily with ERPs and supports full financial statement AND management reporting
Chose OneStream
OneStream offers a comprehensive toolset to facilitate most modeling requirements. Our primary focus for selecting onestream was to facilitate a fast, robust and fully auditable consolidation tool that would meet our growing business requirements. OneStream has delivered on all …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is able to integrate faster and has a broader scope of newer technologies which makes it interact with other systems much more efficiently and seamlessly.
Chose OneStream
OneStream combines functionality that is normally spread over multiple solutions with other vendors, and provides an integration that previously could only be achieved via complicated technical structures to integrate and combine solutions for actual reporting and planning on …
Chose OneStream
OneStream single unified platform capabilities are outstanding. The flexibility around OneStream has allowed us to mold OneStream into our business model, whereas, I felt SAP forced us into their model. As an analyst, the reporting capabilities are my bread and butter and they …
Chose OneStream
Better GUI, faster, easier to maintain/administer.
Chose OneStream
I think HFM is very good at consolidation as well, but it is less flexible, not a platform, not as modern (look-and-feel), not as fast. In my opinion, OneStream stands out in the platform thinking. You have one licence which you can use for consolidation, tax, FP&A and even ESG …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is still being further developed and improved. Their marketplace provides some nice pre-built solutions. These are not as common with competitors. OneStream has a helpdesk that customers can reach out to instead of going through a middle man like consultants or …
Chose OneStream
OneStream is quite updated comparing with BPC. It has instant updates and it has more features like quick view, cubeview, dashboards, BI, Task scheduler. It's good for businesses to use it with a wide range of options to make their business decisions in short times. OneStream …
Chose OneStream
Achieve business expectations compared to other competitors
customized WFs based on requirements
BRs to meet end result
Chose OneStream
OneStream is the overall clear winner against HFM. There are a few things HFM does better (a couple things in Smart View), but it just doesn't have as much capability. The single, integrated platform that OneStream is provides a massive upgrade from HFM.
Chose OneStream
Hyperion HFM was a previous market leader in the EPM space but the OneStream FX platofrm far surpasses its offerings from Dashboarding, Workflow, Planning and forecasting all in one platform which under Hyperion was bundled in separate modules.
Chose OneStream
better system design and integration of tools
Chose OneStream
To sum it up, OneStream is like the Oracle Hyperion suite having a baby and feeding it steroids. It is leagues ahead.

OneStream is a one stop shop with one licence needed. There is no need to buy a licence for each product used like Hyperion.
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
After yeras of SAP adoption we decided to give a chance to Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik as it was a new company on the market and offers us full support to archivi our targets
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Compared to the competitors, Tagetik offered a platform mainly better in user overall experience, since this was one of the most important needs of the business. Also, reporting and data entry functionalities seemed to work better compared to the competitors, also considering …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Oracle Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Management, IBM Cognos Controller, IBM Planning Analytics and SAP Analytics Cloud
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We use Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetikfor budgeting, reporting, and consolidation already for a couple of years. And to speed up our (monthly / quarterly) close, we recently implemented the transaction matching and account reconciliation modules from Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik. …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Oracle Essbase is another EPM software that we used but compared to Tagetik, it's not user friendly and the creation of dimensions and describing rules are more technically difficult. Drill down and analysis are not as easy as double clicking on Cch tagetik for immediate …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Similar, but with key strengths (report formats and online help and support) and some shortfalls (e.g. HFM ad-hoc reporting and smart view tools are better than those in Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik). On balance, taking into account licensing and the full cost of ownership, …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
SAP S/4 HANA is a standalone tool for databases. I don't know any other product which is that effective with the databases. but for many customers it's too expensive and powerful which also results in the knowhow is needed and otherwise its really hard to get into SAP S/4 HANA …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Better workflow capabilities Strongest solution for consolidation Easy to maintain and finance owned
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Tagetik have a better integration in all parts in our customers systems. it is a lot easier to implement the data. SAP has the problem that there is a lot of different programms and tools, which has to buy to work with a complete tool. But if one part is missing the total sap …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Jedox is a white paper - you can do anything and when you say this it is less accurate to the financial need, it asks a lot of specifics.
CCH Tagetik has a financial DNA that helps a lot.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We have been using CCH Tagetik for uploading Financial data from our other ERP system such as ACCPAC, Navision, Talent etc.. My experience with SAP was using them as ERP system. Thus can't really do a lot of comparison between the two system. The main reason why CCH Tagetik was …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We have had a 3-year experience with Anaplan for budgeting and performance management on part of our business. Anaplan is brilliant provided you have technical skills to manage multi-dimensional data, and
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik is way more user friendly and the online help is understandable by non-IT people.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
I was not involved in the selection process.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
1. Price - CCH Tagetik offers a price advantage as compared to bigger competitors.
2. Modules - CCH Tagetik is able to provide what the Finance of today needs.
3. Usability - It is not difficult to use once a user is able to grasps hold of the Tagetik concept and mechanism
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
We wanted a more accounting-based solution to meet IFRS 17. There are some solutions which were fundamentally more data-based or actuarial-based, hence we wanted a solution that was fundamentally strong in accounting/ financial applications.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik was in the end the best choice for us. As I was not directly involved in the decision making process, I don't have all the details, but a combination of costanalysis, ease-of-use, migration-analysis and the fact that CCH Tagetik has a dutch office almost in walking …
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik has excellent multi-currency support and it enables us to plan at a low-level of detail, which is very important to us.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
A lot of integration with the other enterprise database (SQL).
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
The price of the product was a huge improvement from our previous tool
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
This product is very comparable to BPC but much more affordable and the customer service is far superior.
Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik is more complete software and more user-friendly. The user experience is very comfortable.
Features
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.2
Ratings
7% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.1
Ratings
6% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates8.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
6.4
Ratings
24% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.8
Ratings
18% below category average
Drill-down analysis5.60 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Formatting capabilities6.60 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
Publish to Web8.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Versioning7.70 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.70 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
6.9
Ratings
10% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.6
Ratings
1% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.1
Ratings
4% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.20 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.50 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.60 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)7.80 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
6.1
Ratings
24% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.1
Ratings
24% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access6.60 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile5.60 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
7.7
Ratings
7% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
Ratings
2% above category average
Long-term financial planning7.70 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Financial budgeting7.50 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Forecasting7.50 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Scenario modeling6.90 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Management reporting9.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.8
Ratings
10% above category average
Financial data consolidation9.20 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Journal entries and reports7.60 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.40 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.70 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Minority Ownership7.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting9.00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.80 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management Reporting8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting6.30 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting7.80 Ratings8.70 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Personalized dashboards9.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards8.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
KPIs8.40 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.30 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data7.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.4
Ratings
12% above category average
Flat file integration9.50 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Excel data integration8.70 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.80 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.3
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.5
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.4
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
OneStream is best suited for medium to large companies that find themselves doing a wide variety of manual processes during their financial close cycle will get the most benefit. That does mean a lot of change so there has to be very intentional communication around change management in order to get the buy in that is necessary for success.
Read full review
Well suited for large multi-entity international, multi-currency, multi GAAP groups with excellent report writing features, customizations, and validation traps with minimal IT support. The ability to customize dimensions and dimension structures is a key strength. The intuitive user interface enables easy adoption by new users and training times are short. Upload features via embedded customisable ETL and standardised Excel templates are very efficient. Error checking is intuitive and helpful. Less appropriate for small single entity businesses.
Read full review
Pros
  • Consolidation engine is powerful, we have around 500 entities translating from multiple source currencies into a common currency at good speed.
  • We leverage the Flash and Quarterly forecast providing users with pre seeded data so they only need to make tweaks rather then filling in a lot of manual forms.
  • We use Transaction matching for processing a lot of intercompany matching invoices from the ERP systems which helps end users a lot. Data is fed in from source ERPS and TXM generates the auto matches based on criteria provided.
  • We have a custom Tax module which we use to pull in tax entries from the consolidation side and this gives the Tax teams starting position for their tax calculations and enables them to also do a quarterly forecast estimate.
  • OneStream has great dashboarding capabilities for a whole range of use cases from charts and graphs, to drill-back data to running even steps that users can execute without having access to the source code/rules in the background!
Read full review
  • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
  • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
  • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
  • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
  • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
Read full review
Cons
  • Provide some more prebuilt dashboards that serve as reference examples for specific topics, to allow users to gain an idea of all that is possible
  • Provide some clear cut explanations to explain some of the standard concepts, to allow companies that start their implementation to gain a quick understanding of how things work
Read full review
  • The steps of setting up the loading of data is slightly painful.
  • The steps and error message while connecting the process workflow has to provide a hint on which area needed to be fixed (because it could be anywhere or anything).
  • The combination of 2 segments for the excel upload on what's needed to eliminate is yet to resolved. Which made the entire list very long.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Currently we are using OneStream with people 80 - 100 to load the PL, BS , Forecast budget and People Planning. OneStream give us more visibility on trend and way forward thinking. Thanks to OneStream for the tool which helps the business in growing way. Thinking of innovation OneStream is right path.
Read full review
Based on our business requirements, its current implementation and way of use (in terms of the efficiceny) it's more than certain that we will renew our contract with CCH Tagetik. CCH Tagetik increased our efficiency regarding reporting and provides more features which made it easier to take decisions. Besides of that, it provided he best solutions for reporting according to the Solvency II standards. Since this is still the case, it is also a reason to stay with CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
Usability
Overall usability as an end-user is very easy. There are more people in the system getting information now than the prior platform used. People are gathering their information quicker as well. From an administrator standpoint, there are fewer glitches and issues than the prior platform. This is very good.
Read full review
On a general level, it is a flexible, streamlined system, that can integrate operational data with accounting data for a better financial overview and budget planning. Reporting wise, the types and the amount of data analysis available or that can be created are close to endless. Having a quicker, more flexible way of analysing data certainly means better, faster reporting and better use of the data itself.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
Read full review
Support Rating
OneStream support is focused on the infrastructure. Which means mainly when there issues with accessing to the system, they will be able to help. When the question is to much leaning towards functional it really becomes billable. The other issue is that the response time is not optimal. There is a lot of pingpong of messages and the time between the message can sometimes be long. Sometimes this result into a simple ticket to be taking days before it is closed.
Read full review
I have had the pleasure of attending some courses at the dutch offices of CCH Tagetik. These were very educational with excellent trainers, a very enjoyable accomodation and they helped me a lot with regards to starting to use CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
the training was not bad, but we got more training from working with the consultants. This because it is based on our system
Read full review
Online Training
onestream offers a range of training. I have attended a number of trainings. During the trainings a vast amount of information is discussed. The trainings also include exercises. The speed of the training is pretty high. When reviewing the training material afterwards, I found that the material is not complete as reference as it relies also very much on the verbal explanation and elaboration.
Read full review
Online training is the only form of training we could deploy during the pandemic. This service has been nonethless delivered with the same standards and the same results of the traditional training procedures.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OneStream is much more robust, has functionality around creating financial statements in Common Currency which other systems we used could not handle. OneStream has a really good structure around it. We believe it's a much better fit for a Global company of our size. We're just scratching a surface of what the system capabilities are.
Read full review
Oracle Essbase is another EPM software that we used but compared to Tagetik, it's not user friendly and the creation of dimensions and describing rules are more technically difficult. Drill down and analysis are not as easy as double clicking on Cch tagetik for immediate information. But as I have not used this software much and tagetik more, this is all I can say
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Customers have moved from multiple EPM systems as well as multiple EPM applications to OneStream.
  • Their ROI has been quite high as lesser admins are required, no need to move data back & forth, no need for an additional dashboarding / BI tool, once a user is on OneStream can leverage it for more than 50+ use cases at no additional license cost.
  • Automation, direct integration, scheduling, complex calculation capabilities, all help to further improve ROI and free up the time for the team to do value-adding tasks.
  • Last but not the least is the confidence on the numbers is much higher.
Read full review
  • It has definitely helped to standardize reporting across the company. Teams are able to pull the same reports and everything has the same feel to it.
  • Since there are so many standard reports that we are able to create, it makes the analysts jobs easier since they are not spending so much time re-creating reports.
  • With any system, there is going to be some admin work required. Creating new reports, accounts and entities does take time, but it is fairly simple and doesn't take a ton of time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

OneStream Screenshots

Screenshot of OneStream DashboardScreenshot of Profitability AnalysisScreenshot of Product and Customer ProfitabilityScreenshot of Account ReconciliationsScreenshot of Cash PlanningScreenshot of Financial Signaling

Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

Screenshot of Homepage